Originally posted by NihilistNever low-balled Thanos. If you think me saying the Beyonder is more powerful than Thanos is low-balling Thanos, then you're delusional. Comic charters often keep watch on other characters they see as a threat, it's a smart tactic. Thank you for supporting that Thanos feels threatened by Doom; he should.
he stole the Beyonders power using one sided prep again which he doesn't have here. Nice try attempting to lowball Thanos, you do know Thanos has Doom under watch.Did you even read that arc? Her insanity had passed when Thanos fought her(stated on panel twice) and she was in mortal FORM only her power wasn't effected as again stated on panel she had the power to reverse the crunch energies and destroy the universe.
Atp name you're using tard
So what I still said, a weaker Beyonder by comparion. Good.
Clam down, we're debating comics.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
So what exactly was taken out of context.. I quoted you exactly.. there was NOTHING taken out of context. If you would like to expand on YOUR quote and what that means.. that is one you. Until then, you're responsible for the drivel you post, and getting called out on it.This is again, using a clear example of PIS and CIS on the beyonders part.. Which you admit had to have happened in order for Doom to pull that off. In fact, you called it horrible writing to illustrate the point. Yet, you think using a clear case of PIS and CIS puts you on steady ground? LULZ. It's in fact the complete opposite.
IF you were trying to say Doom outsmarted the beyonder and thus he'll outsmart Thanos.... Let's break that down shall me. Doom in return actually got dooped by the Beyonder right back. So when it comes to beating/tricking one another.. they would be 1 n 1. So how does being 1 n 1 equal One > Than the other? It doesn't and that defines logic and reason. Penn n Hughes are 1 n 1.. You can't say one has showed superiority over the other.. they are in fact tied in h2h matchups. I didn't know you ACTUALLY wanted me to take your argument seriously and deconstruct it with ease... Then again, you continue to surprise with what you post, and not in a good way.
Now, Doom in smarter than Thanos.. really.. you don't say.. WHAT exactly are you basing this on? Is this a fact or your assumption? Funny enough, the only direct encounter they had where they both went the same thing.. Thanos accomplished the goal.. Doom didn't. In fact, Doom admitted Thanos had superior tech. Not good. Yet, is a VERY subjective variable (who is smarter) the best way to determine this fight? Ummm NO.. clearly no. What would be the best way.. Hmmm... I don't know.. maybe comparing what they accomplished WITH the cube. Ya know, like Thanos feats shit all over Doom's feats with the cube. Wow, what a wild concept. Using comic book feats.. on a comic book sight... using feats of a artifact they've both had and what they were able to accomplish with it. Of course.. wait for it.. wait for it... Doom > Beyonder is surely the better way to determine such a fight... NOT. Well that was pretty easy. Thanks and come again.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
So what exactly was taken out of context.. I quoted you exactly.. there was NOTHING taken out of context. If you would like to expand on YOUR quote and what that means.. that is one you. Until then, you're responsible for the drivel you post, and getting called out on it.This is again, using a clear example of PIS and CIS on the beyonders part.. Which you admit had to have happened in order for Doom to pull that off. In fact, you called it horrible writing to illustrate the point. Yet, you think using a clear case of PIS and CIS puts you on steady ground? LULZ. It's in fact the complete opposite.
IF you were trying to say Doom outsmarted the beyonder and thus he'll outsmart Thanos.... Let's break that down shall me. Doom in return actually got dooped by the Beyonder right back. So when it comes to beating/tricking one another.. they would be 1 n 1. So how does being 1 n 1 equal One > Than the other? It doesn't and that defines logic and reason. Penn n Hughes are 1 n 1.. You can't say one has showed superiority over the other.. they are in fact tied in h2h matchups. I didn't know you ACTUALLY wanted me to take your argument seriously and deconstruct it with ease... Then again, you continue to surprise with what you post, and not in a good way.
Now, Doom in smarter than Thanos.. really.. you don't say.. WHAT exactly are you basing this on? Is this a fact or your assumption? Funny enough, the only direct encounter they had where they both went the same thing.. Thanos accomplished the goal.. Doom didn't. In fact, Doom admitted Thanos had superior tech. Not good. Yet, is a VERY subjective variable (who is smarter) the best way to determine this fight? Ummm NO.. clearly no. What would be the best way.. Hmmm... I don't know.. maybe comparing what they accomplished WITH the cube. Ya know, like Thanos feats shit all over Doom's feats with the cube. Wow, what a wild concept. Using comic book feats.. on a comic book sight... using feats of a artifact they've both had and what they were able to accomplish with it. Of course.. wait for it.. wait for it... Doom > Beyonder is surely the better way to determine such a fight... NOT. Well that was pretty easy. Thanks and come again.
