Anti-montior vs Galactus

Started by quanchi1125 pages

Originally posted by Galan007
AM destroyed all but 3 of an infinite amount of universes (sounds dumb, I know, but that's comics for ya.) He then absorbed all of that power into his being, and used it to travel to the dawn of time where he ultimately beat an amped Corrigan-Spectre... And lol @ him "needing tech" to destroy universes. 🙄

Anyway, AM stomps Galactus.

The amped Spectre did not want to prevail otherwise the heroes would have died as well. Context.

No, he doesn't.

Originally posted by Utrigita
Not that it matters COIE AM still stomps Galactus.

👆

Originally posted by Prep-Man
👆
Based on ?

Based on consuming a infinite number of universes, which is an infinite number of universes more than Galactus has ever even stepped foot in.

Originally posted by Cogito
Based on consuming a infinite number of universes, which is an infinite number of universes more than Galactus has ever even stepped foot in.
That didn't prove jack against Supergirl now did it ? LOL at your reasoning. Maybe he should have explained what he did so she could properly take a dive.

Originally posted by Cogito
Based on consuming a infinite number of universes, which is an infinite number of universes more than Galactus has ever even stepped foot in.

You're arguing with someone who thinks Odin could beat the AM. Why are you wasting your time?

You know I hate to say this but I've gotta agree with Quanchi. Almost every showing in Crisis on Infinite Earth's was achieved with a tremendous amount of Prep. So if this were Anti-Monitor with PREP, he'd swamp Galactus.

As it stands, Galactus has better on panel instantaneous feats than AM.

Galactus wins.

No.

Originally posted by Galan007
No.

Originally posted by Galan007
No.
You're wrong and won't even face me anymore. You just steal my avies nowadays.

Originally posted by Blight
😂

Originally posted by Blight
😂

Originally posted by PillarofOsiris
You're arguing with someone who thinks Odin could beat the AM. Why are you wasting your time?

Tonight I have particularly little to do 😮

Originally posted by quanchi112
That didn't prove jack against Supergirl now did it ?

lol?
1. That was not AM at his best
2. He was fine
3. He killed Supergirl
4. Galactus has never been attacked or hurt by weaker beings? In fact, nobody has ever been attacked or hurt by weaker beings? Come on now, Quan. 😬

Originally posted by Blight
You know I hate to say this but I've gotta agree with Quanchi. Almost every showing in Crisis on Infinite Earth's was achieved with a tremendous amount of Prep. So if this were Anti-Monitor with PREP, he'd swamp Galactus.

As it stands, Galactus has better on panel instantaneous feats than AM.

Galactus wins.

See
Originally posted by ozz81
AM at best vs

Originally posted by Cogito
Tonight I have particularly little to do 😮

lol?
1. That was not AM at his best
2. He was fine
3. He killed Supergirl
4. Galactus has never been attacked or hurt by weaker beings? In fact, nobody has ever been attacked or hurt by weaker beings? Come on now, Quan. 😬

See

1.That was after he destroyed the universes so thus relevant to your point.

2.If you count his shell being wrecked as completely fine. I don't.

3.As he should have. I should leaf through the issue because I know it wasn't easy. I might later on.

4.Galactus while weakened has. Anti Monitor wasn't weakened. I am not citing kal-L's death of him as proof. I am consistent.

What is Anti Monitor's most impressive combat feat ?

Originally posted by Cogito
See

I think that's a bit of being up to interpretation.

Superman "At His Best" doesn't start as Superman One Million, does he?

I could be wrong on this, though.

Frankly I feel the OP should clarify if this means AM with Prep or not.

Originally posted by Blight
I think that's a bit of being up to interpretation.

Superman "At His Best" doesn't start as Superman One Million, does he?

I could be wrong on this, though.

Frankly I feel the OP should clarify if this means AM with Prep or not.

You don't feel there's a difference between using a character at the peak of his power within his introductory event and cherry picking a couple spot appearances of a character with nearly ten thousand appearances?

Besides, if someone said "Superman at his best", we can and would use CA Superman. if someone said "Thor at his best", we'd use RKT, etc.

Originally posted by Cogito
You don't feel there's a difference between using a character at the peak of his power within his introductory event and cherry picking a couple spot appearances of a character with nearly ten thousand appearances?

Besides, if someone said "Superman at his best", we can and would use CA Superman. if someone said "Thor at his best", we'd use RKT, etc.

Superman at his best means at his highest showings ie. most capable not most powerful amp. I can't believe I have to explain this to you. Oh wait yes I can.

Originally posted by Cogito
You don't feel there's a difference between using a character at the peak of his power within his introductory event and cherry picking a couple spot appearances of a character with nearly ten thousand appearances?

Besides, if someone said "Superman at his best", we can and would use CA Superman. if someone said "Thor at his best", we'd use RKT, etc.

But that wasn't power he had on his own, was it?

What is CA Superman? These abbreviations can give me a headache. I assumed "At Best" Meant under their own power, not influenced by outside forces.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Superman at his best means at his highest showings ie. most capable not most powerful amp. I can't believe I have to explain this to you. Oh wait yes I can.

I can't believe in 2 minutes I found over a half dozen examples of this exact thing

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f77/t564145.html
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f77/t455188.html
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f77/t563875.html
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=561936
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=561848
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=561685
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=561707
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=561697

Give me ten minutes and I can find a few dozen more examples

Originally posted by Blight
But that wasn't power he had on his own, was it?

What is CA Superman? These abbreviations can give me a headache. I assumed "At Best" Meant under their own power, not influenced by outside forces.


CA Superman is Cosmic Armor Superman from Superman Beyond (Final Crisis).

See above for examples of threads using "at their best" meaning amped (usually by outside forces)

Originally posted by Cogito
I can't believe in 2 minutes I found over a half dozen examples of this exact thing

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f77/t564145.html
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f77/t455188.html
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f77/t563875.html
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=561936
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=561848
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=561685
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=561707
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=561697

Give me ten minutes and I can find a few dozen more examples

CA Superman is Cosmic Armor Superman from Superman Beyond (Final Crisis).

See above for examples of threads using "at their best" meaning amped (usually by outside forces)

I clicked on your first example. it clearly separates Thor in three separate versions. That shows amps do matter. Do you even understand the links ? I mean the first one disproves your case. I won't click on another one since you can't comprehend simple words.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f77/t564145.html

1.Current or classic Thor
2.KT
3.RKT

Who wins in each of the above and why?

Majestic at his best means unaided with his own personal best standard tech. Odin at his best doesn't mean amped in the Destroyer unless otherwise stated.