Thor vs Gladiator-The Definitive Battle-Feat War

Started by abhilegend26 pages

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Sure thing.

After our gladz/thor first of course. It's only fair.


Only on my terms.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Only on my terms.

Lol. What was the point of all that bombastic posturing then?

What posturing? You just revealed the double standard in matching Thor/Gladiator and Thor/Mangog.

I was always ready to go in a BZ on my terms only.

Why are you so afraid if you are so certain that Thor is stronger than Gladiator?

What double standard? I already said ill bz u Thor Mangog? Wut in the phuk are u not getting? Keep making excuses.

I'm more than willing to say that going by the relative performance of a single writer that Glads would appear to be equal to or stronger... Are u willing to admit that going by forum standards(IE the totality of the characters history and feats under multiple writers) that Thor is without a doubt stronger?

Originally posted by abhilegend
Only on my terms.

😆

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW

😆

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW

😂 😂 😂 you should consider going into comedy my friend.

so wait, the much ballyhooed bz isn't happening because abhi doesn't want to compare overall strength but just apparent strength in their direct match ups? is that right? wouldn't that be like comparing superman and marvel and saying their strengths are almost exactly equal (at least preboot) since they were almost always shown as equals relative to one another...? 😕

Originally posted by leonidas
so wait, the much ballyhooed bz isn't happening because abhi doesn't want to compare overall strength but just apparent strength in their direct match ups? is that right? wouldn't that be like comparing superman and marvel and saying their strengths are almost exactly equal (at least preboot) since they were almost always shown as equals relative to one another...? 😕

And if that's how the comic depicts it, what's wrong with it?
Originally posted by celeyhyga17
What double standard? I already said ill bz u Thor Mangog? Wut in the phuk are u not getting? Keep making excuses.

You really don't see it, huh?
Originally posted by celeyhyga17
I'm more than willing to say that going by the relative performance of a single writer that Glads would appear to be equal to or stronger... Are u willing to admit that going by forum standards(IE the totality of the characters history and feats under multiple writers) that Thor is without a doubt stronger?

Maybe if we go by the highest showings only.

Even on the average all things considered, they look equal but Thor will have an edge due to the long list of higher showings.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW

😂

Originally posted by abhilegend

You really don't see it, huh?
Maybe if we go by the highest showings only.

Even on the average all things considered, they look equal but Thor will have an edge due to the long list of higher showings.


Let's try that again.

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
I'm more than willing to say that going by the relative performance of a single writer that Glads would appear to be equal to or stronger... Are u willing to admit that going by forum standards(IE the totality of the characters history and feats under multiple writers) that Thor is without a doubt stronger?

Since this encapsulates your whole idea of an "unfair" bz.

Yes you agree? Or no?

What do you not understand about my post? I said if you take random feats of strength in consideration Thor will have an edge in strength on average.

"Lifting" feats or whatever are irrelevant when you have an actual physical comparison between characters: Kurse, Mangog, Thanos, etc.

Gladiator is stronger.

Originally posted by abhilegend
What do you not understand about my post? I said if you take random feats of strength in consideration Thor will have an edge in strength on average.

Well u did muddy ure answer with words and phrases like "maybe" and "they look equal".

I'm basically trying to get a simplified answer. Is it a simple yes or no?

Originally posted by thanos-prime
"Lifting" feats or whatever are irrelevant when you have an actual physical comparison between characters: Kurse, Mangog, Thanos, etc.

Gladiator is stronger.


Exactly.
Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Well u did muddy ure answer with words and phrases like "maybe" and "they look equal".

I'm basically trying to get a simplified answer. Is it a simple yes or no?


I'm answering in the same way you did.

😬

Not undoubtedly stronger all the time. But yeah, some edge will be there in all the random strength feats for Thor.

He still hasn't destroyed a planet with his bare hands after all.

👆

Originally posted by abhilegend
Exactly.
I'm answering in the same way you did.

😬

Not undoubtedly stronger all the time. But yeah, some edge will be there in all the random strength feats for Thor.

He still hasn't destroyed a planet with his bare hands after all.

👆


In what way did I answer? On which question?

It's not about "all the time", or this time, or sometimes, etc. It's about over all. Yes or no? It's not that difficult of a question. If u refuse to give answer then just say it.

Destroying a planet is below what Thor has done. You would have seen some examples, but oh well.

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
In what way did I answer? On which question?

It's not about "all the time", or this time, or sometimes, etc. It's about over all. Yes or no? It's not that difficult of a question. If u refuse to give answer then just say it.

Destroying a planet is below what Thor has done. You would have seen some examples, but oh well.


I did say he had an edge on average. What do you think that means?

By his bare hands? Humor me, I'm aware about almost every Thor feat to date and I want to see you flail once more.