When did you discover sex...?

Started by Bardock424 pages

Originally posted by Astner
Hey, want to know one of my most embarrassing secrets? Read this post!

When I was six or seven years old I and a girl from my class who lived close to me were playing in a forest close to where we lived. She got an idea for a game--guess what it was called--and that's questionably where I lost my virginity. We laid on top of each other with our pants pulled down with A inside B, until we got bored and did something else.

I much like to prefer that I lost my virginity when I was 14 or 15, depending whether or not getting head counts. Where there were actual motion and ejaculation, but I digress.

Yeah, I'm editing this post in 14 minutes.

Don't worry, I screen-capped it.

As soon as you go on to correct a minor misspelling, a new opportunity of ridicule opens up for the forum troll...

Originally posted by Astner
As soon as you go on to correct a minor misspelling, a new opportunity of ridicule opens up for the forum troll...

lol, that's clever. Though, again, I screen capped it.

ah the old "dude, i got laid when i was little" story. oh man i think the last time i heard that one was in middle school.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
ah the old "dude, i got laid when i was little" story. oh man i think the last time i heard that one was in middle school.

Yeah, it's pretty ridiculous.

What the **** just happened.

Originally posted by NemeBro
What the **** just happened.

Bardock saw that I edited one of my posts, got creative and decided to write me a backstory. None of that actually happen. It's just another petty attempt of raising drama.

Ah. Now I get what your previous post, the one after Bardock's, was referring to.

Originally posted by NemeBro
What the **** just happened.

Astner posted that story (I read it a few minutes after he posted it) then edited it out for no apparent reason. Bardock recorded his really stupid story for posterity. If you're wondering about the truth just look at the times of the posts.

3:54 Astner posts
4:02 Bardock quotes him
4:04 Astner edits his post

Even without having seen the events you can see that his story doesn't hold up at all.

I was willing to give Astner the benefit of the doubt.

At least, until Bardock stops being a sissy and posts the screencap. estahuh

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Astner posted that story (I read it a few minutes after he posted it) then edited it out for no apparent reason. Bardock recorded his really stupid story for posterity. If you're wondering about the truth just look at the times of the posts.

3:54 Astner posts
4:02 Bardock quotes him
4:04 Astner edits his post

Even without having seen the events you can see that his story doesn't hold up at all.


"Last edited by Bardock42 on Yesterday at 10:14 PM"

That was 8 minutes after I edited my post.

"Last edited by Astner on Yesterday at 10:06 PM"

Initially his post wasn't referring to my post at all. What's with all the hate?

Originally posted by NemeBro
I was willing to give Astner the benefit of the doubt.

At least, until Bardock stops being a sissy and posts the screencap. estahuh

I think I prefer it ambiguous.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I think I prefer it ambiguous.

You may not want to prefer it that way because it would be a clear case of trolling. Meh, he probably didn't report it to the mods but faking that text would be easy for even a newb. The only way to prove that the image you took was legit is if it had a hash value that matched an KMC side hash value. It would be impossible to match both of them unless the "screen cap" was standardized to the same format and dimension.

Basically, your screen cap means crap but not posting and saying you want to leave it 'unknown' is also trolling. So you were doomed from the beginning.

Here's your way out: SC said he saw it, too. That's as close as you will get to legit nonrepudiation but is easy to "conspire" to accomplish.

So I do not know who to believe.

Originally posted by dadudemon
So I do not know who to believe.

Ignoring that most members on the site despises me, and that there's no reliable evidence. Let's assume that I actually wrote it.

What would that mean to you?

In fact I have a hard time figuring out the purpose of the story. I find it neither insulting nor discrediting.

Originally posted by Astner
Ignoring that most members on the site despises me...

...on account of you being a notorious troll.

Oh, lol, it r like the Reichstag!

Originally posted by Astner
Ignoring that most members on the site despises me, and that there's no reliable evidence. Let's assume that I actually wrote it.

What would that mean to you?

In fact I have a hard time figuring out the purpose of the story. I find it neither insulting nor discrediting.

It could be interpreted as you trying to brag about getting laid at seven I guess.

Originally posted by Astner
In fact I have a hard time figuring out the purpose of the story. I find it neither insulting nor discrediting.

Nor do I. I assume most kids play "doctor" or things similar to it. It's just natural curiosity.

I played "Dahmer" myself.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
...on account of you being a notorious troll.

When you're lying in an attempt to ridicule someone, it's best not to display a bias against the one you're ridiculing. It reduces your credibility as a witness.

But yes, the story is ridiculous and I won't address it further.

Originally posted by Astner
When you're lying in an attempt to ridicule someone, it's best not to display a bias against the one you're ridiculing. It reduces your credibility as a witness.

I'm not ridiculing you I'm just saying people don't like you because you're well known as a troll.