Gladiator vs Wolverine

Started by srankmissingnin11 pages

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Because Wolverine pierced Gladiator's shoulder once in an ambush? I guess Wolverine takes down Thanos in a straight melee fight also because he pierced his chest in an ambush.

I'm glad anybody who thinks Wolverine wins against Gladiator buys into penetrability w/o superspeed or healing = auto-win for Wolverine in H2H.

There are two versions of yourself fighting. One has super strength, and the other has the skills of Anderson Silva and foot long blades surgically grafted to his hands. You think the super strong version is going to win? Really?

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
There are two versions of yourself fighting. One has super strength, and the other has the skills of Anderson Silva and foot long blades surgically grafted to his hands. You think the super strong version is going to win? Really?
If one is capable of wrecking a planet with three punches, yes. So long as I don't want to be a phucking retard.

But, yea, whatever, Wolverine beats Thanos in a melee fight with his snikty-snikts.

Originally posted by Nihilist
😂 Who gives a shit what you think he does to Thanos as he aint in this Thread.
Clearly not you as you seem to have no issue with it. Penetrability w/o superspeed/healing = Wolverine auto-win in melee. I get it. Wolverine stabbed Thanos once. He somehow beats the Titan.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
If one is capable of wrecking a planet with three punches, yes. So long as I don't want to be a phucking retard.

But, yea, whatever, Wolverine beats Thanos in a melee fight with his snikty-snikts.

The strength is irrelevant until he connects, and the other fighter has a much higher probability of avoiding attacks, landing attacks, and finishing the fight with a single blow. Simple.

Thanos had both true invulnerability at the time of his last apparent death as well as a healing factor provided someone could actually damage him.

So, your argument is that Gladiator will never land a single hit on Wolverine?

You'll have to forgive srank, he's retarded.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
If one is capable of wrecking a planet with three punches, yes. So long as I don't want to be a phucking retard.

But, yea, whatever, Wolverine beats Thanos in a melee fight with his snikty-snikts. Clearly not you as you seem to have no issue with it. Penetrability w/o superspeed/healing = Wolverine auto-win in melee. I get it. Wolverine stabbed Thanos once. He somehow beats the Titan.

Whatever makes you feel better, make the thread if it acts as soothing cream for that butthurt you seem to be suffering from for some reason 🙂

^ Nice heel-turn. You're totally beng graceful about how you ended up endorsing Wolverine beating your boy in a melee fight and not randomly deflecting at all.

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
The strength is irrelevant until he connects, and the other fighter has a much higher probability of avoiding attacks, landing attacks, and finishing the fight with a single blow. Simple.

Thanos had both true invulnerability at the time of his last apparent death as well as a healing factor provided someone could actually damage him.

Right, a version of me with a sword has a great advantage over a version of me that throws mountains around.

Of course, you haven't backed away from my poking at all and now you can prepare yourself for the inevitability of having to argue that Wolverine beats a pre-Annihilation Thanos in a melee fight because that version of Thanos got stabbed in an ambush.

Everybody ready for the hilarity? Painful as it might be to watch? I certainly am after 6 pages of people trying to convince me Wolverine beats Gladiator.

Originally posted by Silent Master
So, your argument is that Gladiator will never land a single hit on Wolverine?

The argument is that Wolverine will connect with a higher percentage of punches he throws, avoid a higher percentage of punches his opponent throws, that his attacks will have a much higher probability of ending the fight instantly, and he can take an attack from his opponent better the alternative. In this scenario Wolverine has better damage soak, more effective offensive capabilities, range / skill advantages and a much higher critical strike chance. Gladiator could potentially BFR him, but Wolverine is more likely to drop him before that happens.

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
The argument is that Wolverine will connect with a higher percentage of punches he throws, avoid a higher percentage of punches his opponent throws, that his attacks will have a much higher probability of ending the fight instantly, and he can take an attack from his opponent better the alternative. In this scenario Wolverine has better damage soak, more effective offensive capabilities, range / skill advantages and a much higher critical strike chance. Gladiator could potentially BFR him, but Wolverine is more likely to drop him before that happens.

