Thor vs Gladiator-The Definitive Battle-Feat War

Originally posted by abhilegend
I'm not going to waste my time arguing why this is ridiculous or not. This is my BZ and I set up the rule. If you think it's not fair, do tell me how it's not.

Don't whine about it.

But if you refuse this, I'll take your concession on this and every Thorbag's along with you.

Take up your time. I'm in no hurry.

And your cowardice.

You still did not admit you were wrong? Figures, someone as cowardly as you? Nothing more is expected.

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
You saw it here folks. The big man needs stipulations to help him and is making ridiculous demands otherwise his opposition is a coward.

Why are these ridiculous stipulations? Thor has literally hundreds more appearances than Gladiator and the only way to gauge these two is with relative performance.

You're literate enough to know how that works, right?

The worst part is now he's gone from being stronger to just equal to or stronger. Forget all the full of bravado claims of being stronger. El Oh El.

If only you can read. That's my stance from the beginning.

Originally posted by abhilegend

I really doubt that. Only the character interactions matter and Gladiator looked superior to Thor or equal in almost all of them.

Originally posted by abhilegend

Also as Gladiator is a very prominent Superman clone, the chances of Thor looking stronger than Gladiator is almost zero. It's not his niche anymore.

The best Thor can hope is he is portrayed as equal in strength.

But your whole stance is "Thor is stronger because feats, hurr, durr".

So I can understand why you are running away from this BZ. Don't worry, I will not be throwing this BZ challenge to your face in every thread.

If you have any balls left, send me a PM if you want to do this BZ.

Or don't. You are not worth my time at this point.

I'm done with this thread. You can have your last word if you want.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Why are these ridiculous stipulations? Thor has literally hundreds more appearances than Gladiator and the only way to gauge these two is with relative performance.

You're literate enough to know how that works, right?

If only you can read. That's my stance from the beginning.

But your whole stance is "Thor is stronger because feats, hurr, durr".

So I can understand why you are running away from this BZ. Don't worry, I will not be throwing this BZ challenge to your face in every thread.

If you have any balls left, send me a PM if you want to do this BZ.

Or don't. You are not worth my time at this point.

I'm done with this thread. You can have your last word if you want.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Gladiator has an edge to Thor in strength these days.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Also as Gladiator is a very prominent Superman clone, the chances of Thor looking stronger than Gladiator is almost zero. It's not his niche anymore.

The best Thor can hope is he is portrayed as equal in strength.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Thor's strength is regularly show to be below many elites of marvel comics.
[B]

Originally posted by abhilegend
[B]Gladiator, Hyperion, Hulk, Sentry etc.

Originally posted by abhilegend
There you go. Three elites already stronger than Thor.

For one it's clear that you have always thought that Gladiator is stronger. You've even based your stance on faulty logic by claiming that just because Gladz is a Superman clone, he must be stronger blah blah blah. facepalm

Now you are crying because you want to limit Thor by cutting off many off his feats just because he has more? Wtf?! Hell Gladiator has been around since 1977 and has appeared in well over 600 issues. Gtfo of here! Not to mention changing the setting by with this equal to or stronger bullshiet. I expected nothing less from you. Smdh...

😂

Suffice to say, you proved that you don't have any balls left.

See you in the next Thor thread and again running away from everything.

You two love birds.

Originally posted by abhilegend
I'm done with this thread. You can have your last word if you want.

Sike!

Originally posted by abhilegend
😂

Suffice to say, you proved that you don't have any balls left.

See you in the next Thor thread and again running away from everything.

That truck is all the bs u've been spouting all thread long.

Honestly I don't see anything wrong with single writer comparative feats.

I will see disadvantage on pitting someone with 50 years of appearances on his tittle + avengers and guest appearances vs someone who has hardly has a dedicated comic book and barely makes guest appearances + that is treated as a B lister character most of the time.

There is no way to compete to the amount of feats one is going to get over time especially having so many writers. IMO

Plus it makes it easier and it would be interesting.

And I think everyone knows Thor will have an unfair advantage on a situation in which he is going to show all his history vs a guy who hardly has a comic tittle under his belt.

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
And I think everyone knows Thor will have an unfair advantage on a situation in which he is going to show all his history vs a guy who hardly has a comic tittle under his belt.

Then they shouldn't be trying to compete with him.

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
Honestly I don't see anything wrong with single writer comparative feats.

I will see disadvantage on pitting someone with 50 years of appearances on his tittle + avengers and guest appearances vs someone who has hardly has a dedicated comic book and barely makes guest appearances + that is treated as a B lister character most of the time.

There is no way to compete to the amount of feats one is going to get over time especially having so many writers. IMO

Plus it makes it easier and it would be interesting.

