Kuurth & Nul vs Thanos

Started by Nihilist4 pages

Originally posted by Cogito
Logic says that if Kuurth can hurt Thanos even the tiniest bit, then he could put Thanos down eventually.

So yes, I do.

Dont honetsly see how he is gonna hurt Thanos.

Phyla was stated to be the Avatar of death not only by Maelstrom but also from Magus himself. At no point Maelstrom even suggested her being the Avatar of Death was a trick, and she only stopped being it, when her replacement arrived.

Phyla was an avatar of Death in every respect. The assumed difference between Thanos and Phyla has never been addressed on panel because it doesn't exist, Death never "naming" Phyla directly seems to be a no-factor. Find proof that they were different and then we talk.

Originally posted by Bentley
Phyla was stated to be the Avatar of death not only by Maelstrom but also from Magus himself. At no point Maelstrom even suggested her being the Avatar of Death was a trick, and she only stopped being it, when her replacement arrived.

Phyla was an avatar of Death in every respect. The assumed difference between Thanos and Phyla has never been addressed on panel because it doesn't exist, Death never "naming" Phyla directly seems to be a no-factor. Find proof that they were different and then we talk.

Ding dong... hello!

Originally posted by Bentley
Phyla was stated to be the Avatar of death not only by Maelstrom but also from Magus himself. At no point Maelstrom even suggested her being the Avatar of Death was a trick, and she only stopped being it, when her replacement arrived.
She was tricked into going to the church to releae Thanos as part of Oblivions plan, as they stated the wheels had been set in motion for the "end war"

Phyla was an avatar of Death in every respect. The assumed difference between Thanos and Phyla has never been addressed on panel because it doesn't exist, Death never "naming" Phyla directly seems to be a no-factor. Find proof that they were different and then we talk. [/B]
why dont you try finding some proof as to what purpose she served being "Deaths avatar", fact is she only served one purpose which was releasing Thanos which she was tricked into doing thinking it was Adam Warlock.

I think it was very clear why Phyla was a Death's Avatar, she played her role -fighting Warlock and freeing Thanos-, but she was still an avatar of Ceath, and she proved so when she escaped Adam Magus's prison, just after Magus called her Avatar of Death.

Now, how do you intend to disprove the fact she was an avatar of Death for some agenda, that is none of my problems. Proof seems to point out to the Avatar of Death role not being all that important in your average fight.