Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Nah, I don't think so, because it only surrounded the blade.True, he does say that - but no different than when Juggy refers to 'his' power, rather than Cytorrak.
The Celestial implants were just that implants that allowed the Hulk to more efficiently use his power. If not Arch Angel would have been able to reach ridiculous levels of strength that he never could before. What Horseman of Apoc. ever had the strength of the Hulk? Not one.
As far as we can tell the sword was powered by gamma radiation, hence the green glow. I don't think that you are willing to concede so you continue to say no to the most logical explanation. I could be wrong, but that's the feeling that I am getting here. The book doesn't go into how the tech fully worked, and that just means that I could be right, or you could be.
Originally posted by Mshinu
Since it was shown spreading from the implants to his feet and later glowing selectively from the sword, that is not likely at all is it? Especially since Apoc commented on the sucess of the celestial tech just after on the same page.In attidion glow has a distinctive pattern of light green and dark green blobs that puts it apart, not the same that has been shown by Hulkie Boy without tech at any rate.
You're reaching, and as I stated above, this is simply a matter of opinion. The book never states anything on how the tech worked on any level concrete enough for you to hold such an adamant stance. It is my assumption, that the tech helped the Hulk to focus the power that he already had, and if he had no power than it would not work for him. The appendages were plugged into the Hulk, but in no way did i ever get the impression that they were pumping him full of some magical energy like Bane is pumped full of venom, but just the opposite, he was powering the tech, that cut off his inhibitions to just let loose.
This is going nowhere fast. I have an opinion, and others including you have yours, but the killer here, is that no one can fully prove their points because of the lack of evidence.