And I think everyone knows Thor will have an unfair advantage on a situation in which he is going to show all his history vs a guy who hardly has a comic tittle under his belt.

Characters represent a collection of a bunch writers, not just one.

Unless this is a concession that Thor would win, with all appearances allowed?

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
Honestly I don't see anything wrong with single writer comparative feats.

I will see disadvantage on pitting someone with 50 years of appearances on his tittle + avengers and guest appearances vs someone who has hardly has a dedicated comic book and barely makes guest appearances + that is treated as a B lister character most of the time.

There is no way to compete to the amount of feats one is going to get over time especially having so many writers. IMO

Plus it makes it easier and it would be interesting.

And I think everyone knows Thor will have an unfair advantage on a situation in which he is going to show all his history vs a guy who hardly has a comic tittle under his belt.

And did u not see his last second caveat? All he has to do is prove that Gladz is only at least equal to Thor.

Originally posted by Damborgson
Then they shouldn't be trying to compete with him.

Come on man, you know it will happen.

You simply can do it wirt a character that has so many comics vs one that gas less. It is unfair. But then limit one character to a certain point of view and then you have a different ball game.

Originally posted by Smurph
But it wasn't a proposed BZ for an interesting/difficult test of championing Thor vs Glads. It was supposed to determine who was stronger.

Characters represent a collection of a bunch writers, not just one.

Unless this is a concession that Thor would win, with all appearances allowed?

Same response as to Dambo.

It is an unfair comparison for the character that has less comics

Originally posted by celeyhyga17

That truck is all the bs u've been spouting all thread long.

Still salty, eh?

Originally posted by Smurph
But it wasn't a proposed BZ for an interesting/difficult test of championing Thor vs Glads. It was supposed to determine who was stronger.

Characters represent a collection of a bunch writers, not just one.

Unless this is a concession that Thor would win, with all appearances allowed?

By that logic, Thor is stronger than Thanos and Mangog and Superman is stronger than pretty much everyone.

You have to take comparative portrayals in account. That's the only thing which matters in comics.

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
What if I told u that instead lets bz Superman vs Anointed One and can only use the same writer(joe Kelly) that used them together? I take AO u take Superman.

And did u not see his last second caveat? All he has to do is prove that Gladz is only at least equal to Thor.

😂

Oh you poor, sad fanboy. I was saying from beginning.

"Gladiator is shown as equal or stronger than Thor in most of his appearances". Hence on average he is stronger.

Your claim is that Thor is stronger in all appearances because feats trump everything else.

You're just a moron at this point. And coward. But who is counting.

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
What if I told u that instead lets bz Superman vs Anointed One and can only use the same writer(joe Kelly) that used them together? I take AO u take Superman.

And did u not see his last second caveat? All he has to do is prove that Gladz is only at least equal to Thor.

Honestly I wont have any problem and it will be fair to AO because if I use all of SM history of strength feats it is obvious Superman will win.

I see the second point yes and I am or was aware if this changed or not since his original stance. But if it did change I will have a my reserves into doing it, specially because it will be easier to show that they have equal strength.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Last second caveat?

😂

Oh you poor, sad fanboy. I was saying from beginning.

"Gladiator is shown as equal or stronger than Thor in most of his appearances". Hence on average he is stronger.

Your claim is that Thor is stronger in all appearances because feats trump everything else.

You're just a moron at this point. And coward. But who is counting.

Yes. Thor is stronger based on feats. What a crazy notion.

Who am I kidding? You'll probably come up with more ridiculous stipulations.
At this point you've shown to everyone the kind of balls u have.

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
Honestly I wont have any problem and it will be fair to AO because if I use all of SM history of strength feats it is obvious Superman will win.

I see the second point yes and I am or was aware if this changed or not since his original stance. But if it did change I will have a my reserves into doing it, specially because it will be easier to show that they have equal strength.

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
Come on man, you know it will happen.

You simply can do it wirt a character that has so many comics vs one that gas less. It is unfair. But then limit one character to a certain point of view and then you have a different ball game.

But why does it have to be fair? If Thor has so much ammo that it becomes an unfair comparison, that speaks volumes as to who is stronger. Especially when you consider that Thor isn't even known for always displaying his physical stats because he usually carries Mjolnir with him. So its not 50+ years of showings that are usable, only a hand full really and he still beats out Gladiator.

Dont get me wrong, I do get your point, its just not as applicable as it would be to other characters.

Originally posted by Damborgson
But why does it have to be fair? If Thor has so much ammo that it becomes an unfair comparison, that speaks volumes as to who is stronger. Especially when you consider that Thor isn't even known for always displaying his physical stats because he usually carries Mjolnir with him. So its not 50+ years of showings that are usable, only a hand full really and he still beats out Gladiator.

Dont get me wrong, I do get your point, its just not as applicable as it would be to other characters.