Originally posted by DARTH POWERAnd neither Savage nor Ventress could land a single hit on Dooku once he'd lost his lightsaber.
[B]Anakin also disarmed Obi-Wan. Maul still had his weapon. Sidious also got knocked on his ass by Yoda.
So, in your mind, Dooku is a better fighter without his lightsaber than he is with one?
When AOTC Obi-Wan can catch Dooku's Lightning with his Lightsaber, you would have to be crazy to think Current Maul whose tossing CW Obi-Wan around with the Force, couldn't do the same.You think Maul is Dooku's equal in the force? LOL.
No, Dooku would easily ragdoll Maul no problem.
By this logic Mace's performance against Sidious was poor because his 3 companions died.
No one is going to ever argue that Mace is Sideous' superior in sabers. Literally the only reason he managed to defeat Sideous was due to Vapaad.
But FYI your definition of Obi-Wan having to die to lose makes Obi-Wan invincible because we know he can't die for the convenience of the plot.This would only be true if we saw Maul dominating Obi-Wan. We never saw him do so at any point within the fight.