Originally posted by hunbu04I mean why not ? Spectre only survived against a weakened Shazam due to magical absorption. Shazam really isn't the most powerful being out there and he was greatly weakened.
Quanchi think Thanos and Surter is greater than the Spectre!!!!!!!!
This is all I have to Say 😆 😆
Originally posted by iceman24567
DS
Quite easily I should say .
Originally posted by TheGodKiller
Based on the comic , I have derived a mathematical equation for the power gained from the soulfire formula :P = S X 10^(n-1) .
where , P = power of the formula ,
S = soul of a new god ,
n = number of new god souls in the formula .Since Darkseid absorbed hundreds of thousands of new god souls ,
therefore , n>=100000.Hence , Darkseid's power = 10^99999 times that of a new god soul . At minimum , that is .
1 followed by 99999 zeroes . That's an insanely massive number .
I don't see Surtur even lasting for a second in this fight in any way , shape or form .
Horrible spite in favor of Darkseid .
Originally posted by quanchi112
I mean why not ? Spectre only survived against a weakened Shazam due to magical absorption. Shazam really isn't the most powerful being out there and he was greatly weakened.
Weakened Shazam? ORLY? Based off of what? As Modru gave Shazam all his power back just before his fight with Spectre.
Originally posted by -K-M-That's why I said it was retconned. The guy is all over the map. There is no common sense when it comes to him.
No, we assumed he did but FC confirmed HE DID NOT.Yet did Darkseid appear at all in IC? No, so use common sense
Originally posted by -K-M-No, he didn't. You need to reread it again.
Weakened Shazam? ORLY? Based off of what? As Modru gave Shazam all his power back just before his fight with Spectre.
Originally posted by -K-M-Darkseid was killed on panel. Then we found out he didn't die right there. That's a retcon because in the issue he clearly was killed.
No it was a reveal, NOT a retcon. Huge difference. Retcon is changing something that happened years ago into something different. A reveal just a few issues later after the incident in question is not a retcon...it's a reveal.Actually he did, he even said so.
You misinterpreted his words. It happens.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Darkseid was killed on panel. Then we found out he didn't die right there. That's a retcon because in the issue he clearly was killed.You misinterpreted his words. It happens.
No that's a reveal, a retcon is something different. Hawkman was "killed" by his enemies being torn apart in an issue and everyone thought he died, but just a few issues later it revealed he didn't. So by your standards that is a retcon too?
Originally posted by -K-M-No, because he was clearly killed and Morrison retconned it. If another writer changes someone's work that's a retcon. If a Thanosi clone is killed by Thor it becomes a retcon after another writer changes it. If it's the same writer you'd have a point but since it isn't I'm right as rain.
No that's a reveal, a retcon is something different. Hawkman was "killed" by his enemies being torn apart in an issue and everyone thought he died, but just a few issues later it revealed he didn't. So by your standards that is a retcon too?