Originally posted by h1a8
Maggeddon, Starbreaker, moving the Earth with WW and MM.
We only use quantifiable feats (where a lower bound of a feat is known).
The feat you named isn't a strength feat and if it was then it is unquantifiable.
You're not talking about when Superman, WW and MM were failing to hold the Earth in orbit and had to be saved by Kyle are you?
Originally posted by h1a8Thor and hercules nearly knocked the earth out of orbit in a arm wrestle... Thats just one arm of strength>>supermans feat
Maggeddon, Starbreaker, moving the Earth with WW and MM.
We only use quantifiable feats (where a lower bound of a feat is known).
The feat you named isn't a strength feat and if it was then it is unquantifiable.
Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
Thor and hercules nearly knocked the earth out of orbit in a arm wrestle... Thats just one arm of strength>>supermans feat
Let me give you a lesson here.
Someone can move the Earth with only 10lbs of strength provided they can fly and push long (time) enough. The key here is acceleration.
If someone accelerates the Earth at 1 cm/s^2 and another at 100000m/s^2 then the latter applied 10000000 times more strength.
Assuming we accept that the Thor/Hercules feat as canon (it came after the story) then since it took them all day just to shift the Earth out of orbit then it still took astronomically less force than say moving the Earth immediately with a large acceleration.
F=ma just so you know. The more the acceleration then the more the force that is needed.
Originally posted by -Pr-
The irony in this thread is astounding.Also, neither Thor nor Superman has any feat that puts them magnitudes above the other. If there was, we'd have seen it already.
I agree more or less.
The only top tier brick, that stands above them is clearly Lobo. Yeah I said it, Lobo has superior strength feats to either Supes, or Thor.
Originally posted by h1a8
Let me give you a lesson here.Someone can move the Earth with only 10lbs of strength provided they can fly and push long (time) enough. The key here is acceleration.
If someone accelerates the Earth at 1 cm/s^2 and another at 100000m/s^2 then the latter applied 10000000 times more strength.Assuming we accept that the Thor/Hercules feat as canon (it came after the story) then since it took them all day just to shift the Earth out of orbit then it still took astronomically less force than say moving the Earth immediately with a large acceleration.
F=ma just so you know. The more the acceleration then the more the force that is needed.
You cant give no lessons, because you don't know what the hell you are talking about. You talk out of your a$$, no one supports your off the wall logic that doesn't make any sense only to you which not saying much. You lack comic knowledge which is very obvious, you make claims that are not accurate at all,
Originally posted by abhilegend
^#facepalm#
I am dead phucking serious.
How much strength does it take to generate enough force, and crush an entire City? As the comic puts it. Trillion tons of matter compressed, into a bite size snack?
Whats this cagada of moving planets? Lobo slams characters carrying the weight of a stellar mass BIIAAATTCCHHH.
If it were a straight up fight I'd give the advantage to Superman because of strength. But this is a wrestling match. Wrestling is more about skill and technique than overall strength. Marius Pudzianowski(5 time Worlds Strongest Man) can pull a firetruck using only leverage and brute strength, that doesn't mean Randy Couture or Frank Mir couldn't make him tap. Thor wins easily.
Originally posted by "Id"
I agree more or less.The only top tier brick, that stands above them is clearly Lobo. Yeah I said it, Lobo has superior strength feats to either Supes, or Thor.
Lobo isn't stronger than Thor/Superman, much less clearly.
He had some feats that characters would be hard pressed to match or surpass due to the nature of the comic (There are some, Hercules/Heavens, Thor/World Engine, Superman/Infinite Book, Drax/Star etc.) but he isn't above other elite strong men.
I can't think of anything that equals a planet destroying fart though, too cartoony.
Originally posted by BrockalizerSpeed also plays a part. Not only would Thor be hard pressed to budge Superman's body but Superman will still be faster and maneuver much quicker.
If it were a straight up fight I'd give the advantage to Superman because of strength. But this is a wrestling match. Wrestling is more about skill and technique than overall strength. Marius Pudzianowski(5 time Worlds Strongest Man) can pull a firetruck using only leverage and brute strength, that doesn't mean Randy Couture or Frank Mir couldn't make him tap. Thor wins easily.
Originally posted by h1a8Opponents far weaker than Superman have "budged" him. As far as speed goes, sure I'm more than willing to concede that Superman has a faster travel speed, I have yet to see irrefutable proof that Superman's combat speed is superior. Superman isn't a wrestler, he's a brawler with heat vision, cold breath, that can take insane amounts of damage. Neither of those attributes will help against a foe that has wrestled for sport for hundreds of years.
Speed also plays a part. Not only would Thor be hard pressed to budge Superman's body but Superman will still be faster and maneuver much quicker.