TL;DR after the first sentence.
I have clearly said Doom outsmarted the Beyonder and this is why he wins in this scenario over Thanos. Not "Doom curbstomps the Beyonder" or the like as you seem to want to argue I claimed.
Now, if you're ready to attack my actual argument and not the strawmen you keep making, I'll be happy to continue smacking you about this thread.
Edit: Why did you feel a need to quote yourself and post your wall of what is likely dribble a second time? Do you also enjoy hearing yourself talk?
Originally posted by Robtardyou tried to imply Thanos has nothing to come at Doom with period showing either your complete lack of knowledge or that you're a sad troll.
Never low-balled Thanos. If you think me saying the Beyonder is more powerful than Thanos is low-balling Thanos, then you're delusional. Comic charters often keep watch on other characters they see as a threat, it's a smart tactic.So what I still said, a weaker Beyonder by comparion. Good.
I understand you're an illogical Thanos fanboy, but clam down, we're debating comics.
Fact is Thanos keeps tabs on Doom and knows what he's up to Doom doesn't have that luxury with Thanos.
Thanos still beat a cube lvl being in power, so all this cubes come from beyonderverse is moot.
Blah blah cry fanboy all you if you think it covers up the inferiority complex you seem to have about Thanos ,f*cktard .
Originally posted by Nihilist
you tried to imply Thanos has nothing to come at Doom with period showing either your complete lack of knowledge or that you're a sad troll.Fact is Thanos keeps tabs on Doom and knows what he's up to Doom doesn't have that luxury with Thanos.
Thanos still beat a cube lvl being in power, so all this cubes come from beyonderverse is moot.
Blah blah cry fanboy all you if you think it covers up the inferiority complex you seem to have about Thanos ,f*cktard .
So like your fellow Thanos loving buddy, you're strawmanning, as I never claimed any such thing. I clearly went with both of them having Cosmic Cubes; Doom wins this scenario.
Fact is, that isn't part of this thread, read the OP. That would be like prep though, are you just going to give prep to Thanos now cos you really need him to win? With prep, Thanos might win 4/10 in this scenario.
Doom did one better; that's the point. Do like how you try to low-ball Doom's check over the Beyonder though, it's cute.
Ah, so you like to insult, then cry when you get razzed back. Good, good. But again, calm down, we're discussing comics. Deep breaths, bro. Deep breaths.
Originally posted by Robtard
TL;DR after the first sentence.I have clearly said Doom outsmarted the Beyonder and this is why he wins in this scenario over Thanos. Not "Doom curbstomps the Beyonder" or the like as you seem to want to argue I claimed.
Now, if you're ready to attack my actual argument and not the strawmen you keep making, I'll be happy to continue smacking you about this thread.
Edit: Why did you feel a need to quote yourself and post your wall of what is likely dribble a second time? Do you also enjoy hearing yourself talk?
You haven't smacked around anybody but yourself. The drivel you've posted is self ownage. The deconstruction of your argument has just taken place.. and YOU FAILED TO ADDRESS IT AGAIN. Clearly you lack logic and common sense.. and I guess I'll have to add reading comprehension to the list as well. I'll break it down one more time.
1.. You said Doom > Beyonder... Yet is that really true... They are in fact 1 n 1... both got dooped by the other. So then, how if they are even, could one be > than the other?
2. You're using a clear case of CIS and PIS and basing your whole argument and stance on said CIS/PIS. Not only is that against forums rules, but it's a terrible way to form an argument.
3. Doom being smarter than Thanos is a very subjective stance. Not only would it be virtually impossible to prove, most would say Thanos is actually smarter than doom overall. Ya know, being from a far more advanced civilization and all.. In fact, in their only direct encounter where they were going after the same prize... Thanos got the prize.. Doom failed. In the very same comic (which illustrates advanced civ.) Doom admitted Thanos tech was superior to his... Point is, you're using something that is very subjective as your reasoning for giving the Doom the win here.. WHEN THE MORE IMPORTANT INFO IS....
