Avengers movie Durability rate

Started by Newjak6 pages

Originally posted by Starscream M
if you said thats how you remembered it, thats one thing. saying you feel it seems wrong to me...its too wishy washy.

if you remembered thor giving hulk a bloody nose, then fine, I'll go rewatch and see if I can confirm

Except that is what I said the first time around.

Originally posted by Newjak

And maybe I'm remembering it wrong but I swear Thor gave Hulk a bloody nose when he bashed him into the plane.

Originally posted by Mindset
No they don't.

Superman 1, for instance.

Wonderful. Go back to the 70s.

Like I said, as a general rule.

Originally posted by CosmicComet
Wonderful. Go back to the 70s.

Like I said, as a general rule.

How does it matter if it happened in the 70's?

As a general rule? You mentioned one movie, I countered. You lost.

Well atleast Thor was the only warrior that can hang with Hulk mano to mano. Their blows were even on one another. They both drive each other through walls, planes etc and still ready for more.

Originally posted by Mindset
How does it matter if it happened in the 70's?

As a general rule? You mentioned one movie, I countered. You lost.

I constantly overestimate your ability to comprehend the obvious. I need to stop doing that. The 70s. People were less knowledgeable all around. No internet for quick references after all. Hell, that goes for Silver Age comics versus Modern as well. Writers are more knowledgeable and attempt to portray that in their stories.

Hence the difference between Superman 1 and, you know, Returns.

Yes, as a general rule. Which is redundant, because that's what 'as a rule' means in the first place. I was just trying to dumb it down for you.

Originally posted by CosmicComet
I constantly overestimate your ability to comprehend the obvious. I need to stop doing that. The 70s. People were less knowledgeable all around. No internet for quick references after all. Hell, that goes for Silver Age comics versus Modern as well. Writers are more knowledgeable and attempt to portray that in their stories.

Hence the difference between Superman 1 and, you know, Returns.

Yes, as a general rule. Which is redundant, because that's what 'as a rule' means in the first place. I was just trying to dumb it down for you.

Lol, so in the 70's people thought that someone flying around the Earth at lightspeed and turning back time was completely logical?

You're a dunce.

Comics now make about as much sense as Silver Age, now they just skew physics to make them seem "realistic".

Originally posted by Mindset
Lol, so in the 70's people thought that someone flying around the Earth at lightspeed and turning back time was completely logical?

You're a dunce.

Comics now make about as much sense as Silver Age, now they just skew physics to make them seem "realistic".

Maybe, maybe not. Don't know the writer personally. I was referring to the feats in general, Superman could save a falling plane a lot easier as Christoper Reeves than he could as Routh, even if they are the same character in continuity.

Why? Greater attention to physics.

As always Mindset, you are always a step behind. But you're funny, so you're excusable.

And exactly, attempts, as I said.

Now, tell me what you think of Thor hitting the ground? That's the only thing I care about out of this tangent.

Originally posted by CosmicComet
Maybe, maybe not. Don't know the writer personally. I was referring to the feats in general, Superman could save a falling plane a lot easier as Christoper Reeves than he could as Routh, even if they are the same character in continuity.

Why? Greater attention to physics.

As always Mindset, you are always a step behind. But you're funny, so you're excusable.

And exactly, attempts, as I said.

Now, tell me what you think of Thor hitting the ground? That's the only thing I care about out of this tangent.

You don't know much. Superman had trouble saving a falling plane. Superman then lifting a island sized piece of rock and tossed it into space without it completely breaking apart. SO realistic, I'm glad we live in an age where comic movies adhere to physics.

You have nothing but mediocre insults because you're wrong.

Originally posted by Mindset
You don't know much. Superman had trouble saving a falling plane. Superman then lifting a island sized piece of rock and tossed it into space without it completely breaking apart. SO realistic, I'm glad we live in an age where comic movies adhere to physics.

You have nothing but mediocre insults because you're wrong.

To be fair the Island was made of K-Nite so it may have been able to not break apart while if you watch the the little rock shield Superman used was breaking apart.

