Rage.Of.Olympus
Senior Member
Originally posted by leonidas
no, i was saying his highs in STRAIGHT H2H are higher and vary more widely. thor has high end feats that may be better than lobo's, but his hammer plays an integral role in all those feats. i'm comparing his feats WITHOUT his hammer to lobo's.
Exactly what hand to hand showings does Lobo possess that puts him so distinctly above Thor?
Beating on Superman in their first encounter comes to mind but that's as much of an outlier as an injured Thor killing both Hulk and Thing in hand to hand. It's also less impressive.
IIRC, he once temporarily knocked out Captain Marvel with a sucker punch, which is pretty good I guess. On the other hand, Thor did the very same against Abomination who was definitely on that level physically at the time.
And I'm assuming you are aware that unless his charging his hammer with energy attacks or some such, his fists are a suitable substitute most of the time. Even under someone like Simonson. I'd even go so far as to use something like his battle with Dumb Drax despite Mjolnir if for no reason other than he couldn't have taken those punches in such stride if he was physically inferior.
Originally posted by leonidas
i agreed with that already. healing is not auto-win, but when all else is pretty equal between them, the healing is still a very large advantage.
It's really not the advantage you want it to be. Thor would most likely stalemate Lobo in hand to hand if they were to meet up pretending anything more than that is certain is just...well the evidence simply doesn't hold up from what I've seen.
A healing factor doesn't make one infallible. Even when a writer treats it as high end such as his appearances in R.E.B.E.L.S. Strife was still able to stalemate him.
Tbf, in the retconned fight, Lobo said he was healing faster than Superman was hurting him, the trade off however being was the one sided ass kicking.
Originally posted by leonidas
i'll not play the 'list characters each has beaten and who has beaten them' game. lobo has a long and impressive list, and he's got some lower showings as does thor. but most of thor's high end stuff is done via hammer. lobo has no such advantage. but i agree lobo takes a majority, though i'd say 7/10 to your less than that.
Trying to undermine Thor because he uses Mjolnir is silly, after Lee, it's a substitute for his fist on average. Writers have gone out of their way to highlight how dangerous he is without it such as his battles with Loki/Fenris, Juggernaut, Hrinmeer etc.
I'm still not sure what long list of victories Lobo has to put him above Thor.
He'll be lucky to take 6 out of 10.