Originally posted by SimbonDrax didn't look as impressive when he went up against other characters though whereas Hulk has looked very impressive against similar foes without the new badass Hulk type thing he currently has going for him.
Classic Drax ripped apart a star; and when he blew up a planet and its moon through collatoral damage, he was only KO'd, not destroyed as Hulk was. Even the less powerful Dumb Drax was implied to have the power to destroy an entire dimension.
How did Hulk appear more impressive? Because he was burlier? Because he had green energy coming out of his eyes?
Nothing he has done even approaches ripping apart a star; Surfer and Morg have blown up a solar system by tussling -- and without dying, I might add. Vaporizing the people he did would be more impressive if they had any feats to mention, other than being dubiously amped. I say dubiously, because any amp that isn't backed up by feats isn't actually an amp, just as any "weakened state" that doesn't have correspondingly low feats isn't really a weakened state. For instance, Mangog's most recent appearance was supposed to have him at higher levels than ever, even though he was demonstrably not at higher levels, while Magneto's best feats are almost all when he was in a "weakened" state. Power multipliers are meaningless: warrior madness Thor is not ten times as powerful as normal Thor; the unipower doesn't always make its bearer 50 times as powerful; there is no reason to believe that the giant versions of Bi-Beast and Wendigo were even equal to their normal-size counterparts.
Originally posted by Simbon
How did Hulk appear more impressive? Because he was burlier? Because he had green energy coming out of his eyes?Nothing he has done even approaches ripping apart a star; Surfer and Morg have blown up a solar system by tussling -- and without dying, I might add. Vaporizing the people he did would be more impressive if they had any feats to mention, other than being dubiously amped. I say dubiously, because any amp that isn't backed up by feats isn't actually an amp, just as any "weakened state" that doesn't have correspondingly low feats isn't really a weakened state. For instance, Mangog's most recent appearance was supposed to have him at higher levels than ever, even though he was demonstrably not at higher levels, while Magneto's best feats are almost all when he was in a "weakened" state. Power multipliers are meaningless: warrior madness Thor is not ten times as powerful as normal Thor; the unipower doesn't always make its bearer 50 times as powerful; there is no reason to believe that the giant versions of Bi-Beast and Wendigo were even equal to their normal-size counterparts.
When did Surfer destroy a Solar System?
Originally posted by carver9
You got it wrong buddy...PG Drax>Classic Drax.Drax need a partner. Edit the stips.
PG Drax never had feats as good as Classic Drax. As usual, you simply ignore feats and go by carver-verse hierarchy.
Hulk needed a partner of equal power for his best feat, and that feat is still inferior to Drax's star feat. If anyone needs a partner here, it's Hulk.
Originally posted by Simbon
PG Drax never had feats as good as Classic Drax. As usual, you simply ignore feats and go by carver-verse hierarchy.Hulk needed a partner of equal power for his best feat, and that feat is still inferior to Drax's star feat. If anyone needs a partner here, it's Hulk.
Where in that comic did it say Hulk NEEDED help to pull what he pulled?
Classic Drax is pg Drax "with an amp". They are the same peeps.