So it could have been more realistic then you're giving it credit for.

Hulk > Thor/Loki > Iron Man

Thor is obviously more powerful of the two but Loki actually had some pretty good durability feats and didn't look particularly less durable than Thor.

Originally posted by Mindset
You don't know much. Superman had trouble saving a falling plane. Superman then lifting a island sized piece of rock and tossed it into space without it completely breaking apart. SO realistic, I'm glad we live in an age where comic movies adhere to physics.

You have nothing but mediocre insults because you're wrong.

Poor Mindset, always fails to see the bigger, general picture of a statement so tries to retort with holes that were obvious to anyone in the first place. I blame this stemming off the fact that you probably didn't know what 'as a rule' meant. The rock was breaking apart, actually, so still more realistic than similar things he did in Superman 1, like move tectonic plates.

My insults always seem to rile you up, since you're always wrong whenever you've attempted to address me. 🙂

I ask again, what, do you think of Thor hitting the ground? That is the only thing I wish to know.

Originally posted by Newjak
To be fair the Island was made of K-Nite so it may have been able to not break apart while if you watch the the little rock shield Superman used was breaking apart.

So it could have been more realistic then you're giving it credit for.

K-nite never showed any kind of super durability. In fact, iirc, it broke like regular rocks.

Superman needed to reach escape velocity in order to get it out of Earth's orbit.

Originally posted by Mindset
K-nite never showed any kind of super durability. In fact, iirc, it broke like regular rocks.

Superman needed to reach escape velocity in order to get it out of Earth's orbit.

Excuse me it was crystal mixed/given K-Nite properties. That is what I meant.

So it may have been more durable than normal rock.

Originally posted by Mindset
Lol, so in the 70's people thought that someone flying around the Earth at lightspeed and turning back time was completely logical?

You're a dunce.

Comics now make about as much sense as Silver Age, now they just skew physics to make them seem "realistic".


Yeah, silver surfer has also travelled through time via FTL travel around earth in the same era.

Originally posted by CosmicComet
Poor Mindset, always fails to see the bigger, general picture of a statement so tries to retort with holes that were obvious to anyone in the first place. I blame this stemming off the fact that you probably didn't know what 'as a rule' meant. The rock was breaking apart, actually, so still more realistic than similar things he did in Superman 1, like move tectonic plates.

My insults always seem to riled you up, since you're always wrong whenever you've attempted to address me. 🙂

I ask again, what, do you think of Thor hitting the ground? That is the only thing I wish to know.

The rock was barely breaking apart, it was still the size of an island when he pushed it out of orbit. As a general rule it would have to, you know, be a general rule, i.e. show that for the majority of instances the laws of physics are adhered to...which is obviously not the case. For example, as a general rule, it's best not to listen to you because you don't know what you're talking about.

If you want to think I'm rile up that's ok, you're still wrong.

He hit the ground at a slower speed than Hulk did.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Seeing as Thor was crushing Iron-man's armor with his bare hands and dented it with a headbutt, I'd agree.

Exactly what I was thinking!

Originally posted by Newjak
Excuse me it was crystal mixed/given K-Nite properties. That is what I meant.

So it may have been more durable than normal rock.

And it was breaking like regular rock.

Look at the fight scene when they were kicking Supes ass.

Originally posted by Mindset
And it was breaking like regular rock.

Look at the fight scene when they were kicking Supes ass.

You mean where he hit a few skinny pieces?

Do you think if Superman lifted the Fortress of Solitude into the air it would be weak enough to break apart in the way you are describing?

Thor is more badly wounded when Loki stabs him than after his fight with Hulk.

Originally posted by The Sorrow
Hulk > Thor/Loki > Iron Man

Thor is obviously more powerful of the two but Loki actually had some pretty good durability feats and didn't look particularly less durable than Thor.

Originally posted by Newjak
You mean where he hit a few skinny pieces?

Do you think if Superman lifted the Fortress of Solitude into the air it would be weak enough to break apart in the way you are describing?


We see it breaking like regular rock, we don't see it being super strong.

What do you want me to say?