DC's Angels Vs Marvel's Cosmics

Started by Prep-Man18 pages

Originally posted by Galan007
Zop, I'm honestly not going to discuss this with you any longer.

Please read the issues for YOURSELF, then come back and given a more intelligent opinion.

He probably still wouldn't understand it.

DC angels win hands down

Originally posted by Prep-Man
Yeah, like the women have the power to do that. Get real.
Originally posted by Galan007
Zop, I'm honestly not going to discuss this with you any longer.

Please read the issues for YOURSELF, then come back and given a more intelligent opinion.

For God's sake, are you two even reading the posts? This is what Galan said :

quote: (post)
Originally posted by zopzop
Do you want me to quote what you said previously?

This still doesn't excuse the usurption of the Presence's "male" aspect by Carnivore.

quote:
Approximated:
Come close or be similar to something in quality, nature, or quantity.

As for the rest, your trolling astounds. One aspect of the Presence canceling out the other is certainly not a 'low showing' for the Presence itself. laughing out loud


Now he says the power was "given" to them. That's not what "approximate" means, by the very definition he provided.

So did the three CREATED beings "approximate" the feminine aspect of the SUPREME being or did the SUPREME being GIVE them power over that aspect of itself?

This isn't hard. It's either one or the other.

Originally posted by the Darkone
DC angels win hands down

That's pretty much the general opinion.

Christ, are you even reading my posts?:

Originally posted by Galan007
I said the women approximated the female aspect of the Presence. "Approximated" simply means "gained". How did they "gain" said power? It was given to them.
Originally posted by -Pr-
How is it sad? What he said does nothing to make the Presence look bad. At all.

PR, this is getting scarey now.

IF the Presence is the Supreme Being of DC, the events that Galan described taking place during the Carnivore arc SHOULD NOT have been possible.

How can a created being, Carnivore, "usurp" the male aspect of the Presence?

How can three created beings, Supergirl and crew, "approximate" the female aspect of the Supreme Being?
*Now he's saying control of that aspect was "given" to them. Which is it?

How could this 'approximation' of the Supreme Being's feminine aspect overcome the actual masculine aspect in possession of Carnivore?

That's THREE logic fails right there. This again assumes Galan is relaying the events that took place in that story correctly.

Originally posted by Galan007
Christ, are you even reading my posts?:

Yet you provided a definition that doesn't say what you meant. Nice job.

Yes, this is getting scary. So stop posting, already.

Originally posted by zopzop
Yet you provided a definition that doesn't say what you meant. Nice job.
I honestly feel like you're trolling for the sake of trolling at this point.

Originally posted by Galan007
I honestly feel like you're trolling for the sake of trolling at this point.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by zopzop
Do you want me to quote what you said previously?

This still doesn't excuse the usurption of the Presence's "male" aspect by Carnivore.

quote:
Approximated:
Come close or be similar to something in quality, nature, or quantity.

As for the rest, your trolling astounds. One aspect of the Presence canceling out the other is certainly not a 'low showing' for the Presence itself. laughing out loud

You posted that right? Now you say approximated means "given". Yet you accuse me of trolling?

Just stop, you're digging your own grave. 🙁

Originally posted by Galan007
I honestly feel like you're trolling for the sake of trolling at this point.
Thanks for proving my point.

Originally posted by zopzop
You posted that right? Now you say approximated means "given". Yet you accuse me of trolling?

He said gained.

Originally posted by Prep-Man
Just stop, you're digging your own grave. 🙁

By quoting what the poster said and then asking him to clarify how the the definition HE provided conflicts with what he's trying to convey "approximate" means?

The three created beings either

a) "approximated" the feminine aspect of the Supreme Being on their own

or

b) the Supreme Being GAVE them control over it's feminine aspect

It can't be both. Which one is it? Then we can continue this discussion.

You wanna troll? Well, I can troll with the best of them.

Can you summarize what is a feminine aspect?

Why are my posts still being argued when I already CLARIFIED them?

Originally posted by -Pr-
He said gained.

This is what he said -

Originally posted by Galan007
You're acting like a buffoon. I said the women approximated the female aspect of the Presence. "Approximated" simply means "gained". How did they "gain" said power? It was given to them.

Said power was then used to cancel out Carnivore. I just wish I could write this in crayon--I feel like that's the only way you'll comprehend what I'm saying.

this as the definiton of "approximate" he provided

quote:
quote: (post)
Originally posted by zopzop
Do you want me to quote what you said previously?

This still doesn't excuse the usurption of the Presence's "male" aspect by Carnivore.

quote:
Approximated:
Come close or be similar to something in quality, nature, or quantity.

As for the rest, your trolling astounds. One aspect of the Presence canceling out the other is certainly not a 'low showing' for the Presence itself. laughing out loud

Which is it?

Did they

a) 'approximate' the power of the feminine aspect of the Supreme Being on their own?

or

b) was authority over the feminine aspect of the Supreme Being GIVEN to them by the Supreme Being itself.

It's a simple question. Because if it's a) we got problems.

Originally posted by zopzop
This is what he said -

this as the definiton of "approximate" he provided

Which is it?

Did they

a) 'approximate' the power of the feminine aspect of the Supreme Being on their own?

or

b) was authority over the feminine aspect of the Supreme Being GIVEN to them by the Supreme Being itself.

It's a simple question. Because if it's a) we got problems.

YouTube video

Originally posted by Prep-Man
YouTube video

It's

[youtube ]the part of the link after the = sign [/youtube]

In your case the part after the = sign is : gA6hZ4f34II

hence :
YouTube video