Superman vs Hercules-Wrestling Match

Originally posted by keiththegreat
It took the Hulk like 3 or 4 punches to put Hercules down. Hulk couldn't even move Superman punching him over and over again.

Lol...that was WWH and that was PRECRISIS Superman that SAVAGE HULK fought and lol...Savage Hulk flash koed PRECRISIS Superman. Using non canon material (that didn't even help you) isn't the best route to go. WWH would do more than budge Superman with a punch, Savage Hulk as well.

Hercules doesnt have any showings that I can recall that doesn't back him up from being in Superman tier durability wise.

Been a while since I read WWhulk but wasn't Herc still up after those punches? I remember him getting messed up but not being put down?

Originally posted by carver9
Lol...that was WWH and that was PRECRISIS Superman that SAVAGE HULK fought and lol...Savage Hulk flash koed PRECRISIS Superman. Using non canon material (that didn't even help you) isn't the best route to go. WWH would do more than budge Superman with a punch, Savage Hulk as well.

Hercules doesnt have any showings that I can recall that doesn't back him up from being in Superman tier durability wise.

😆

You're hilarious.

Originally posted by jalek moye
Been a while since I read WWhulk but wasn't Herc still up after those punches? I remember him getting messed up but not being put down?

He was on the ground. But he wasn't really fighting back against the Hulk either. (he was but he was trying to talk him down too). But regardless of that example, Superman is far more durable than Hercules, anyone who doesn't realize that is ignorant of Superman, or just a Marvel fanboy.

Originally posted by keiththegreat
It took the Hulk like 3 or 4 punches to put Hercules down. Hulk couldn't even move Superman punching him over and over again.

Originally posted by PillarofOsiris
😆

You're hilarious.

Originally posted by PillarofOsiris
Superman is far more durable than Hercules, anyone who doesn't realize that is ignorant of Superman, or just a Marvel fanboy.

Not sure if you have heard the expression, but I feel it rings true here,

If everyone is wrong but you, your probably wrong

Dude, your like superman's quan just relax, it will be ok

He is right though.

No one can be any char's Quan. Not even Carver is Hulk's Quan.

Originally posted by pym-ftw
Not sure if you have heard the expression, but I feel it rings true here,

If everyone is wrong but you, your probably wrong

Dude, your like superman's quan just relax, it will be ok

Actually, it seems like most people agree with him.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Superman, decisively.

Originally posted by ColossusGrundy

Normal levels, Supes would beat him while talking to Bats about a strawberry pie recipe.

Originally posted by CosmicComet
Um.

Superman.

His wrestling skill might be no better than high school level, but his foot speed and mental speed is still a shit ton over Herc's.

Seeing as you only equalized strength and not speed.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
The instant Superman feels a choke coming on, he vibrates and goes intangible.

Then breaks Herc's limbs.

So really your comment makes no sense.

^About pure durability, please read context before making comments or you look dumb

I agree supes > Hercules in this match all my comments are about hercs supposed lack of durability

Originally posted by pym-ftw
^About pure durability, please read context before making comments or you look dumb

I agree supes > Hercules in this match all my comments are about hercs supposed lack of durability

You just keep failing:

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Durability clearly goes to Superman.

Durability is not even worth discussing. Superman > Hercules

Originally posted by pym-ftw
^About pure durability, please read context before making comments or you look dumb

I agree supes > Hercules in this match all my comments are about hercs supposed lack of durability

haha...so me saying that's Superman has a higher durability than Hercules makes me the Quan of Superman? Wow. Oh and it looks like I don't even have to bother addressing this:

"If everyone is wrong but you, your probably wrong"

as others have beaten me to the punch.

Originally posted by iceman24567
Damn you even fail like Pym bruv 😬

Originally posted by pym-ftw
^About pure durability, please read context before making comments or you look dumb

I agree supes > Hercules in this match all my comments are about hercs supposed lack of durability

Keith, where did I say Hercules > super in durability?

All I'm asking is why is Hercules durability being laughed off, minus energy absorbtion he's very similar to thor

We all agree Thor and supes are roughly equals with physical punishment going to supes, and with energy absorbing lending to thors better blast durability.

Please point out the "fail" so I may make corrections to how I view there Durability stacking up

Originally posted by pym-ftw

We all agree Thor and supes are roughly equals with physical punishment going to supes, and with energy absorbing lending to thors better blast durability.

I don't agree with this at all. And I know plenty of other reasonable people on this site who would disagree as well. As an example, Thor DIED from a nova (or would have anyway), while Superman, weakened survived a blast equivalent to 52 SUPERnovas. You can compare me to Quan all you want, but it would probably help your position more if you pointed out some actual examples that make you think Thor or Hercules are equal in durability to Superman rather than insulting people. (and I believe Thor has better durability than hercules as well).

Superman's physical durability is far beyond Thor's, although IMO Thor's shields (which he doesn't really use much anymore), energy projection, energy absorption and other abilities make him a rough equal to Superman in terms of overall POWER. But each will have advantages over the other.

Superman's main advantages over Thor are strength, speed and durability.

While Thor's main advantages over Superman are energy projection, energy absorption, and shields.

Originally posted by pym-ftw
Keith, where did I say Hercules > super in durability?

All I'm asking is why is Hercules durability being laughed off, minus energy absorbtion he's very similar to thor

We all agree Thor and supes are roughly equals with physical punishment going to supes, and with energy absorbing lending to thors better blast durability.

Please point out the "fail" so I may make corrections to how I view there Durability stacking up

Originally posted by pym-ftw

All I'm asking is why is Hercules durability being laughed off, minus energy absorbtion he's very similar to thor

I called him out because he said only a fanboy would compare durability, I asked why and I was attacked for it.

The quan remark was from multiple threads such as the remark that clarks infinite lifting feat was somehow greater than hercs

Or that superman is 4 times stronger than Thor

I am asking why even bother joining a vs website if you feel all opinions not shared by you are attacks, or "fanboy" antics

I never said I disagreed with supes winning this, I asked a reason for hercs durability low balling

I'm sorry if it offends you pillar, but imho you have a superman bias and to everyone else who felt the need to add there two cents to something not pertaining to them,

Mind your business!

Again if this offended you pillar I'm sorry, but you bashing of "marvel fanboys" offended me, so I request to end this argument between us for the good of this thread without bothering mods