I think the question is obvious, myself (referring to the Argument between Shakya and OV):
"Can a nuclear blast spread fallout around the Earth?"
The answer is yes. I know this for a fact. Radioactive particles can spread all over earth (along the path, generally, of the jetstream around the area that the blast occurred) after a nuclear blast.
There, argument settled.
Originally posted by dadudemon
I think the question is obvious, myself (referring to the Argument between Shakya and OV):"Can a nuclear blast spread fallout around the Earth?"
The answer is yes. I know this for a fact. Radioactive particles can spread all over earth (along the path, generally, of the jetstream around the area that the blast occurred) after a nuclear blast.
There, argument settled.
What I doubt is that fallout can be spread from a single weapon that has any consequence to people thousands of miles from the source.
His original point was that the consequences would be "dire"...so to say "aha! see! trace amounts can be spread that can be detected if you're looking for them!" validates his original point is moving the goal post.
Originally posted by Omega Vision
I don't think that argument is relevant to what we were really discussing. Or what I was trying to discuss.What I doubt is that fallout can be spread from a single weapon that has any consequence to people thousands of miles from the source.
His original point was that the consequences would be "dire"...so to say "aha! see! trace amounts can be spread that can be detected if you're looking for them!"
Oh, I would agree, there. But I figured I would answer the question at face-value since no satisfaction would ever be gained from either party (and I hate dangling participles...and arguments.)
Obviously...the REAL question is "would such a fallout significantly affect people"? The answer to that is emphatically, "no." You end up experiencing more radiation during a fun outdoor summer day than you will in a life-time from any of the Soviet or US detonated bombs (depending on where you live). That should answer the question in the way you wanted it answered....no?
Originally posted by dadudemon
Oh, I would agree, there. But I figured I would answer the question at face-value since no satisfaction would ever be gained from either party (and I hate dangling participles...and arguments.)Obviously...the REAL question is "would such a fallout significantly affect people"? The answer to that is emphatically, "no." You end up experiencing more radiation during a fun outdoor summer day than you will in a life-time from any of the Soviet or US detonated bombs (depending on where you live). That should answer the question in the way you wanted it answered....no?
Originally posted by Mr ParkerNo I mean from the view of they control our government now.the majority of congress is bought off and paid for.watch this video,click on at the bottom where it says OBAMAS BONDAGE TO BIBI.watch how obama lets the prime minister of israel rule the roost at the white house and how obama is clearly angry at it all 😆 and how at the end,everyone in congress stands up and applaudes israels prime minister.they are all bought off and paid for by israel.we cannot be a free country again where the government serves us instead of us serving the government like we do now until we get rid of the zionest hold on congress.
I just now noticed the link I thought I posted did not get posted.my bad.Here it is with all that stuff i was talking about above.
Iran Worried U.S. Might Be Building 8,500th Nuclear Weapon
http://www.theonion.com/articles/iran-worried-us-might-be-building-8500th-nuclear-w,27325/
Lol
Originally posted by Mairuzu
Iran Worried U.S. Might Be Building 8,500th Nuclear Weaponhttp://www.theonion.com/articles/iran-worried-us-might-be-building-8500th-nuclear-w,27325/
Lol
and they are trying to say Iran is the threat. 🙄 Did you see that that video below it with the corporate owned media pushing Newt for president?
yeah that would be great,the buddie of slick willie clinton,a mass murderer who once ran our country,a buddie of his running our country.nice.
I don't think anyone running for President seriously thinks that Iran is ONLY after a weapon. What they say and what they think (especially for Romney and Gingrich) are two different things.
I think it's fairly clear that Iran is trying to build a nuclear weapon, what I disagree with is the idea that (1) it's purpose would be to launch an offensive strike against Israel (if North Korea hasn't nuked South Korea by now then I doubt Iran would be crazier) and (2) that they're not also pursuing legitimate nuclear power.