As Gladiator is strong enough to punch Wolverine into orbit..he only needs to land 1 punch. Therefore if you think that Wolverine wins, you must think that Gladiator will never land a single hit.

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
The argument is that Wolverine will connect with a higher percentage of punches he throws, avoid a higher percentage of punches his opponent throws, that his attacks will have a much higher probability of ending the fight instantly, and he can take an attack from his opponent better the alternative. In this scenario Wolverine has better damage soak, more effective offensive capabilities, range / skill advantages and a much higher critical strike chance. Gladiator could potentially BFR him, but Wolverine is more likely to drop him before that happens.
Like he dropped the Wrecker in New Avengers- ... oh, wait. Wrecker BFR'ed him twice over. Never mind.

I guess Wrecker superspeed blitzed Wolverine somehow.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Right, a version of me with a sword has a great advantage over a version of me that throws mountains around.

Of course, you haven't backed away from my poking at all and now you can prepare yourself for the inevitability of having to argue that Wolverine beats a pre-Annihilation Thanos in a melee fight because that version of Thanos got stabbed in an ambush.

Everybody ready for the hilarity? Painful as it might be to watch? I certainly am after 6 pages of people trying to convince me Wolverine beats Gladiator.

I know strength is much easier to quantify for the simple mind, but what do you imagine the version of you with a sword is doing in this melee scenario while the super-strong version of you is trying to lift a mountain? Eating Cheetos? Imagine rock - paper - scissors... only in this version it is an breakable self regenerating scissors who cuts rock as easily as it does paper. The math isn't hard to work out. Wolverine wins.

That version of Thanos still had a powerful healing factor, and molecular control over his body.

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
I know strength is much easier to quantify for the simple mind, but what do you imagine the version of you with a sword is doing in this melee scenario while the super-strong version of you is trying to lift a mountain? Eating Cheetos? Imagine rock - paper - scissors... only in this version it is an breakable self regenerating scissors who cuts rock as easily as it does paper. The math isn't hard to work out. Wolverine wins.
Wolverithmetics Rule #108: No matter how strong you are, even when you can destroy planets with your bare hands, you will lose to foot-long claws.
Originally posted by srankmissingnin
That version of Thanos still had a powerful healing factor, and molecular control over his body.
No, he didn't. And no, he doesn't. But go ahead and strip these imaginary/irrelevant powers from him anyway and prove to me how Wolverine kills Thanos in melee.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Like he dropped the Wrecker in New Avengers- ... oh, wait. Wrecker BFR'ed him twice over. Never mind.

I guess Wrecker superspeed blitzed Wolverine somehow.

Did the Wrecker beat Wolverine? No. He knocked him down the street a few times and Wolverine was off his game from Spider-woman's pheromones.

gladiator has already demonstrated the inability to KO logan with his superspeed; without it, wouldn't it stand to reason that logan would fair even better?

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
Did the Wrecker beat Wolverine? No. He knocked him down the street a few times and Wolverine was off his game from Spider-woman's pheromones.
Did Wolverine kill him before being BFR'ed twice? No. But I forgot, in between the panels, Wrecker superspeed blitzed him like Wonderman did.

Gladiator wins.

Originally posted by wildernesss
gladiator has already demonstrated the inability to KO logan with his superspeed; without it, wouldn't it stand to reason that logan would fair even better?

Who wins?

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Did Wolverine kill him before being BFR'ed twice? No. But I forgot, in between the panels, Wrecker superspeed blitzed him like Wonderman did.

It's only a BFR he can't return under his own powers. He wasn't BFR'd a single time in that fight, he was off his game because of Spider-woman, and unlike a forum match he wasn't blood lusted and actively working for a kill.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Who wins?

brawling gladiator without superspeed is essentially a thor without his hammer; logan was severely wounding thor, demonstrated greater reflexes & combat speed than thor, & was on the verge of defeating thor WITH his hammer.

I'd say the outcome of this fight is inconclusive; however, I think that fight with thor speaks for itself.

Originally posted by carver9
I don't know what it is but there is no indication that it was his claws...especially when we see Wolverine on the ground the next panel without his claws out.
seriously, this is retarded