4. Who performed better feats with the artifact they both have in this thread. WOW, crazy concept there huh? Which is more logical and sound... Using a PIS/CIS situation.. where neither showed superiority over the other... and using a subjective. Doom is smarter than Thanos argument... OR OR.. Who had the better feats with the cube in comics. That would be the BEST basis for saying who would win this particular fight. If somebody asked you.. who would win if Tim fought Bill and they both had bats... and you come back with Tim.. he's smarter than Bill and uses a gun well. Interesting, because the other friend who was asked goes.. Well I've seen them both fight with a bat and Bill did better. Which do you think would be the best line of thought in determining a winner?
Jesus you make this TOO easy... I like see you wiggle around my questions though.. it puts a smile on my face. I'm sure you'll avoid them again, but that is what most do when they are continually tooled.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
You haven't smacked around anybody but yourself. The drivel you've posted is self ownage. The deconstruction of your argument has just taken place.. and YOU FAILED TO ADDRESS IT AGAIN. Clearly you lack logic and common sense.. and I guess I'll have to add reading comprehension to the list as well. I'll break it down one more time.1.. You said Doom > Beyonder... Yet is that really true... They are in fact 1 n 1... both got dooped by the other. So then, how if they are even, could one be > than the other?
2. You're using a clear case of CIS and PIS and basing your whole argument and stance on said CIS/PIS. Not only is that against forums rules, but it's a terrible way to form an argument.
3. Doom being smarter than Thanos is a very subjective stance. Not only would it be virtually impossible to prove, most would say Thanos is actually smarter than doom overall. Ya know, being from a far more advanced civilization and all.. In fact, in their only direct encounter where they were going after the same prize... Thanos got the prize.. Doom failed. In the very same comic (which illustrates advanced civ.) Doom admitted Thanos tech was superior to his... Point is, you're using something that is very subjective as your reasoning for giving the Doom the win here.. WHEN THE MORE IMPORTANT INFO IS....
4. Who performed better feats with the artifact they both have in this thread. WOW, crazy concept there huh? Which is more logical and sound... Using a PIS/CIS situation.. where neither showed superiority over the other... and using a subjective. Doom is smarter than Thanos argument... OR OR.. Who had the better feats with the cube in comics. That would be the BEST basis for saying who would win this particular fight. If somebody asked you.. who would win if Tim fought Bill and they both had bats... and you come back with Tim.. he's smarter than Bill and uses a gun well. Interesting, because the other friend who was asked goes.. Well I've seen them both fight with a bat and Bill did better. Which do you think would be the best line of thought in determining a winner?
Jesus you make this TOO easy... I like see you wiggle around my questions though.. it puts a smile on my face. I'm sure you'll avoid them again, but that is what most do when they are continually tooled.
I stopped reading at your #1 point as you're still strawmanning. Maybe try a new tactic?
Originally posted by Galan007
If you're looking for prep feats that aren't one-sided, then Doom converted Nightmare from matter into pure energy, then absorbed that energy. ie. Doom easily absorbed ALL the power of the Unreal(ALL of humanity's subconscious black energy) without any kind of formal prep:
Thanos wins.
Originally posted by Robtard
I stopped reading at your #1 point as you're still strawmanning. Maybe try a new tactic?
concession accepted. Thanks for playing.. DON'T collect 200 as you haven't passed go yet, shit, you haven't even made it past Baltic yet. Not surprised, I already called you out no not answering because you couldn't handle your piss poor argument deconstructed. BTW, nobody believes you actually DIDN'T read the post.. LULZ. Anyways, hopefully you'll do better in another thread...
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Tell me jake ol' buddy ol' pal... How many times has Doom failed to conquer earth and how many times has he accomplished said goal? The disparity, is well, not a good one.
I like how you say Doom can't conquer Earth, yet somehow fail to recall how Thanos has been routed at virtually every turn.
Originally posted by zopzopDownplaying all day, my frond.
He should have better ones then. If he's the greatest of all time, beating a jobber prince and outsmarting a moron aren't the best way to prove your point.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiActually, there isn't really a disparity.
Tell me jake ol' buddy ol' pal... How many times has Doom failed to conquer earth and how many times has he accomplished said goal? The disparity, is well, not a good one.
