Immortal Hercules vs... Classic Thor

Originally posted by PillarofOsiris
Did you know Spiderman has a winning record over the Hulk if we go by fights between the two? If we're basing everything on fights I can make some REALLY ridiculous claims over who would beat who.

Did you know Thor 98% of the time fights like a complete moron who doesn't even remember 199 of his 200 powers? Have you seen how much different Thor and Hercules are treated when you compare common enemies? And if you want to start comparing feats we can go that way too.

thats only due to mjolnir....without it they are equal, with herc having an edge in h2h

If we want to go with the more extreme showings, Hercules might have a skill edge but Thor's stat edge trumps it.

Originally posted by leonidas
😂

whew.....

Thor.

Thor.

People are picking thor why?
It is a split.
Both are equally as strong skilled so why are people saying thor wins???

Originally posted by PillarofOsiris
Did you know Spiderman has a winning record over the Hulk if we go by fights between the two? If we're basing everything on fights I can make some REALLY ridiculous claims over who would beat who.

Did you know Thor 98% of the time fights like a complete moron who doesn't even remember 199 of his 200 powers? Have you seen how much different Thor and Hercules are treated when you compare common enemies? And if you want to start comparing feats we can go that way too.

Because Thor has better striking feats with Mjolnir than Hercules has with his mace.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Because Thor has better striking feats with Mjolnir than Hercules has with his mace.

1. It doesnt necceraily mean he can strike harder than hercules because hercules hardly uses the mace but whaever
2. Both the mace and mljonir will most often hit each other in this fight causing damage to no one.
3. I believe they fought like this in comics and stalemated
4. Only the second fight is with weapons

Mjolnir can definitely strike with far greater force than his Adamantine mace but I'm assuming Thor approaches this fight as he usually would in the comics. Meaning he wouldn't even use Mjolnir as a throwing weapon (Which in itself is enough to give him the win) and so on.

He'd bring himself down to Hercules' level which should make this a split generally.

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
It really doesnt matter since

1. It doesnt necceraily mean he can strike harder than hercules because hercules hardly uses the mace but whaever
2. Both the mace and mljonir will most often hit each other in this fight causing damage to no one.
3. I believe they fought like this in comics and stalemated
4. Only the second fight is with weapons

Well...

1. It does matter since via feats, Mjolnir > Adamantine mace in terms of destructive capabilities. Hercules not having the feats doesn't mean he gets the benefit of the doubt as his weapon is decidedly more inferior than Mjolnir.

2. Mjolnir will mess Hercules up more than Herc's mace would mess Thor up if they were to trade blows with one another.

3. K. Thor still has the better feats with Mjolnir, even with only melee feats allowed.

4. K. Thor has overall better feats than Hercules, so...

I dont get it, they stalemate in comics but somehow thor is superior via feats??
but they stalemated in comics.

I guess silver surfer> thor based on superior feats regardless of there fights.

Thor does have better feats overall and physically he's above Herc

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
I dont get it, they stalemate in comics but somehow thor is superior via feats??
but they stalemated in comics.

I guess silver surfer> thor based on superior feats regardless of there fights.

Thor is superior. Like I said, this should be a split but make no mistake, it's only like this because Thor brings himself down to Hercules' level.

I'd love to see you prove that.

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
I dont get it, they stalemate in comics but somehow thor is superior via feats??
but they stalemated in comics.

I guess silver surfer> thor based on superior feats regardless of there fights.

What's not to get?

Thor has a vastly superior resume than Hercules when you take into account his entire history of feats. Yes, Hercules has battled Thor to a draw more than once and even got the edge in H2H in Blood Oath - the only time I can remember that specifically mentions Hercules being superior to Thor if only just in that arena - but Thor also fights down to Hercules' level (ie. brawling and using only melee tactics).

You'd be wrong that Surfer > Thor, anyway.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
What's not to get?

Thor has a vastly superior resume than Hercules when you take into account his entire history of feats. Yes, Hercules has battled Thor to a draw more than once and even got the edge in H2H in Blood Oath - the only time I can remember that specifically mentions Hercules being superior to Thor if only just in that arena - but Thor also fights down to Hercules' level (ie. brawling and using only melee tactics).

You'd be wrong that Surfer > Thor, anyway.

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
Why would i be wrong when im using the same logic you are using?

Because Surfer isn't > Thor.

Split maybe a slight edge to herc

Originally posted by PillarofOsiris
Did you know Spiderman has a winning record over the Hulk if we go by fights between the two? If we're basing everything on fights I can make some REALLY ridiculous claims over who would beat who.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Because Surfer isn't > Thor.

so silver surfer>thor because surfer has better feats, despite there fights. if this is wrong then your logic is flawed so stop using it.