Originally posted by quanchi112
You exaggerated his feats
Name the exagerrated feats/
and want to completely dismiss how he's portrayed when he goes up against a foe.
He doesn't have many fights in the movies, but since apparently every Superman movie is being allowed, his fight with Nuclear Man was circling the planet and had shit like cutting mountains in half with heat vision.
Superman's top speed feats are impressive but he doesn't do so in combat.
See above.
Thor's hammer will hurt a lot more so than a giant coca cola sign or a manhole.
Superman's fist will hurt a lot more than a helicopter blade. You know, the thing that went through Hulk's chest like butter.
Thor or Hulk win. Just too much. Superman's very unskilled with his powers and lacks dynamic strength like the Hulk.
The ability to exert muscular force repeatedly or over a period of time.
That is the definition of dynamic strength.
Superman was able to continually push a small country out of orbit over a period of a few minutes, despite being injured and weakened.
Please shut the **** up quan, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about.
Thor's more skilled while the Hulk is stronger.
Thor being more skilled doesn't mean a goddamn thing when Superman is millions of times more powerful. Your Mike Tyson vs. Jay Cutler is idiotic. You could make it Mike Tyson vs. an elephant, and the incredible difference in strength and power between those two still isn't as great as the difference between Thor and Superman, or Superman and Hulk.
Why is Hulk stronger than Superman? The feats sure as hell don't point to it.