Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Considering he lifted weights dubbed "infinity" and the "sum of eternity", it's very much true. baka
That leans more on Hyperbole and it was a shared ft AND he needed assistance. Ultraman did the same thing "with ease" by himself.
What solo fts do you have? Herc did his ft by himself.
Originally posted by carver9
That leans more on Hyperbole and it was a shared ft AND he needed assistance. Ultraman did the same thing "with ease" by himself.What solo fts do you have? Herc did his ft by himself.
And Hercules lifting the universe isn't hyperbole? They're all unquantifiable.
Let's try some logical thinking and math. What's half of infinity?
Originally posted by wildernesss
Hercules lifting the universe by himself beats a shared feat accomplished with assistance.
Not really.
You're acting like Superman lifted a billion tons with help. He lifted infinite pages with help. And half, assuming it was a 50/50 effort, of infinity is....what?
Ultraman lifting it by himself doesn't invalidate it, either. And considering Superman is at the very least Ultraman's equal which has been shown God knows how many times in comics...well, it's hard not to put two and two together to get four.
And it goes without saying that Superman's entire history of strength feats as a whole eclipse Hercules.
Originally posted by Starscream M
half of infinity is infinitysuperman does not have infinite strength
No one is arguing Superman has infinite strength.
But Superman lifting half of infinity and half of the sum of eternity, both of which equal infinity and the sum of eternity, matches Hercules lifting the universe.
But if someone wants to argue that Hercules, based off of that feat, is the strongest here, you better damn well expect the flood gates to be unleashed considering how Hercules has fared against people in direct contests of strength, which the OP takes into consideration.
Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Not really.You're acting like Superman lifted a billion tons with help. He lifted infinite pages with help. And half, assuming it was a 50/50 effort, of infinity is....what?
Ultraman lifting it by himself doesn't invalidate it, either. And considering Superman is at the very least Ultraman's equal which has been shown God knows how many times in comics...well, it's hard not to put two and two together to get four.
And it goes without saying that Superman's entire history of strength feats as a whole eclipse Hercules.
it's a utterly ridiculous non-feat that negates itself with it's apparent lack of logic; if half of infinity is infinity there could BE no 50/50 sharing of the load since the "shared load" is infinite. If the shared load is infinite superman would not have required 50/50 assistance since it would make no difference.
it's either hyperbole or a metaphysical feat. not a strength feat.
Originally posted by wildernesss
it's a ridiculous non-feat that negates itself with it's apparent lack of logic; if half of infinity is infinity there could BE no 50/50 sharing of the load since the shared "load" is infinite. If the shared load is infinite the superman would not have required 50/50 assistance since it would make no difference.it's either hyperbole or a metaphysical feat. not a strength feat.
So Superman's feats are hyperbolic or metaphysical...but Hercules' isn't?
Explain that one to me.
Originally posted by carver9
Gladiator by far.😠
Originally posted by -Pr-
Superman or Hulk.lol @ anyone picking Gladiator though.
honestly.
Originally posted by carver9
That leans more on Hyperbole and it was a shared ft AND he needed assistance. Ultraman did the same thing "with ease" by himself.What solo fts do you have? Herc did his ft by himself.
it wasn't stated that assistance was needed. If you're going to make statements, at least TRY to back them up? Trolling isn't good.
Originally posted by carver9
Hulk strength ft...lol.Thanks Sundip.
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/23/1861416thorhammersuper4.jpg/
Do you know the context to that issue?
Originally posted by JakeTheBank
So Superman's feats are hyperbolic or metaphysical...but Hercules' isn't?Explain that one to me.
based on the fact that this superman feat makes less sense & is more ridiculous than the hercules feat. at least with the hercules feat there are no tricks or intellectual rhetoric. what you see is what you get. he stands up, raises his arms, & lifts the universe. it has all the appearances of a pure strength feat & there is no reason to take it as anything but such.
the superman feat is convoluted, illogical, & lacks the simplicity of the
hercules feat. the kind of simplicity that would go with a pure strength feat. so ya, while they MAY both be hyperbolic feats, the superman feat makes it look like the a garden variety rational feat
since superman does not have infinite strength.
Originally posted by wildernesss
based on the fact that this superman feat makes less sense & is more ridiculous than the hercules feat. at least with the hercules feat there are no tricks or intellectual rhetoric. what you see is what you get. he stands up, raises his arms, & lifts the universe. it has all the appearances of a pure strength feat & there is no reason to take it as anything but such.the superman feat is convoluted, illogical, & lacks the simplicity of the
hercules feat. the kind of simplicity that would go with a pure strength feat. so ya, while they MAY both be hyperbolic feats, the superman feat makes it look like the a garden variety rational feat
since superman does not have infinite strength.
So, Hercules lifting up the entire universe somehow makes more sense than Superman lifting infinity or the sum of eternity? How'd you get to that conclusion? Superman lifted up a book using his strength using his hands. Superman lifted up Spectre, cited as weighing the sum of eternity, with his arms. Sounds like the appearance of a pure strength feat. They're all absurd, hyperbolic, and unquantifiable.
Superman doesn't have infinite strength. Neither does Hercules. 👆
Originally posted by JakeTheBank
So, Hercules lifting up the entire universe somehow makes more sense than Superman lifting infinity or the sum of eternity? How'd you get to that conclusion? Superman lifted up a book using his strength using his hands. Superman lifted up Spectre, cited as weighing the sum of eternity, with his arms. Sounds like the appearance of a pure strength feat. They're all absurd, hyperbolic, and unquantifiable.Superman doesn't have infinite strength. Neither does Hercules. 👆
you're right, neither of them do.....but you seem to be implying superman does when you were trying to promote superman's feat with your "what is half of infinity?" posts over & over again. if you truly beleive superman does not have infinite strength why were using that feat against hercules feat? you would have disregarded the superman feat immediately if you truly felt that way.
