Re: Re: Re: CISless Thor (no hammer) vs CISless WBH
Originally posted by TheHulk
Just Admit you have been burned
Lol?
Carv's trying to make a point here by removing Mjolnir and pitting him against WBH. Anyone sane will agree that Thor obviously needs the hammer to beat, let alone stand a chance against him. Handicapping Thor so Hulk can win isn't any skin off of my teeth. If anything, it's just sad that Carv feels the need to make an obvious spite/bait thread to prove what we already know.
Thor using all of his powers and abilities with Mjolnir instead of just brawling > Hulk.
Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Lol?Carv's trying to make a point here by removing Mjolnir and pitting him against WBH. Anyone sane will agree that Thor obviously needs the hammer to beat, let alone stand a chance against him. Handicapping Thor so Hulk can win isn't any skin off of my teeth. If anything, it's just sad that Carv feels the need to make an obvious spite/bait thread to prove what we already know.
Thor using all of his powers and abilities with Mjolnir instead of just brawling > Hulk.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Hulk wins. Carver, with Thor being your favorite character why are you so upset when people argue for him over the Hulk ?
It was actually my idea for Carver to make this thread. It was also prompted by Silent Master's attempt at making Damborgson's thread one sided. Just read his last posts pertaining to the subject, and you will see why.
Originally posted by StoicSilent Master doesn't ever actually contribute he just demands you prove your case for him. He's a lot more blatant on herochat about his agenda but goes under the radar over here. Herochat is currently down hence his involvement here.
It was actually my idea for Carver to make this thread. It was also prompted by Silent Master's attempt at making Damborgson's thread one sided. Just read his last posts pertaining to the subject, and you will see why.
