Current Hulk & Gladiator VS Odin (In a Fist Fight)

Started by -Pr-9 pages

Originally posted by psycho gundam
pr really shouldn't have said that.

one could interpret that as him endorsing that nonsense only because it's a counter stance against something he agrees should be countered (lack of success/logic notwithstanding), and he's letting h1 do the trench fighting for him.

one could interpret that, yes mmm

😐

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
PR is the Palpatine to h1's Vader?

****.

More like-

Actually, I'm gonna stop there.

--

Guys, keep it on topic please.

Originally posted by h1a8
Who cares how Thing lost. I could break your face in and you beat me like a girl. It wouldn't change the fact that I was strong enough to break your face in.

If WWH hit another WWH in the face then do you think his face would be the same, slightly worst, or very worst than what Thing did?

What's your point?

Originally posted by h1a8
This is crazy, Odin has no feats that put him over Glads in physical strength. I say Glads beats Odin solo in h2h due to speed and better strength (by feats).

Glads can survive in the heart of a star. Core of star> What Hulk did
Hulk isn't going to tickle him.

I'm sorry, but your a f*cking retard. There's really no other description that fits at this point.

Not even going to indulge you anymore by discussing anything. You want to press the matter, I'll battle zone you, that's about it.

Rage, there's no need for that kind of insulting language.

H1, there's absolutely no basis for what you stated if you look at comics with anything approaching common sense. Odin, and most beings of his like, simply don't require strength feats to compete with the likes of Thor, Gladiator, Superman et al. It's, in a word, below them, even considering that this is a fist-fight. I'd advise you to stop lowballing, or you're going to end up getting warned.

And before you bring up Odin's "class", it's an arbitrary figure designed to appease fanboys, and has absolutely no bearing on a fight like this.

Keep arguing you're point H1, never surrender!!!

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
PR is the Palpatine to h1's Vader?

****.

the real question is who was carver's yoda

Current Hulk and Glads lose if Odin amps fast enough. Which might prove difficult given Glads speed.. I'm not sure... it would help to see a rematch between Zeus and Hulk now... leaning towards Team imho

Originally posted by h1a8
Who cares how Thing lost. I could break your face in and you beat me like a girl. It wouldn't change the fact that I was strong enough to break your face in.

If WWH hit another WWH in the face then do you think his face would be the same, slightly worst, or very worst than what Thing did?

much much worse and hulk's damage soak mostly comes from his dynamic healing factor, not his hard durabilty

Originally posted by -Pr-

What's your point?

I actually forgot what's the relevance of what I'm arguing in respect to the thread itself.
I had to backtrack to find out. It's basically about a character being slammed or choked doesn't mean they are weaker in strength (what Odin did to Thor). Here goes:

Wodenson said,

Yeah, it does. If Odin is strong enough to physically humiliate Thor, he's strong enough to run roughshod over Gladiator. Hold the Gladiator romanticism and just stick with what's been proven.

I said,

I see now. This is where we must agree to disagree.
You use reasoning of how characters fair when they engage each other as to who is stronger. Where I use DIRECT evidence of who is stronger (who overpowers who when they are grappled up or who has the better strength feats). The reason I don't use your type of reasoning is because I know that weaker beings can beat or embarrass stronger beings (as shown many times in comics).

Durability, skill, and speed are also other factors. For example, Colossus can hang with beings like Savage Hulk because of his durability and skill. But he is far weaker in strength. Thing has hit nearly as hard as WWH (in evidence of his single blow that bloodied and broke WWH's face in) but his durability can't withstand hits from WWH as much.

Note:
In all the Thor/Odin occurrences Odin took the initiative. Thor never resisted his attack. It was more like a surprised attack.

Carver said,

WTF. So thing can bust Sentry face up? So thing can hit harder than Thor (it was stated on panel that green Scar can hit harder than Thor)? So thing can punch 2 beings including a chunk of a city out of orbit?

I said,

Stop lowballing. Thing busted WWH's face up good with one punch. Can you say "Super Bloody"?

Darkone said,

Dude how old are you really? Your logic is garbage bottom line. She Hulk and The Thing gave WWH a bloody nose and they got thrashed, and you are sitting there and telling us that was impressive. whats impressive that Hulk didn't kill them in which he could have easily. Read some damn comics, before making any comments think before you speak, every time you speak it's garbage logic that doesn't make sense.

I said,

Of course its impressive. WWH would have given another WWH the SAME bloody face as Thing did with a punch. The fact that Thing's and She Hulk's durability wasn't on WWH's level is the reason they couldn't stand against his blows.

Durability =/= Strength.

Note: I wasn't saying nor implying that Thing is strong as WWH, just the fact that his blow resembled a blow that WWH would give to himself (another WWH fighting him). This may be PIS what Thing did but my point is that this occurrence alone would say that WWH is not more than 2x as strong as Thing and Thing's durability is less than WWH's. But other occurrences say that WWH is more than 2x as strong as Thing and what Thing did is maybe PIS.

Darkone said,

Durability and strength they couldn't stand a snow ball chance in Hell. It was not impressive, what would have been impressive they KO out of the city they didn't, the Thing got smack down like prostitute on a sidewalk and she-hulk nearly wet herself when Hulk punk'ed her.

