Originally posted by Omega VisionI was never trying.
You really aren't trying anymore.2009 Mindset was funny.
2011 Mindset is just flabby and boring. Your sense of humor quit. Your bird quit.
Why do you guys act like you paid for a stand up routine?
Or better yet, why do you expect me to care if you think I'm funny? g007-psyduck
Originally posted by Omega Vision
So wait...ultra high end showings are a-okay and require no explanation whatsoever but you can dismiss low showings because you don't like them?Will you train me in your ways? awesome
Answer me this: does Grey Hulk have a single other feat that's even near that level?
Him on panel being stated as being capable of punching as hard as Savage Hulk.
Originally posted by Colossus-Big C😂
LOl at hulk not having any feats coming close to planatarygrey hulk busted an astroid bigger than earth
hulk held the tectonic plates of a planet together to prevent it from exploding.
Beyonder for christ sakes said hulk had no upperlimit, his physical potential was infinit, literally
Originally posted by Galan007
Good lord.ALL of Hulk's showings are canon to the character he is now, regardless of what level you believe Pak intends him to be operating at. Therefore, ALL of his feats are most certainly applicable. After all, it's not like Hulk said: "I've been holding back my entire career" -- he merely listed very specific instances (ie. "the war in New York", and "yesterday"😉 in which he was holding back.
Either way, that is an entirely moot point. Even current Hulk, at current levels, has yet to come remotely close to destroying a planet under his own power. Until he DOES, it's completely illogical to assume he CAN. Statements =/= feats, and feats are what we go by here.
Good lord indeed. You are being willfully ignorant. You cant hope to counter any of the points i made regarding your terrible grasp of logic and so you would rather repeat the same thing ad nauseam
Hulks feat when operating at a weaker strength level, being canon to him does not mean that those feats can be used as a basis for determining the power cap of a considerably more powerful hulk. The former are not binding on the latter at all. The same way regular supermans feats are not binding in the determination of sundipped supermans strength cap. I mean you would literally have to be retarded to think otherwise. Why even supposedly good posters are willing to throw logic out the window just to denigrate the hulk is baffling.
Red herring, the point isnt whether Hulk could have done the planet destroying feat on his own. Christ ive mentioned this repeatedly. Its about whether we accept that he did it in conjunction with She rulk and leave it at that or we superimpose unsupported nonsense onto the panel. Faulty rationalizations=/= feats and the latter is indeed what we go by here.
Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
is it really that hard to comprehend that hulk has no limit to his physical strength? sure call it that its just a statement, but if hulk was some day written to prove that statement it would now be PIS 😐
The "x character has no limit" statement has just been used for a lot of characters. It wouldn't be fair to only apply it to Hulk, is all.
Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
is it really that hard to comprehend that hulk has no limit to his physical strength? sure call it that its just a statement, but if hulk was some day written to prove that statement it would now be PIS 😐
Originally posted by -Pr-
The "x character has no limit" statement has just been used for a lot of characters. It wouldn't be fair to only apply it to Hulk, is all.
For serious.
People (sometimes) take statements too literally. Hulk potentially has no limit. Awesome. What's that supposed to mean? Is he supposed to get infinitely angry to gain infinite strength?
In FC, Superman demonstrated that he has no limit, after lifting half of infinity (which, for those of you counting at home, is infinity).
Please kids, take statements - and even some feats - with a grain (or handful) of salt.
Originally posted by Cogitohe doesnt have to get "infinitly angy" depending on the writer he just need to be angry and his strength should gradually increase
For serious.People (sometimes) take statements too literally. Hulk potentially has no limit. Awesome. What's that supposed to mean? Is he supposed to get infinitely angry to gain infinite strength?
In FC, Superman demonstrated that he has no limit, after lifting half of infinity (which, for those of you counting at home, is infinity).
Please kids, take statements - and even some feats - with a grain (or handful) of salt.
also even though a persons strength potential is limitless its still impossible to lift an infinit amount of weightt, you cannot count to infinity tons...
Originally posted by Naija boySmh. This is getting old. Your debating 'tactic' comes off as little more than repeated [and sad] attempts at badgering... Something I refused to partake in.
Good lord indeed. You are being willfully ignorant. You cant hope to counter any of the points i made regarding your terrible grasp of logic and so you would rather repeat the same thing ad nauseamHulks feat when operating a a weaker strength level, being canon to him does not mean that those feats can be used as a basis for determining the power cap of a considerably more powerful hulk. The former are not binding on the latter at all. The same way regular supermans feats are not binding in the determination of sundipped supermans strength cap. I mean you would literally have to be retarded to think otherwise. Why even supposedly good posters are willing to throw logic out the window just to denigrate the hulk is baffling.
Red herring, the point isnt whether Hulk could have done the planet destroying feat on his own. Christ ive mentioned this repeatedly. Its about whether we accept that he did it in conjunction with She rulk and leave it at that or we superimpose unsupported nonsense onto the panel. Faulty rationalizations=/= feats and the latter is indeed what we go by here.
As I've said, and will continue saying: even if you combine the best on panel feats from Hulk and Betty thus far, it wouldn't come remotely close to equaling the feat their collision generated in IH. That said, it is certainly quite logical to assume that the energy they released collectively was well beyond what either of them have SHOWN separately thus far. You not agreeing with my assessment doesn't really mean a thing, tbh.
And I will also say (again) that I am NOT excluding Hulk potentially destroying a planet by himself as a possibility -- I'm just going by what we've been shown up to now (8-16-2011)