Originally posted by Galan007
Being crippled, taking aeons to heal, and having their universe destroyed, equates to them having very little (if any) power remaining. That's the important part.
So you said the MAO were erased from existence in your earlier post, what you're saying now sounds nothing like what you posted earlier. You should at least try to be consistent with your stances.
Thanos regenerated from nothingness. There wasn't even a skeleton. Why did he regenerate? Because Drax destroyed him entirely with an anti-matter bomb, and his immortality resurrected him. Considering that has absolutely nothing to do with what I've been talking about, I'm not really sure why you keep bringing it up..?
What are you talking about? Thanos was not reduced to "nothingness", he was reduced to a charred skeleton. Go check TI#4 and re-read it before you make false assumptions. You clearly see the group staring at the charred skeleton talking about what just happened.
You don't see the connection that if Thanos can regenerate from a charred skeleton to a fully fleshed being, that he can't regenerate from being stabbed from the chest? I think the connection is clear.
Thanos is immortal. Obviously he's going to regen if a life threatening circumstance comes his way. What I'm talking about is a healing factor in the non-immortal sense. ie. Hulk punches Thanos in the face and breaks his nose. Does the nose heal instantly? Highly doubtful, as it's not a life threatening emergency that requires Thanos' 'immortal-factor' to kick in. Point being: Thanos can still sustain lasting damage--he just can't be killed.
So he only has a healing factor if he's supposedly near death? So his healing factor for some reason, according to you, is selective? Even if this is true (despite no evidence) what constitutes to "near-death" for Thanos? Being stabbed in the chest how many times? What about burning, how long does he have to burn before his healing factor starts? Him accumulating certain amount of wounds that won't heal because they're not "near-death" but then once it hits a magical number it becomes "near-death" and his healing factor kicks in?
So now you're establishing imaginary rules for his healing factor after you outright dismissed it even existing in the first place? Not only are you not consistent with your arguments, your theory for his "selective healing factor" requires how many unfounded assumptions? Too many for my taste. I'd rather just assume he gradually heals from his wounds decently fast in general.
Again, it's simple to connect the dots.Fact: The MAOs use their power to manifest a sword for Marv capable of puncturing Thanos' hide.
Fact: Death shows up and gesturely erases Marv, gesturely wipes out that universe, and gesturely renders the MAOs crippled and powerless.
Fact: Thanos immediately pops up afterward and his gaping wound is completely healed. Hell, there wasn't even a hole in his suit from where the sword had previously cut through, nor was there any visible blood on his face/clothing as there had been moments earlier. Is Thanos' "HF" so uber that it mends and cleans his clothing as well?
...My common sense is tingling. g007-psyduck
Again you ignored what I asked for. I ask you why his wound would disappear if the cancerverse is collapsing? Again all you've said so far is: they occurred at similar times therefore the cancerverse collapsing caused the wound to disappear. Okay, but why? Any reasons? You've provided none.
Also what gaping hole? Did you actually see the sword? It was really small compared to Thanos and looked like a short-sword, not a giant telephone pole. The reason why you don't see a "gaping hole" because that's not the type of wounds swords produce 😆
Again, it's much more likely that Thanos healed the stab wound because he has regenerated his flesh just prior to fighting Marv. Why wouldn't be be able to regenerate the stab wound to the chest?
Are you sure your common sense is tingling? Or is it having a chronic seizures? 😛