Originally posted by JakeTheBankbecause the logic is simply faulty. There are too many factors involved to simply say he can kill unkillables so he can kill them because they're unkillable. There needs to be more to it. Mainly how is he gonna kill them and what is he gonna do to keep them dead. He says he doesn't think they could resist DC's death but all evidence points to them being beyond death in this sense. Using just his logic thanos could beat the presence, and toaa, because they're unkillable and he can kill unkillables.
Why do you feel that?In a neutral setting, I have no problem giving Thanos the benefit of the doubt that he could kill "immortal" beings (provided he had the power to do so and wasn't beaten before then). The problem is that Mordru (and Phantom Stranger) aren't really immortal in the traditional comic book sense.
Death really has no meaning for either of them. DC Zeus is immortal, Guardians of the Universe are immortal, Highfather is immortal, etc. Mordru has no timeline and no beginning or end. He just...is, I guess. And Phantom Stranger is likewise above and beyond concepts of life and death.
Now, if you were arguing that Thanos could beat them through KO or incapacitation or whathaveyou, I'd have no issues with that. I wouldn't agree, but both Stranger and Mordru have been beaten before, so the idea of them losing in the general sense isn't crazy. But killing them? I just don't see it happening from Thanos.