Morgan Freeman: "I'm marrying my step-grandduaghter, b!tches!"

Originally posted by focus4chumps
well, his original implication was brushed over:

ddm has a way of making a short and valid point and then typing a brain-dropping to punctuate it.

Now now, don't try and libel me. You can do better than that.

You are definitely doing one of those strawman things again. Context is key. I do believe I had discussed a very specific reason for why I put the amendment at the end of my post. I had stated this before stating what you quoted:

Originally posted by dadudemon
One amendment: if you are not sexually developed at 17 (you look like you're 12 or something....which does happen), then being sexually attracted to that 17 year old would be pedophilia. Justifying it not being pedophilia just because of a number does not fly psychologically.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
we would likely still be on page 4. instead he goes on to suggest that she was likely not prepubescent at 17 because she's black. considering the average age for the onset of puberty for girls is 9-10 years old....well...yeeeeah.

Nah. It is decreasing the likelyhood that someone could use my own words against me: "But didn't you just say that some girls have not hit puberty (menarche) by 17?" Yes, I did say that, but it is even less likely since she is African American.

I am very glad you went down this path, Chumps. 😄

Originally posted by focus4chumps

Wow. It's like you're stuck in the 80s being the archetypal highschool bully. 😐

Originally posted by dadudemon
Now now, don't try and libel me. You can do better than that.

i think you misspelled "quote".

Originally posted by dadudemon
You are definitely doing one of those strawman things again. Context is key. I do believe I had discussed a very specific reason for why I put the amendment at the end of my post. I had stated this before stating what you quoted:

you keep saying "strawman" but its clear that you dont know what it means.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Nah. It is decreasing the likelyhood that someone could use my own words against me: "But didn't you just say that some girls have not hit puberty (menarche) by 17?" Yes, I did say that, but it is even less likely since she is African American.

see, you could have simply claimed that you meant to simply type "puberty", minus the "pre". the admittance of a believable simple and easily made error, saving face. but no.

so now you want to sell the idea that you were referring to the possibility of having the abnormality of delayed puberty is more frequent among white girls. fine then. i guess you have more homework to do 😂 TO GOOGLE!!!

Originally posted by focus4chumps
i think you misspelled "quote".

you keep saying "strawman" but its clear that you dont know what it means.

No, I definitely know what it means. You misrepresented my argument and then argued against that misrepresentation. I don't think you know what logic is.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
see, you could have simply claimed that you meant to simply type "puberty", minus the "pre". the admittance of a believable simple and easily made error, saving face. but no.

Uh, no. That would not make sense.

Let me check to see if what you're saying is clear:

"Keep in mind, wakkawakkawakka, that pedophilia is a primary attraction to [puberty] humans. This lady was probably not [puberty] at 17. Considering she was black, most likely, she sexually matured ahead of most American females."

Nope, that doesn't make sense.

Well, you tried.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
so now you want to sell the idea that you were referring to the possibility of having the abnormality of delayed puberty is more frequent among white girls. fine then. i guess you have more homework to do 😂 TO GOOGLE!!!

No. I did not claim that at all. You are are doing another strawman.

This is what I said:

"Nah. It is decreasing the likelyhood that someone could use my own words against me: "But didn't you just say that some girls have not hit puberty (menarche) by 17?" Yes, I did say that, but it is even less likely since she is African American."

Why? Because we know African Americans hit puberty earlier, on average. Why is that important?

Oh, because her not having hit puberty (menarche) by 17 "is even less likely since she is African American."

At this point, I think I can start requotting myself.

Get a room, you two...

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Get a room, you two...

We did. We need more lube. pained

Originally posted by dadudemon
We did. We need more lube. pained

😱 😮 I don't want to know...

Originally posted by dadudemon
No, I definitely know what it means. You misrepresented my argument and then argued against that misrepresentation. I don't think you know what logic is.

Uh, no. That would not make sense.

Let me check to see if what you're saying is clear:

"Keep in mind, wakkawakkawakka, that pedophilia is a primary attraction to [puberty] humans. This lady was probably not [puberty] at 17. Considering she was black, most likely, she sexually matured ahead of most American females."

Nope, that doesn't make sense.

Well, you tried.

No. I did not claim that at all. You are are doing another strawman.

