Originally posted by Nihilist
you're trying to use a example in which Doom had one aided prep and had foriegn tech created by the Beyonder which he doesn't have here, so yeah you have no case tard
Maybe you should read the OP and then try posting in an objective non fanboy fashion. Doom (like Thanos, who is weaker) has a Cosmic Cube here; they're made from the Beyonderville.
Originally posted by zopzop
Exactly. I even have a scan of Reed schooling the "Omniscient" Beyonder on the the nature of Time.@Nihilist
At this point they are just trolling you. Just ignore it. If they can't provide scans, that's all the confirmation you need.
Seeing as you're one of the only guys here posting examples, when has Doom schooled another super genius with prep? Not one sided prep, but both using prep. Example: Mr. Terrific vs Jason Burr in the JSA Kobra mini. It was like a chess game and it was awesome to read.
I'm sure it has happened, I just want more examples than the Beyonder one.
Originally posted by Golgo13Black Panther, who had prep.
Seeing as you're one of the only guys here posting examples, when has Doom schooled another super genius with prep? Not one sided prep, but both using prep. Example: Mr. Terrific vs Jason Burr in the JSA Kobra mini. It was like a chess game and it was awesome to read.I'm sure it has happened, I just want more examples than the Beyonder one.
Reed.
Tony.
Red Skull.
TOAA.
Originally posted by Robtard
So more strawman arguments? Good tactic; it's all you have. Calm down, we're discussing comic characters.
You didn't say Doom > Beyonder... Should I quote how many times you said that? Me quoting you.. is a strawman fallacy? LULZ.. Do you even know what a strawman means or you just like throwing out fallacy accusations to appear smart? Don't worry, you saying Doom > Beyonder let us all know that isn't possible already.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
You didn't say Doom > Beyonder... Should I quote how many times you said that? Me quoting you.. is a strawman fallacy? LULZ.. Do you even know what a strawman means or you just like throwing out fallacy accusations to appear smart? Don't worry, you saying Doom > Beyonder let us all know that isn't possible already.
You're taking what I said out of context and then attacking that; that's also a strawman argument. No need to thank me for teaching you something new.
Now, whenever you're ready to attack my actual argument, I'll be ready to slap you down again. Doom beats Thanos in this scenario, deal.
Originally posted by RobtardTotally beside the point you was trying to make and failing at.
Maybe you should read the OP and then try posting in an objective non fanboy fashion. Doom (like Thanos, who is weaker) has a Cosmic Cube here; they're made from the Beyonderville.
Fact is Doom had one sided prep and tech created by the Beyonder to take the Beyonder down, news flash he has neither here.
As for the part about the cubes coming from the Beyonderverse! So, Thanos all ready best the Maker[beyonder] without prep or tech.
Originally posted by Robtardhe stole the Beyonders power using one sided prep again which he doesn't have here. Nice try attempting to lowball Thanos, you do know Thanos has Doom under watch.
Incorrect.LoL. Doom has tech essentially created by the Beyonder here, has a Cosmic Cube. Doom doesn't need prep to beat Thanos here, as Thanos is no Beyonder; not by a long shot.
That was a weaker Beyonder, both insane and mortal. LoL.
Did you even read that arc? Her insanity had passed when Thanos fought her(stated on panel twice) and she was in mortal FORM only her power wasn't effected as again stated on panel she had the power to reverse the crunch energies and destroy the universe.
Atp name you're using tard
Originally posted by Robtard
The Beyonder > ThanosDoom > The Beyonder
ergo Doom > Thanos
Sounds logical to me.
So what exactly was taken out of context.. I quoted you exactly.. there was NOTHING taken out of context. If you would like to expand on YOUR quote and what that means.. that is one you. Until then, you're responsible for the drivel you post, and getting called out on it.
This is again, using a clear example of PIS and CIS on the beyonders part.. Which you admit had to have happened in order for Doom to pull that off. In fact, you called it horrible writing to illustrate the point. Yet, you think using a clear case of PIS and CIS puts you on steady ground? LULZ. It's in fact the complete opposite.
IF you were trying to say Doom outsmarted the beyonder and thus he'll outsmart Thanos.... Let's break that down shall me. Doom in return actually got dooped by the Beyonder right back. So when it comes to beating/tricking one another.. they would be 1 n 1. So how does being 1 n 1 equal One > Than the other? It doesn't and that defines logic and reason. Penn n Hughes are 1 n 1.. You can't say one has showed superiority over the other.. they are in fact tied in h2h matchups. I didn't know you ACTUALLY wanted me to take your argument seriously and deconstruct it with ease... Then again, you continue to surprise with what you post, and not in a good way.
Now, Doom in smarter than Thanos.. really.. you don't say.. WHAT exactly are you basing this on? Is this a fact or your assumption? Funny enough, the only direct encounter they had where they both went the same thing.. Thanos accomplished the goal.. Doom didn't. In fact, Doom admitted Thanos had superior tech. Not good. Yet, is a VERY subjective variable (who is smarter) the best way to determine this fight? Ummm NO.. clearly no. What would be the best way.. Hmmm... I don't know.. maybe comparing what they accomplished WITH the cube. Ya know, like Thanos feats shit all over Doom's feats with the cube. Wow, what a wild concept. Using comic book feats.. on a comic book sight... using feats of a artifact they've both had and what they were able to accomplish with it. Of course.. wait for it.. wait for it... Doom > Beyonder is surely the better way to determine such a fight... NOT. Well that was pretty easy. Thanks and come again.