And finally I said,

Who cares how Thing lost. I could break your face in and you beat me like a girl. It wouldn't change the fact that I was strong enough to break your face in.

If WWH hit another WWH in the face then do you think his face would be the same, slightly worst, or very worst than what Thing did?

Note:
This was to show that if I'm strong enough to generate great force (resembling yours) then you beating me down doesn't disprove that my hitting power is in the vicinity as yours.

But all of this is moot anyway when I agreed with Wodenson that Odin is stronger than Glads provided that we see that Odin is as strong as the Serpent. I just disagree with choking someone or slamming someone, by surprise attack and someone who weighs far less than your strength, into the ground proves you are stronger.

Originally posted by 753
much much worse and hulk's damage soak mostly comes from his dynamic healing factor, not his hard durabilty

IMO, The feat was PIS. I realize that now. But no one can tell me that Thing didn't apply a WWH like blow, because I've seen it with my own eyes.

Originally posted by h1a8
IMO, The feat was PIS. I realize that now. But no one can tell me that Thing didn't apply a WWH like blow, because I've seen it with my own eyes.

Hurting Hulk doesn't make him as strong as Hulk. Or do you mean something else?

Originally posted by -Pr-
Hurting Hulk doesn't make him as strong as Hulk. Or do you mean something else?
You didn't read my reply to yours above this. I claimed that is was PIS and Thing had no business hitting WWH in the manner as it would appear that WWH can hit himself with.

Thing is nowhere near as strong as WWH. My point was that if we didn't know anything but that scene we would say that WWH is not more than 2x as strong. But since we have other evidences then we can say that WWH is more than 2x as strong.

@ this part in particular

Originally posted by h1a8
My point was that if we didn't know anything but that scene we would say that WWH is not more than 2x as strong.

Why? How does the scene convey that?

Originally posted by -Pr-
@ this part in particular

Why? How does the scene convey that?

Assuming we never seen WWH or Thing before (these are two new characters) then Thing's blow on WWH makes it seem that his strength is in the vicinity of WWH's. Would you agree? Generally in comics when someone is greatly outclassed in strength then their blows on the much stronger usually doesn't have any effect.

Thor never resisted Odin and Odin always physically attacked Thor by surprise.

Originally posted by h1a8
Assuming we never seen WWH or Thing before (these are two new characters) then Thing's blow on WWH makes it seem that his strength is in the vicinity of WWH's. Would you agree? Generally in comics when someone is greatly outclassed in strength then their blows on the much stronger usually doesn't have any effect.

Thor never resisted Odin and Odin always physically attacked Thor by surprise.

Honestly? No. I always tend to seperate strength and durability. Maybe that's just me.

Originally posted by h1a8
Generally in comics when someone is greatly outclassed in strength then their blows on the much stronger usually doesn't have any effect.

You dirty mutherf*#%$!

Did you really just say that? After all the mind numbing nonsense you've spouted, did you honestly just try and use a showing of durability as a means to determine a gap in strength?

I fear for the safety of those around you.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Honestly? No. I always tend to seperate strength and durability. Maybe that's just me.

I do too. I agree 100%. This is point I said in the earlier reply. I was appealing to other member's logic though as well.

Beating on someone and doing damage has to do with the entire combination of skill, durability, strength, and surprise (one not braced for impact) and not just strength alone.

This is my point in why Odin isn't necessarily stronger than Thor unless we see more evidence of his strength (like him being as strong as the Serpent will prove it).

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
You dirty mutherf*#%$!

Did you really just say that? After all the mind numbing nonsense you've spouted, did you honestly just try and use a showing of durability as a means to determine a gap in strength?

I fear for the safety of those around you.

There are exceptions to the rule as why I said, "Usually". I don't determine stronger by hits on each other since durability and skill and surprise also plays a role. Others do though, I was appealing to their logic more than my own.

My point was to show Thing hitting WWH in that manner either means he is as strong as WWH or that hitting damage alone can't determine it. That is why Odin is not necessarily stronger than Thor.

Originally posted by h1a8
I do too. I agree 100%. This is point I said in the earlier reply. I was appealing to other member's logic though as well.

Beating on someone and doing damage has to do with the entire combination of skill, durability, strength, and surprise (one not braced for impact) and not just strength alone.

This is my point in why Odin isn't necessarily stronger than Thor unless we see more evidence of his strength (like him being as strong as the Serpent will prove it).

i really don't think durability plays that much of a part in it, if any, unless it's implicitly stated that the person is punching something ridiculously resilient.

Originally posted by h1a8
There are exceptions to the rule as why I said, "Usually". I don't determine stronger by hits on each other since durability and skill and surprise also plays a role. Others do though, I was appealing to their logic more than my own.

Oh please, give it a rest already. You do a 180 regarding a point when it suits your need. I've seen it more than once, and I've used your own posts to shut you up.

If I gathered up your claims regarding certain topics, you'd probably be nicknamed the Top.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Honestly? No. I always tend to seperate strength and durability. Maybe that's just me.

😮‍💨