Durability Gauntlet

Started by keiththegreat4 pages

Durability Gauntlet

Who gets farthest? Who stops soonest?

Contestants:

a) Superman, b) Silver Surfer, c) Thor, d) World War Hulk

Rules; No rest between rounds. Attacks are not ordered by level of power. Characters cannot use shields, but they can amp their durability, if they have been shown to be able to do so. There is one minute between rounds, so any healing factors can come into play.

If character is KO'ed, his unconscious body advances. The only way to stop, is by death.

Each character takes each attack exactly as the "hero" on each page. i.e., in 2nd round, they'd get hit by Sentry first, then the combined U-foes blast. Whatever is posted onpanel.

Gauntlet:

Galactus and Thanos behind Black Bolt...!?

How do you ration in The Hulk and his Super HF abilities when considering his durability?

Originally posted by Bouboumaster
Galactus and Thanos behind Black Bolt...!?

Re-read the OP

I think it will be better if you replace the hero in this feats and see who can do the same

Surviving the electromagnetic discharge of 50 supernovas

Surviving the fusion of two worlds

Surviving the destruction of the source wall unprotected or like Metron said "The end of the universe"

Superman was hit by the shockwaves of the 50 super nova...he didn't feel the initial attack.

What part of the planet was Superman on when the two planets collided?

He was right at the impact point

Originally posted by carver9
Superman was hit by the shockwaves of the 50 super nova...he didn't feel the initial attack.

What part of the planet was Superman on when the two planets collided?

Right between the two of them

Gotcha. Nice durability ft. Would you consider that a planetary ft.? I'm asking because half of the planet was intact.

LoL that didn't last long.

What didn't last long? The ft is an amazing ft...could possibly be planetary+. That's why I'm asking Bien.

Originally posted by carver9
What didn't last long? The ft is an amazing ft...could possibly be planetary+. That's why I'm asking Bien.

Those two planets are supposed to be galaxy size and the force required to fuse two objects together is supposed greater than just two planets colliding.

The mythbusters tried to fuse two 18 wheelers a la Matrix movie style, but the force required to fuse metal is greater than the force you can get from a simple head on collision. So they could not do it. the 18 wheelers were running at 60mph IIRC

Then IIRC they tried fusion at the speed of sound, ONE object traveling at the speed of sound vs a stationary object, needless to say the object moving at the speed of sound obliterated the stationary one.

In order for them to fuse metal together by collision they needed explosives. With explosives providing the pushing force behind the metal, they were able to achieve metal fusion

So to apparently to fuse two solid objects together you need more than just collision force.

Galaxy sized planets... not in DOTNG.

Either way, Galactus is the only one capable of killing anyone in this thread. That depends on how high you view Thanos though. Possibly Thanos could kill them too with that blast... but I'm not sure that would fly.

Actually the way it usually works is though stuff in the Fourth World might be bigger, anyone traveling there from the normal universe gets their size increased as well, so compared to Superman's size there they were still just planet-sized. Still it's multi-planet level+

Originally posted by Endless Mike
Actually the way it usually works is though stuff in the Fourth World might be bigger, anyone traveling there from the normal universe gets their size increased as well, so compared to Superman's size there they were still just planet-sized. Still it's multi-planet level+
Pretty much.

A city sized crater made a sizable flare up on the planet. They weren't galaxy sized in that series, or if we attribute the boom tube effect, they were, but it didn't matter in the least.

Was that from Soulfire DS?

This is the only mention of the size of apokolips in comparison to earth.

Unless bieb has something other than his lulzworthy "They weren't of that size in DONG", its safe to assume that it was way above than a mere planetery feat.

Originally posted by abhilegend
This is the only mention of the size of apokolips in comparison to earth.

Unless bieb has something other than his lulzworthy "They weren't of that size in DONG", its safe to assume that it was way above than a mere planetery feat.

Apokolips and New Gensis aren't always treated as Galactic sized, pretty sure travel has been made there without boom tubes in the past.

That being said, it's irrelevant if they were that large in DoNG, relative to Superman they were the size of regular planets like Earth.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Apokolips and New Gensis aren't always treated as Galactic sized, pretty sure travel has been made there without boom tubes in the past.

That being said, it's irrelevant if they were that large in DoNG, relative to Superman they were the size of regular planets like Earth.


Do you have anything other than your speculation about how large a planet is according to a writer? We have an actual comparison between earth and apokolips and unless you have a scan to contradict it, its just a laughably bad job at downplaying a feat. Just to remind you, the comparison was made while the heroes were ON apokolips via boom tube.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Do you have anything other than your speculation about how large a planet is according to a writer? We have an actual comparison between earth and apokolips and unless you have a scan to contradict it, its just a laughably bad job at downplaying a feat. Just to remind you, the comparison was made while the heroes were ON apokolips via boom tube.

I don't think you understand what I'm saying. When individuals travel to Apokolips/New Gensises via boom tubes they scale up, which is why to them they are relatively similar to Earth in size and the New Gods don't tower over them. That was why Bieb pointed out what he did.

It's an impressive feat, I don't understand why you have to make it out to be more than it is.