WBH vs Asgard

Originally posted by h1a8
Lies. Odin as a norm doesn't one shot high end heralds (especially casually).

The faultiness of your reasoning is that you assume WBH=Hulk and also you ignore or fail to see the magnitude of WBH's durability feats as being greater than the power damage Odin has ever shown. Meaning, you assume a false durability about WBH.

If we use collateral damage as proof of anything, it turns out absolutely dreadful for Hulk.

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
If you're basing Hulk surviving a planet destroying as greater than Odin can output... you must have missed Odin destroying galaxies, solar systems, and igniting suns.

If we use collateral damage as proof of anything, it turns out absolutely dreadful for Hulk.

Didn't you know, Odin's feats don't count.

Duh...

Originally posted by Silent Master
Didn't you know, Odin's feats don't count.

Duh...

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
If you're basing Hulk surviving a planet destroying as greater than Odin can output... you must have missed Odin destroying galaxies, solar systems, and igniting suns.

If we use collateral damage as proof of anything, it turns out absolutely dreadful for Hulk.

I guess you missed when I said,

"You have no understanding of it at all. You think WBH survived a simple planet destroying force. You have no clue at all. Think in terms of astronomically greater than a simple planet explosion of what WBH endured."

Also, my collateral damage reply was about the non existence of proof of a blast without using average showings.

Also Odin destroyed galaxies with many blasts and with help.
Galaxies are made of fluff when compared to the durability of WBH.
Meaning, destroying a mountain of fluff doesn't mean you can destroy an adamantium marble. Igniting suns is again a fluff feat combined with the understanding that all that is needed is a chain reaction to get it started.

Am I the only person who read hotm??

Originally posted by h1a8
I guess you missed when I said,

"You have no understanding of it at all. You think WBH survived a simple planet destroying force. You have no clue at all. Think in terms of astronomically greater than a simple planet explosion of what WBH endured."

Also, my collateral damage reply was about the non existence of proof of a blast without using average showings.

I guess you missed Odin having the feats needed to justify him soloing this fight.

Originally posted by h1a8

Galaxies are made of fluff when compared to the durability of WBH.

Originally posted by h1a8
I guess you missed when I said,

"You have no understanding of it at all. You think WBH survived a simple planet destroying force. You have no clue at all. Think in terms of astronomically greater than a simple planet explosion of what WBH endured."

Also, my collateral damage reply was about the non existence of proof of a blast without using average showings.

Also Odin destroyed galaxies with many blasts and with help.
Galaxies are made of fluff when compared to the durability of WBH.
Meaning, destroying a mountain of fluff doesn't mean you can destroy an adamantium marble. Igniting suns is again a fluff feat combined with the understanding that all that is needed is a chain reaction to get it started.

The second part is just goofball antics. So I'm not even going to bother.

Originally posted by h1a8
I guess you missed when I said,

"You have no understanding of it at all. You think WBH survived a simple planet destroying force. You have no clue at all. Think in terms of astronomically greater than a simple planet explosion of what WBH endured."

Also, my collateral damage reply was about the non existence of proof of a blast without using average showings.

Also Odin destroyed galaxies with many blasts and with help.
Galaxies are made of fluff when compared to the durability of WBH.
Meaning, destroying a mountain of fluff doesn't mean you can destroy an adamantium marble. Igniting suns is again a fluff feat combined with the understanding that all that is needed is a chain reaction to get it started.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You have no understanding or knowledge of Odin feats, that is the only thing that explains you thinking that WBH wins.

Originally posted by h1a8
I guess you missed when I said,

"You have no understanding of it at all. You think WBH survived a simple planet destroying force. You have no clue at all. Think in terms of astronomically greater than a simple planet explosion of what WBH endured."

Also, my collateral damage reply was about the non existence of proof of a blast without using average showings.

Also Odin destroyed galaxies with many blasts and with help.
Galaxies are made of fluff when compared to the durability of WBH.
Meaning, destroying a mountain of fluff doesn't mean you can destroy an adamantium marble. Igniting suns is again a fluff feat combined with the understanding that all that is needed is a chain reaction to get it started.

😐

And people wonder why I rarely visit the vs. forums anymore.

Originally posted by h1a8
Galaxies are made of fluff when compared to the durability of WBH.