This is what I said:

"Nah. It is decreasing the likelyhood that someone could use my own words against me: "But didn't you just say that some girls have not hit puberty (menarche) by 17?" Yes, I did say that, but it is even less likely since she is African American."

Why? Because we know African Americans hit puberty earlier, on average. Why is that important?

Oh, because her not having hit puberty (menarche) by 17 "is even less likely since she is African American."

At this point, I think I can start requotting myself.

first off, "menarche" means the 'first menstrual cycle'. it is not a synonym to 'puberty' but a product of it, which usually occurs long after the onset of puberty. look it up, and next time use a dictionary before trying to impress me with big words.

anyway, your argument is a non sequitur.
you concluded that the occurrences of 'delayed puberty' (an exclusive condition, with many exclusive causes) is directly correlated to the general averages of puberty age by race.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
😱 😮 I don't want to know...

The lube's cos the anal cavity isn't good at self-lubricating in terms for sexual use.

Originally posted by Robtard
The lube's cos the anal cavity isn't good at self-lubricating in terms for sexual use.

The fact you know this is disturbing.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
first off, "menarche" means the 'first menstrual cycle'. it is not a synonym to 'puberty' but a product of it, which usually occurs long after the onset of puberty. look it up, and next time use a dictionary before trying to impress me with big words.

First off, I put menarche in the parenthesis to indicate at which portion of puberty I actually meant. That is your first interpretive mistake.

Secondly, I could use thelarche if I wanted to indicate tanner stage II as the point of when puberty starts. Since I was quite specific with menarche in parenthesis (that was for the benefit of those that wanted to be pedantic), I obviously did not mean tanner stage II because menarche can occur throughout the tanner stages (almost always on or after tanner stage II).

It is only due to your ignorance that you went down this path. In fact, everything you typed up is irrelevant to the point I actually made.

Like I said, you'll try and find something wrong with what I post because you hate it so much that you cannot get me with something.

Deal with it, Chumps: I am better than you. It happens. There are many people better than me. It's an uphill battle to try and be better than someone because there is always a bigger fish. Get over yourself: there's plenty of things to focus on that are more fulfilling. 😉

Originally posted by focus4chumps
anyway, your argument is a non sequitur.
you concluded that the occurrences of 'delayed puberty' (an exclusive condition, with many exclusive causes) is directly correlated to the general averages of puberty age by race.

No. I did not claim that at all. You are are doing another strawman.

This is what I said:

"Nah. It is decreasing the likelyhood that someone could use my own words against me: "But didn't you just say that some girls have not hit puberty (menarche) by 17?" Yes, I did say that, but it is even less likely since she is African American."

Why? Because we know African Americans hit puberty earlier, on average. Why is that important?

Oh, because her not having hit puberty (menarche) by 17 "is even less likely since she is African American."

One thing I always wondered...if I capitalize all of "inimalist" like this "INIMALIST" is that acceptable spelling...

Alternatively, what about "iNIMALIST"?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
The fact you know this is disturbing.

Originally posted by NemeBro
I was under the impression that was common knowledge.

Eww, you sick pervert.

Originally posted by NemeBro
I was under the impression that was common knowledge.

Shaky's just being coy and trying to pretend like he's never ****ed another person in the ass.

Originally posted by NemeBro
I was under the impression that was common knowledge.

Not really, but that was not what I was responding too.

Anything Robtard knows is disturbing, don't you think? 😄

Originally posted by Robtard
Shaky's just being coy and trying to pretend like he's never ****ed another person in the ass.

Interestingly enough, I have never found a woman who was into that. Maybe it is a generational thing.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Interestingly enough, I have never found a woman who was into that. Maybe it is a generational thing.

Baby-boomer women are into it as much as say now. It's all in the angle of approach.

Or you could try the Morgan Freeman tactic.

Originally posted by Robtard
Baby-boomer women are into it as much as say now. It's all in the angle of approach.

Or you could try the Morgan Freeman tactic.

😆 I would not be interested in a younger woman. Beyond the basic human nature, you do have to talk to them afterword. 😉

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
😆 I would not be interested in a younger woman. Beyond the basic human nature, you do have to talk to them afterword. 😉

Find an agnostic hipster that just graduated from Highschool. 😐

They are usually much smarter and they can philosophize with the best of them.

One more of these ---> 😐

plus Shaky, they'll spread cheek for you.