Originally posted by MairuzuThis convo is inefficient (toward whats being discussed) haermm
So sure it can be. Its not very productive and wasting time for a decent conversation to take place. Sorry you couldn't get a full laugh out of it though, lol.
Opinions will be opinions.
Why not just admit that you used a word you didn't (and still don't apparently) understand?
Originally posted by inimalist
insignificant to the results of the GOP primaries or the federal election
...so the media stops spamming him with questions about the racial news letters since hes not significant according to delegate polls they put out while only half way through the race?
How strange.
Especially how he is favored over Obama, more so than Romney.
By the way, what do you guys read or listen to, to gather your opinions? Just curious.
Originally posted by Mairuzu
Yes, I did read what you said and no where in there did you state what you'd like to do about it therefore I asked, do you just give up?Do you think picking up a gun and fighting the government would solve the problems we're facing?
Except the part where I said I vote Independent, as I'd like a competitive 3rd party for no other reason as to make the other two hold to the promises they make. So that the "do" of what I do.
Nope.
What do you do?
I do a shit ton of research on a daily basis and I hand out information for people who simply don't know a whole lot about what goes on in government or outside their box. Most people don't even realize the federal reserve a privately owned central bank.
@ DDM. Another good point. I think this whole movement has enspired a lot of people to do exactly that. Its part of the "revolution" it seems. Paul is simply trying to change the country and to wake many from their intellectual slumber.
Originally posted by Mairuzu
...so the media stops spamming him with questions about the racial news letters since hes not significant according to delegate polls they put out while only half way through the race?How strange.
he was never going to win, so it really didn't matter for the media to vet him in any way. Its why the newsletters didn't come up in 2008.
You do realize that more media coverage correlates to poorer results for Paul, yes? Most Americans don't actually believe in his radical ideas. When he can shout, Freedom, Change and Constitution to a bunch of people who don't question him, he does fairly well. When media outlets start challenging him, he loses ground.
Originally posted by Mairuzu
Especially how he is favored over Obama, more so than Romney.
? wut?
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_paul_vs_obama-1750.html
you mean in a single pole he had a lead that amounted to 2%, which seems to reflect poorer numbers from Obama (down to 41 from an average of 47) than good ones for Paul (up to 43 from an average of 39)?
also, Romney polls much better than Paul against Obama
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html
Originally posted by Mairuzu
http://www.2012presidentialelectionnews.com/2012-republican-primary-schedule/
Michigan
Paul - 8.4%
Illinois
Paul - 9.3%
Missouri
Paul - 12%
Idaho
Paul - 18.1%
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/03/maryland-primary-2012-results-map_n_1401264.html
Wisconsin
Paul - 11.2%
Maryland
Paul - 9.5%
cool pictures though, almost made a good point until you look at data