And, it shall be funny every single time they do.

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
The powergem makes you resistant to some forms of attacks like telepathy, no?

It seems like I am the resident infinity Gem expert since I have the Infinity, Gauntlet, War, some crusade issues.. the Infinity Watch Series and side comics..

Thanos simply turned off the sensory input to the gems to limit himself. he did not exclusively use just the power gem. he prevented himself from using the gems in unison to give the heroes a small chance..

he still had mastery over the individual gems and its abilities from stopping time, creating life, transmutation and so on...

the power gem is suppose to contain the power of all that will be and has bn.

The Gem granting physical power or any other power is dependent on the user and how he views himself. If he doesnt think he can be harmed he wont be. Its why Drax could shrug off and not feel an attack when he thought about how strong he was compared to someone else or when caught day dreaming he could feel the attack.

Durability is a state of mind if u have the power gem. The way I see it if a bug had the strength to destroy a planet and Drax or Hulk didnt know what it could do it they would dismiss the attack with no harm and one shot it since they would subconsciously tap into the gem for the power needed to accomplish said task.

h1's jumped the shark big time.

Ban h1 for blatant trolling?

Originally posted by h1a8
I guess you missed when I said,

"You have no understanding of it at all. You think WBH survived a simple planet destroying force. You have no clue at all. Think in terms of astronomically greater than a simple planet explosion of what WBH endured."

Also, my collateral damage reply was about the non existence of proof of a blast without using average showings.

Also Odin destroyed galaxies with many blasts and with help.
Galaxies are made of fluff when compared to the durability of WBH.
Meaning, destroying a mountain of fluff doesn't mean you can destroy an adamantium marble. Igniting suns is again a fluff feat combined with the understanding that all that is needed is a chain reaction to get it started.

Compared to this, Carver actually makes sense.

Originally posted by iceman24567
Ban h1 for blatant trolling?

Originally posted by h1a8
How can comics disagree with me when they showed the magnitude of what WBH endured? You have no understanding of it at all. You think WBH survived a simple planet destroying force. You have no clue at all. Think in terms of astronomically greater than a simple planet explosion of what WBH endured.

In your opinion WBH could have survived anything in the comic and Odin still would be able to harm him directly.

I love this, right here, and what makes it even funnier is the following sentence:

You have no clue at all. Think in terms of astronomically greater than a simple planet explosion of what WBH endured.

Is he....is he actually arguing against himself? The choice of words suggests on a subconscious level, he is. ' Astronomical'...oh the irony.

Wbh did survive much more than a mere planetary explosion but as for the rest and Odin not being able to hurt him......meh it's h1

Originally posted by Naija boy
Wbh did survive much more than a mere planetary explosion but as for the rest and Odin not being able to hurt him......meh it's h1

Originally posted by Silent Master
I guess you missed Odin having the feats needed to justify him soloing this fight.

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
Explain then H1. Go on and explain what WBH survived, and why it's less than galaxy destroying force.

The second part is just goofball antics. So I'm not even going to bother.

First of all, Odin destroyed galaxies with help of another and with the aide of many many blasts, not a single one. So Odin being able to destroy a galaxy with a blast or anywhere close while at his highest is FALSE.

Second, what's more durable, the hot gasses that stars are made out of or something like adamantium? And apparently some high herald level beings can survive inside stars without harm. That means their durability is greater than the stars.

Third, it would take a lot of force to disintegrate a peer of Savage Hulk. And it would take more than a million times that to disintegrate a peer of Savage Hulk without even touching him through collision. And finally, it would take even much more than that to disintegrate COUNTLESS peers of Savage Hulk in the same manner.

Fourth, you guys are turning this into Odin at his highest vs. WBH when we all know that you guys use averages. So although Odin with help and using many blasts busting galaxies may or may not be enough to stop WBH, an average Odin (whose lesser) definitely won't.

Finally, if someone does collateral damage through a collision then the force of the collision is at least millions of time that of the force that did the damage. Thus it wasn't a simple planet explosion that WBH felt but astronomically more.
Think about it, if two sledge hammers collide at great force causing a small force to move some paper slightly then the force that the hammers collided with is MUCH greater than the force that move the paper.