Originally posted by keiththegreat
It took the Hulk like 3 or 4 punches to put Hercules down. Hulk couldn't even move Superman punching him over and over again.
That was SAVAGE Hulk fighting PC Superman
Pc superman>>>>>Normal Superman.
thats actually a high feat for hulk to even register to PC superman.
Huge difference.
Originally posted by pym-ftw
I called him out because he said only a fanboy would compare durability, I asked why and I was attacked for it.The quan remark was from multiple threads such as the remark that clarks infinite lifting feat was somehow greater than hercs
Or that superman is 4 times stronger than Thor
I am asking why even bother joining a vs website if you feel all opinions not shared by you are attacks, or "fanboy" antics
I never said I disagreed with supes winning this, I asked a reason for hercs durability low balling
I'm sorry if it offends you pillar, but imho you have a superman bias and to everyone else who felt the need to add there two cents to something not pertaining to them,
Mind your business!
Again if this offended you pillar I'm sorry, but you bashing of "marvel fanboys" offended me, so I request to end this argument between us for the good of this thread without bothering mods
Superman has multiple feats of lifting infinite weight, black holes, slowing eternity, altering reality with his punches, powering the Maggedon warhead, and other similar, albeit equally ridiculous, feats. Superman is generally as strong as he needs to be for virtually any situation. Pointing out one very ambiguous feat of Hercules over his lengthy career in comics, isn't really all that impressive. And I saw nothing that indicates Herc lifted INFINITE weight there either.
I wasn't offended by being compared to Quan, I've been called far worse on this site, but the difference between Quan and me is that while I'm a Superman fan, I don't think he's more than a high herald. I've said many times Thanos would beat Superman, for example, while many other Superman fans disagree. I believe that I put Superman where he belongs, as possibly the most powerful high herald in comics. While many people can rightly disagree with that statement, it's also not outlandish enough to be comparable to a guy who thinks Thanos is a skyfather.
So I said he 4x times as strong now eh? I believe I said 2x as strong, and that's being overly generous to Thor. I guess that's better than Carver claiming I said he was 1 million times stronger than Thor....though unsurprisingly he has yet to be able to find a quote of me saying that. Even the most diehard Thor fans I know would admit Superman has superior strength to Thor.
Originally posted by PillarofOsirisCaptain Marvel also lifted that infinit mass book. So is cap and black adam 2x thors strength being generous?
Superman has multiple feats of lifting infinite weight, black holes, slowing eternity, altering reality with his punches, powering the Maggedon warhead, and other similar, albeit equally ridiculous, feats. Superman is generally as strong as he needs to be for virtually any situation. Pointing out one very ambiguous feat of Hercules over his lengthy career in comics, isn't really all that impressive. And I saw nothing that indicates Herc lifted INFINITE weight there either.I wasn't offended by being compared to Quan, I've been called far worse on this site, but the difference between Quan and me is that while I'm a Superman fan, I don't think he's more than a high herald. I've said many times Thanos would beat Superman, for example, while many other Superman fans disagree. I believe that I put Superman where he belongs, as possibly the most powerful high herald in comics. While many people can rightly disagree with that statement, it's also not outlandish enough to be comparable to a guy who thinks Thanos is a skyfather.
So I said he 4x times as strong now eh? I believe I said 2x as strong, and that's being overly generous to Thor. I guess that's better than Carver claiming I said he was 1 million times stronger than Thor....though unsurprisingly he has yet to be able to find a quote of me saying that. Even the most diehard Thor fans I know would admit Superman has superior strength to Thor.
Originally posted by keiththegreat
It took the Hulk like 3 or 4 punches to put Hercules down. Hulk couldn't even move Superman punching him over and over again.
Its been awhile since i've read that disaster of a book too, but wasnt Hercules depowered at that time? I'm probably wrong. Nothing to do with the thread, just wondering.
Originally posted by ODG
Your confidence is charmingly humorous at best, flatly insulting at worst. And as he has nothing to do with this thread, your backhanded snipe at Thor is as unnecessary as it is transparent.
whats wrong with my post? i brought thor for no real reason however just wanted to show where i think hercules stands as far as the top heralds who are superman and thor.
Originally posted by tkitna
Its been awhile since i've read that disaster of a book too, but wasnt Hercules depowered at that time? I'm probably wrong. Nothing to do with the thread, just wondering.
No, he was at full power. He was barely fighting back though.
On topic, while I think Herc is a better wrestler, the OP didn't take away Superman's speed advantage. That ends Hercules.