Superman vs Thor in Wrestling Contest (Winner by submission)

Who wins?

Thor

Split or slight edge to thor.

Thor.

Thor makes him tap.

The only top tier I can see beating Thor in such a contest is immortal Hercules and even that's extremely debatable as he has failed to subdue the Odinson every time barring Blood Oath.

Superman can use his speed to amp his double leg takedown.

No one said speed was equalized.

Also, its December. So its more in the Christmas spirit for Superman to win his threads for this month, when there is a clear clash in christmasy spirit.

Superman = Christmas. IMO.

Superman is much stronger than Thor, this is bordering on spite.

No, he's not, and no, this isn't spite.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
No, he's not, and no, this isn't spite.

Yes he is (by feats) and I didn't say it was spite.

Huh, since when Kal is MUCH stronger than thor? At best it's 10% difference between them.

Originally posted by h1a8
Yes he is (by feats) and I didn't say it was spite.

No, he isn't (by feats) and I know you didn't say it "was" spite. It's not spite and it's not even close to bordering on spite, either.

The strength advantage Kal likely has is, at best, noticeable but by no means insurmountable and at worse, negligible and not worth seriously arguing.

.

Originally posted by h1a8
Yes he is (by feats) and I didn't say it was spite.

shudduup

thor wins P

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
No, he isn't (by feats) and I know you didn't say it "was" spite. It's not spite and it's not even close to bordering on spite, either.

The strength advantage Kal likely has is, at best, noticeable but by no means insurmountable and at worse, negligible and not worth seriously arguing.

Is it because it would damage Thor's image?

Originally posted by abhilegend
Huh, since when Kal is MUCH stronger than thor? At best it's 10% difference between them.

Originally posted by h1a8
If Superman's best feats are several orders of magnitude greater than Thor's best feats then how in the hell is Superman not a lot stronger?

Is it because it would damage Thor's image?

How can Kal be 10% stronger when his best feats show orders of magnitude more strength?

Also what feat puts him magnitudes above thor anyway? I just posted one that would put him magnitudes above supe

Thor.

He should have the advantage here

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
Because we go by average, and thor and bill colliding there hammer shook the multiverse or something like that so no superman isnt stronger

The hammer incident had nothing to do with strength but the magic inside the hammers. If Thor and Masterson struck with adamantium hammers then nothing would have happened.

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
Also what feat puts him magnitudes above thor anyway? I just posted one that would put him magnitudes above supe

Maggeddon, Starbreaker, moving the Earth with WW and MM.
We only use quantifiable feats (where a lower bound of a feat is known).
The feat you named isn't a strength feat and if it was then it is unquantifiable.

Originally posted by h1a8
Maggeddon, Starbreaker, moving the Earth with WW and MM.
We only use quantifiable feats (where a lower bound of a feat is known).
The feat you named isn't a strength feat and if it was then it is unquantifiable.

You don't know what you are talking about.