Originally posted by h1a8Mjolnir is well above average Uru, thanks to the Odinpower/enchantments laced within it-- that much has been stated on panel, so we know it's fact.
The hammer doesn't have to show it is charged to prove extra durability. Thor's hammer is already more durable than normal Uru without showing it is charged. We know this by feats. Showing a charge can prove extra destructive force or power behind the throw, not necessarily extra durability.The scenes are comparable because of the damage done Period
What was not stated, shown or even alluded to, is Thor's hammer-strike being in any way 'amped' when it struck the shield. Therefore, it is faulty, and moreover illogical, to assume it was amped. Conversely, it was stated, shown AND alluded to that KT's hammer-throw was 'amped' when it killed Desak in the Destroyer armor. Therefore, it is sensible, and moreover logical, to asume it was amped.
Not only are you trying to compare incomparable instances, but worse yet, you're trying to justify why you're doing so. Poor logic... Very poor.
Originally posted by NihilistThanos /w/ PG and The Serpent, no?
It has only been broken once with pure physical strength hasn't it?
Originally posted by Galan007
Mjolnir is well above average Uru, thanks to the Odinpower/enchantments laced within it-- that much has been stated on panel, so we know it's fact.What was not stated, shown or even alluded to, is Thor's hammer-strike being in any way 'amped' when it struck the shield. Therefore, it is faulty, and moreover illogical, to assume it was amped. Conversely, it was stated, shown AND alluded to that KT's hammer-throw was 'amped' when it killed Desak in the Destroyer armor. Therefore, it is sensible, and moreover logical, to asume it was amped.
Not only are you trying to compare incomparable instances, but worse yet, you're trying to justify why you're doing so. Poor logic... Very poor.
Thanos /w/ PG and The Serpent, no?
It has not been stated that Mjolnir is stronger than Uru. We know it's stronger because of feats. It wasn't stated or shown that Mjolnir was amped in durability when it killed Desak but rather in destructive power and force.
Originally posted by h1a8It's also been stated... Scans can be found in the respect thread.
It has not been stated that Mjolnir is stronger than Uru. We know it's stronger because of feats.
Originally posted by h1a8Amped strikes/throws>>>unamped strikes/throws. This is incontrovertible.
It wasn't stated or shown that Mjolnir was amped in durability when it killed Desak but rather in destructive power and force.
Therefore, the amped throw KT used vs. Desak>>>the unamped strike he used vs. the shield. So again: those instances are not directly comparable in any way/shape/form. This is an extremely easy concept to grasp-- dunno why you're making it so difficult.
Originally posted by Galan007
It's also been stated... Scans can be found in the respect thread.Amped strikes/throws>>>unamped strikes/throws. This is incontrovertible.
Therefore, the amped throw KT used vs. Desak>>>the unamped strike he used vs. the shield. So again: those instances are not directly comparable in any way/shape/form. This is an extremely easy concept to grasp-- dunno why you're making it so difficult.
Uuummm, why are you debating against "him"? Save that energy for one dumb.
@Jake..even though you are right, stay out of this. 😉
Originally posted by Galan007
Yeah, I think I'll stop there with him. No use trying to press on anymore.
Please do.
@Jake. Always good to see Thor fans still being strong. Rage has given up and doesn't even visit the site anymore due to what writers are doing with Thor. Stay strong my friend. Stay strong.
Originally posted by Galan007
It's also been stated... Scans can be found in the respect thread.Amped strikes/throws>>>unamped strikes/throws. This is incontrovertible.
Therefore, the amped throw KT used vs. Desak>>>the unamped strike he used vs. the shield. So again: those instances are not directly comparable in any way/shape/form. This is an extremely easy concept to grasp-- dunno why you're making it so difficult.
My punched can be amped with more force behind it but that doesn't make my fist more durable. Being amped is ambiguous term, it could very well mean in force or destructive power only, not necessarily durability.
Also I went through the respect threads (Thor right?) but can't find it. Can you either point me to where it is or provide an issue number?
Originally posted by h1a8
My punched can be amped with more force behind it but that doesn't make my fist more durable. Being amped is ambiguous term, it could very well mean in force or destructive power only, not necessarily durability.Also I went through the respect threads (Thor right?) but can't find it. Can you either point me to where it is or provide an issue number?
Also , what sort of fluff are your fists made from , since they aren't more durable ?
Originally posted by TheGodKiller
Yes what ?I didn't mention adamantium .
