The Death of Annie Dryden

Originally posted by Zeal Ex Nihilo
Transgenderism is their current target, and then perhaps incest.

I agree about the transgenderism. The most extreme progressives want a truly egaltarian society that is gender neutral or gender blind.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2010/08/16/life-without-gender.html

That's not that bad of an idea, however. With technology, it will be possible to create 5 or more genders. We can make ourselves an entirely different species, if we want. So this is inevitable. Think of the die-hard nerd that will have enough money to go through the gene-therapy required to turn themselves into a Xenomorph? Don't believe me? It WILL happen. We are right on the edge of being able to do whatever the **** we want with genes and gene expression. So this is why I think we will lose the classic sense of gender. We will transcend gender, technically.

In an old world, that would be stupid and impractical. In a not-to-distant future, it will be do-able.

Incest will not matter. In fact, it practically does not matter, now...as long as they are both consenting adults. And most Christians believe humanity sprung from massive amounts of incest, anyway: Adam and Eve's children. 😐

Originally posted by Zeal Ex Nihilo
First of all, there may come a time when churches are forced to perform gay marriages.

Why would you assume this would happen? Churches aren't required to marry any kind of group. They never have been. Once progressives forced people to accept negros as humans there was never a push to require churches to accept them. The same law that made gay marriage legal in New York also specifically made it illegal to force churches to marry anyone they don't want to.

As far as I know churches have been irrelevant in the gay marriage issue. Any church can marry anyone the owners want, it just has no legal standing whatsoever. I know a couple who had an issue with this. They got married purely through a church and the government threw a fit when she started filling out forms with a different last name.

Originally posted by dadudemon
1. I don't think you quoted the correct person.

If you really did direct that towards me, you're either 2. trolling or an 3. idiot; my money is on 2 (possibly 1) because that's your favorite thing to do.

Edit - You're right: it's 69% or 86.6%, not 74%. My bad. 😐

http://www.ncdsv.org/images/PrevalenceIn-ServicePost-ServiceSexualAssault.pdf

The original number came from the article I posted on the last page...but that one was 71%. 😐

Yeah, you definitely quoted the wrong person.

Edit - On second thought, you did intend to quote me. You probably live on the East Coast of the US. It's a bit different here in the Bible Belt. Yes, young, stupid men say shit like that quite frequently...especially shortly after the terror events that occurred on 9-11. I'll be flexible and assume that you just don't know that many people that are serving or have served in the military.

This is a strawman and is not what I paraphrased from...wait for it...real life people that joined the marines.

While I do appreciate you reposting what inimalist and I have already posted, it is unnecessary. But I'd like to point out that women face more than just "one more" consequence in military service, above and beyond their male counterparts.

I'd choose 3

3. Stay out of the military and go to college for years and years.

you could have spent much less energy missing the point.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
you could have spent much less energy missing the point.

You could have just conceded those points instead of pretending you weren't wrong.