Superman vs Thor

Originally posted by DarkOdin
Now Thor being a god has a higher resist to magic based attacks and he still got Koed. And Iam not even go to use the Supes is weak to magic but Thor is more resist then most

Originally posted by Hattie94
And Iam not even go to use the Supes is weak to magic but Thor is more resist then most.

hm DarkOdin alt, maybe?

But anyways, Wonder Woman's more resistant to magick than Superman, too. Didn't stop him from taking mystical attacks better than her on at least two occasions(well, one he looks better than her after taking context into account).

Originally posted by Delta1938
And what makes you think Thor is "very close" to Superman in durable?

Thor withstood the Gem Of Infinite Suns.As for the topic, I can imagine Superman getting KO'ed by that attack.Those Norn Stones just provides ridiculous ampage.Hence why Thor got KO'ed.

Originally posted by carver9
My bad, I meant to say, Thor wasn't koed from the attack and Delta, thanks for the scans, about to read your post now.

You're welcome. And are you ever going to tell me why you asked why I hadn't been banned yet or whatever the wording was?

Originally posted by Igniz
Thor withstood the Gem Of Infinite Suns.

That was an extremely detailed reason.

Originally posted by Delta1938
You're welcome. And are you ever going to tell me why you asked why I hadn't been banned yet or whatever the wording was?

I just woke up and I was talking crazy. I think I fussed at a good buddy of mine on here after I said that to you. People usually brush it off when I act like that, I usually apologize when I go back and reread my posts. My bad buddy.

Originally posted by carver9
I just woke up and I was talking crazy. I think I fussed at a good buddy of mine on here after I said that to you. People usually brush it off when I act like that, I usually apologize when I go back and reread my posts. My bad buddy.

😕

You go from ignoring me to calling me buddy? Did I walk through a dimensional portal on my way back to the computer?

Originally posted by Delta1938

AHHHHH "cherry pick." The Go-To response when someone doesn't have much of an argument to counter feats.

Doesn't matter if Thor has or hasn't had his jaw broken, you're making a stupid argument, plain and simple. What feats make you think Thor's close to Superman in durability?

Thor has survived attacks from Galactus, Mangog, Odin, and Celestials. If you want to go high end only you won't like how this plays out. I get a kick out of fanatical Superman fans though.

Thor has some of the best durability fts out of everyone in his tier imo.

Originally posted by carver9
Thor has some of the best durability fts out of everyone in his tier imo.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Delta seems rather focused on the word nuke. It's just nukes and tear gas for some people.

😂 I want to see how this durability debate turns out. Keep it going.

Originally posted by carver9
I just woke up and I was talking crazy. I think I fussed at a good buddy of mine on here after I said that to you. People usually brush it off when I act like that, I usually apologize when I go back and reread my posts. My bad buddy.

Originally posted by Delta1938
😕

You go from ignoring me to calling me buddy? Did I walk through a dimensional portal on my way back to the computer?

😂 😂 I think the proper response would be.

"Who are you and what have you done with carver9's account?"

😄 No offense ment to carver9 by the way.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You cherry picked examples. You use some bs feats and ignore the rest. Their durability is very comparable.

Thor has survived attacks from Galactus, Mangog, Odin, and Celestials. If you want to go high end only you won't like how this plays out. I get a kick out of fanatical Superman fans though.

That's nice. Superman has a longer, more impressive list. Still saying I "cherry pick" examples. heh Funny, Quan.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Delta seems rather focused on the word nuke. It's just nukes and tear gas for some people.

Now what exactly are you trying to say here?

Originally posted by Delta1938
That's nice. Superman has a longer, more impressive list. Still saying I "cherry pick" examples. heh Funny, Quan.

Now what exactly are you trying to say here?

That a "nuke" or "tear gas" is a plot device outside of specific powersets involved in these matchups. Just because a Tony Stark satellite takes out Worldbreaker Hulk that doesn't mean Gladiator can take him out. It isn't comparable. Apples to oranges, sport.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, he doesn't. These two are pretty comparable when it comes to durability. I'd say superman is slightly more durable but you are acting like they aren't even on the same page.

Yes, he does have a longer and more impressive list.

Originally posted by quanchi112
That a "nuke" or "tear gas" is a plot device outside of specific powersets involved in these matchups. Just because a Tony Stark satellite takes out Worldbreaker Hulk that doesn't mean Gladiator can take him out. It isn't comparable. Apples to oranges, sport.

I can see the argument for nukes, but since when was tear gas a plot device?

Originally posted by Delta1938
Yes, he does have a longer and more impressive list.

I can see the argument for nukes, but since when was tear gas a plot device?

All weapons outside normal tech usually falls under the plot device type of argument.

Thor and Superman have comparable durability and damage soak feats.

How or why that's being debated is beyond me.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Thor and Superman have comparable durability and damage soak feats.

How or why that's being debated is beyond me.

Superman's durability is proven and well-known, Thor's are relatively less so. It's no surprise if people want verification on that IMO (respect thread always a good start though).

Originally posted by Placidity
Superman's durability is proven and well-known, Thor's are relatively less so. It's no surprise if people want verification on that IMO (respect thread always a good start though).

Ignorance of feats or knowledge of a character is not really an excuse when a respect thread is readily available.

For the record, yeah, I'd argue that Superman is generally portrayed as being more "invincible" than Thor is, but really, you'd have to have a glaring lack of knowledge on both characters if you don't think they're even comparable to begin with.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Thor and Superman have comparable durability and damage soak feats.

How or why that's being debated is beyond me.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Ignorance of feats or knowledge of a character is not really an excuse when a respect thread is readily available.

For the record, yeah, I'd argue that Superman is generally portrayed as being more "invincible" than Thor is, but really, you'd have to have a glaring lack of knowledge on both characters if you don't think they're even comparable to begin with.

I dunno brother, you have some peeps around here claiming that Thor is more comparable to Wonder Woman in strength than to Superman 😱

Originally posted by dmills
I dunno brother, you have some peeps around here claiming that Thor is more comparable to Wonder Woman in strength than to Superman 😱

Lol...exactly and that's sad.