Bench Press Contest

Started by Starscream M16 pages

Originally posted by quanchi112
Firstly, It's a hyperbolic feat for one. Secondly, that Marvel is a peer based on this feat. Based on this feat Ultraman is stronger than both since he did it himself.

Thirdly, how aren't you getting this ?

Fourthly, now do you realize these feats never proved superiority in strength anyways.

I am getting this. but i want galan and jake to be consistent.

I take this feat as hyperbolic rubbish...one that doesn't illustrate superman's strength very well at all and I would never use this feat in a debate.

Again:

Originally posted by Galan007
This is a comic book. A comic book pertaining specifically to Superman's awesomeness. A comic book where it was explicitly stated Superman is > ALL... And you're questioning whether or not he could preform a particular feat? Gimme a break. srsly
It's really no more ridiculous than Superman saving the omniverse by vibrating, etc. It's unbelievability doesn't make it any less canon.

Originally posted by Starscream M
jake, its either a legitimate feat or its not. you cant pick and choose when you bring it up.

if you think its legitimate, then superman is on a strength tier with no peers.

if you don't think its legitimate, then you shouldnt bring it up even in a feat war thread.

It is a legitimate. He did it. shrug

It's also incredibly beyond anything he's ever done since.

Generally, I take entire showings and history and apply a rough average to determine where a character stands. I don't cite high end feats, especially unquantifiable ones in terms of versus battles because generally, they revolve around special context, plot device, or PIS at times.

If we're doing a feat war that is specifically asking for the best lifting feats, then yes, this feat counts. It means jack shit in a typical thread, though.

If you're trying to trap me by admitting that Superman is more powerful or Thor or something, by virtue of that feat alone and barring everything else, then, yes, that one feat shits on anything Thor or Hulk or whomever did.

But again, it's so far out of the norm, it's crazy.

Originally posted by Starscream M
I am getting this. but i want galan and jake to be consistent.

I take this feat as hyperbolic rubbish...one that doesn't illustrate superman's strength very well at all and I would never use this feat in a debate.

I don't think anyone outside an extremist would seriously try to use this feat as a legit argument for infinite strength. If you notice you don't hear any Ultraman fans or Marvel fans clamoring about it. That's probably due to these characters not having any fans but you still get my point.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It doesn't count to you either because he has a war hammer and was amped in the story.

Why are we going through this again Quan? On panel Hulk states that he and Nul are the same, they are one. That seems pretty clear to me.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I don't think anyone outside an extremist would seriously try to use this feat as a legit argument for infinite strength.
so then why are we even talking about this...why was it even brought up?

Originally posted by quanchi112
I don't think anyone outside an extremist would seriously try to use this feat as a legit argument for infinite strength. If you notice you don't hear any Ultraman fans or Marvel fans clamoring about it. That's probably due to these characters not having any fans but you still get my point.

Hey, I'm a fan of Captain Marvel. sneer

If it was the Captain Marvel of New Earth, I'd bring it up more often. biscuits

Originally posted by Galan007
Again: It's really no more ridiculous than Superman saving the omniverse by vibrating, etc. It's unbelievability doesn't make it any less canon.
so you're saying its canon that superman has infinite strength? lmfao

Originally posted by Galan007
Again: It's really no more ridiculous than Superman saving the omniverse by vibrating, etc. It's unbelievability doesn't make it any less canon.

I don't see anything wrong with Superman saving the omniverse by Vibrating. That's within his powerset. He had to match a frequency which could have been at the speed of sound, below or greater, no telling but he had to match a certain type of speed in order to achieve this ft. Not outside of his powerlevel...the infinite pages...too much surrounding it.

Jesus. facepalm

Originally posted by carver9
Why are we going through this again Quan? On panel Hulk states that he and Nul are the same, they are one. That seems pretty clear to me.
Hulk doesn't have a war hammer so no they aren't the same. It's the same character with an amp. Carver, I really want to believe you aren't this slow witted.

Originally posted by carver9
I don't see anything wrong with Superman saving the omniverse by Vibrating. That's within his powerset. He had to match a frequency which could have been at the speed of sound, below or greater, no telling but he had to match a certain type of speed in order to achieve this ft. Not outside of his powerlevel...the infinite pages...too much surrounding it.

Because that feat trumps Hulk's best?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Hulk doesn't have a war hammer so no they aren't the same. It's the same character with an amp. Carver, I really want to believe you aren't this slow witted.

I already admitted to you he had a versatility amp. You are missing my point.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Hulk doesn't have a war hammer so no they aren't the same. It's the same character with an amp. Carver, I really want to believe you aren't this slow witted.
I work with a guy who thought half of 10 was 3.

I have lost all hope for people I previously thought were trolling on this forum since I know people can be this... slow.

Originally posted by carver9
I already admitted to you he had a versatility amp. You are missing my point.
The scan already said he was more powerful. This is why people don't take you seriously. You don't understand the comics and simple sentences.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Because that feat trumps Hulk's best?
no, you're so hung up on hulk you're missing the point. the feat is invalid because we know superman does not have limitless strength...jeez, jake, its not some crazy conspiracy to deny superman that feat its legitimacy.

Originally posted by Galan007
g007-psyduck

If the book was weightless, Superman would not have needed Captain Marvel's help to lift it.

The book wasn't weightess, the pages within the binding were. Infinite tangible pages would mean infinite mass and area, yet those pages didn't take up all the room in the entire universe and then some, and also fit within the confines of the book's binding, which was a finite space. The pages were a massless never ending magical construct. The only thing they lifted of actual substance was the binding, which had an undefined, yet apparently immense, amount of weight.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Because that feat trumps Hulk's best?

Naah, that's not why. One of the most powerful beings in the universe stated Hulk has infinite strength. I already told you my thoughts on that Jake.

Originally posted by Starscream M
so you're saying its canon that superman has infinite strength? lmfao
Superman Beyond is a canon comic. In that comic Superman/Marvel and Ultraman lifted a book with an infinite amount of pages.

It's canon whether you like it or not. If you don't like/agree with it, email Grant Morrison.

Originally posted by Galan007
Superman Beyond is a canon comic. In that comic Superman/Marvel and Ultraman lifted a book with an infinite amount of pages.

It's canon whether you like it or not. If you don't like/agree with it, email Grant Morrison.

canon does not mean legitimate though

PIS feats that are canon are still not considered valid evidence of any sort

and this feat (if you posit the book to be infinite weight) is PIS on the highest order