Originally posted by red sabre
oh so now the feat is not good enough for your agenda? lame dude.
The feat is unquantifiable and would allow for contradictions. The mythology of the feat came from the ancient days where the Greeks thought Zeus was thee Omnipotent God of the universe. In marvel we know this is not the case and that Zeus is a much lower being. Also we know that Zeus doesn't have the power to collaspe a universe with a small portion of his power. That's ridiculous. Otherwise he would greater than all skyfathers along with all elder gods and Galactus himself, and that would contradict his showings and marvel hierarchy.
Originally posted by h1a8
The feat is unquantifiable and would allow for contradictions. The mythology of the feat came from the ancient days where the Greeks thought Zeus was thee Omnipotent God of the universe. In marvel we know this is not the case and that Zeus is a much lower being. Also we know that Zeus doesn't have the power to collaspe a universe with a small portion of his power. That's ridiculous. Otherwise he would greater than all skyfathers along with all elder gods and Galactus himself.
wtf are you mumbling about? hercules was supporting the heavens its a feat for him now get lost.
you were adressing high end feats of gladiator and hercules well i gave you hercules high end feat wtf is wrong then? GTFO
Originally posted by red sabre
prove gladiator can move them show me gladiator moving planets.
It took the two all day just to barely move the planet out of orbit. That means the acceleration was very low. Give the planet bashing version of Gladiator a whole day to move a planet. He would probably move it a great distance in that time.
Lastly, I don't even think the feat is canon. It wasn't part of the story. It was just a fun cereal box story that came after the story and was never referenced again.
Originally posted by h1a8
It took the two all day just to barely move the planet out of orbit. That means the acceleration was very low. Give the planet bashing version of Gladiator a whole day to move a planet. He would probably move it a great distance in that time.Lastly, I don't even think the feat is canon. It wasn't part of the story. It was just a fun cereal box story that came after the story and was never referenced again.
show me gladiator being able to move a planet, i say by his lifting and strength feats he cant do it prove me wrong, show me a feat of him moving a planet.
Originally posted by red sabre
wtf are you mumbling about? hercules was supporting the heavens its a feat for him now get lost.you were adressing high end feats of gladiator and hercules well i gave you hercules high end feat wtf is wrong then? GTFO
You are not using logic dude.
Either Supporting the heavens required a small of force
or the feat is unusable due to the PIS rule.
Zeus doesn't have universal power, especially considering it a small portion of his power that did it.
So choose. Otherwise Spider-man beating Firelord is a legit feat and you are allowed to use PIS as evidence.
Originally posted by h1a8
You are not using logic dude.
Either Supporting the heavens required a small of force
or the feat is unusable due to the PIS rule.
Zeus doesn't have universal power, especially considering it a small portion of his power that did it.So choose. Otherwise Spider-man beating Firelord is a legit feat and you are allowed to use PIS as evidence.
spider man beating firelord is PIS based on the fact he failed to beat weaker opponents during most of his career and based on how his powers were established thruought the years therefor firelord is out of his league.
hercules never failed to lift anything he supported a whole city, shook the earth while arm wrestling, and now held the heavens, nothing wrong with that because he is just that strong and never failed to lift anything in the first place.
i see what you are doing here, gladiator doesnt have any strength feats so you are nit picking the hercules feats, the good old tactic of bash the other feats but dont present your own, show me gladiator strength feats, what strength feats does he have? all i know is that he lifted a building abd busted with his fists a big rock which means its striking + strength feat.
Originally posted by The Sorrow
No your right, WWH nearly killing Hercules in 3 punches is much better!
WWH is a much stronger version of hulk than the one was beating on gladiator like a step child, hercules didnt even want to fight WWH and yet he did better by delivering the first blow and make WWH gush green blood, then he just stood there and took the hits, gladiator was fighting a weaker hulk and couldnt do antyhing to him just getting raped, and no hercules didnt almost die he was bruised but nothing special , considering the fact he was just standing and not fighting its amazing he didnt get knocked out in the first place.
hercules vs WWH + context >>>>>>>> gladiator getting owned by weaker hulk