Originally posted by Silent MasterPrecisely! That is what I'm doing.
We base WBH's durability on his comic feats, just like we do for every comic character,
that said, based on feats OF Thor is more than powerful enough to beat WBH.What feats by OF Thor show him exerting a greater or power than what WBH tanked when colliding with Betty?
Originally posted by Silent Master
What was so impressive about his colliding with Betty?
WBH was subject to over 1 million times the force than what caused the damage since WBH and Betty did it WITHOUT TOUCHING anything. Also WBH was subject to over 1 million times the force of a single Savage Hulk.
Here's proof:
It would take AT LEAST 100 times Savage's Hulk strength to disintegrate one of his peers with a direct hit.
It would take at 10 times that amount to disintegrate about 10 peers of his.
It would take at least 1000 times the above to disintegrate them without touching them from a distance.
WBH tanked over 100x20x1000 or a million times that of Savage Hulk's strength.
Note: It was more than 10 peers that was disintegrated ALONG with a planet being destroyed. It takes more than 100 time Savage Hulk's strength to disintegrate a peer of his. It takes more than 1000x more force to do x amount of damage from more than a hundred yards away without touching the object you are trying to damage.
Originally posted by h1a8
Here's proof:
It would take AT LEAST 100 times Savage's Hulk strength to disintegrate one of his peers with a direct hit.
It would take at 10 times that amount to disintegrate about 10 peers of his.
It would take at least 1000 times the above to disintegrate them without touching them from a distance.
WBH tanked over 100x20x1000 or a million times that of Savage Hulk's strength.
Originally posted by pym-ftw
So does everyone think Thor can hit hulk with lightning strong enough to fell him, yet not kill everyone around hulk like the warriors three?
I mean the aoe explosion? Or does he kill his friends in this thread
Thor has fine control over his attacks if that's what you're asking.
Originally posted by Gecko4lif
No it would take the same amount of energy. 10 people arent 10 times more durable ass hat
Not ten times more durable but the energy is spread over a larger distance due to the higher number of people and thus there would be a greater amount of dissipation in the latter case.
i.e The minimum amount of energy needed to destroy 1 mindless ones is indeed less than the minimum amount needed to destroy 10.
Originally posted by h1a8
WBH was subject to over 1 million times the force than what caused the damage since WBH and Betty did it WITHOUT TOUCHING anything. Also WBH was subject to over 1 million times the force of a single Savage Hulk.Here's proof:
It would take AT LEAST 100 times Savage's Hulk strength to disintegrate one of his peers with a direct hit.It would take at 10 times that amount to disintegrate about 10 peers of his.
It would take at least 1000 times the above to disintegrate them without touching them from a distance.
WBH tanked over 100x20x1000 or a million times that of Savage Hulk's strength.
[b]Note
: It was more than 10 peers that was disintegrated ALONG with a planet being destroyed. It takes more than 100 time Savage Hulk's strength to disintegrate a peer of his. It takes more than 1000x more force to do x amount of damage from more than a hundred yards away without touching the object you are trying to damage. [/B]
To quote a certain poster "The problem with that is it ignores the existence of low showings and fluctuation of durability in comics.".
Originally posted by pym-ftw
kinda, but I mean has he ever used an attack with that kinda power with the avengers or a other team that close to an enemy?
He dropped a massive thunderbolt on Chaos King while fighting alongside Hercules and the other members of the God Squad.
Generally, given Thor's level of control over his attacks, he can manifest powerful blasts or storms without harming his allies if they're close.