Russell Edgington vs. Link (TP)

Started by quanchi11271 pages

Originally posted by Pwned
Ahem,

Do the boots make him stronger Quan?

Not to rehash somebody else's stuff, but still. This is essentially what you are trying to make it. You repeat the same refuted arguments over and over, and generally annoy us benevolent people who attempt to make you see the correct side.
Then, we just get a stubborn streak and mindlessly post. And you have the nerve to say you win or we are failures?

Grow up.

The boots anchor him to the ground but without them he goes flying. This means Link gets tossed around like a ragdoll.

Whoever you are you're not someone who stands out. The growup speeches are tired and predictable. The gist is simple. Russell destroys Link. He's faster to the point of ridiculousness. Far weaker characters have damaged Link therefore Link goes down.

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
Screampaste, NemeBro, me, Scenario, and even GK spent like two months trying to teach you physics. Don't talk to me about ignorance.

I like the Urkel comment. It's good that you acknowledge my superior intellect. Urkel built time machines, cloning machines, and even turned himself into a movie version of Bruce Lee with ass-kicking power to match. But you probably didn't know that, from not watching that show. That's called ignorance.

Russel can be as fast as he wants and he won't do shit to Link. Well, he could build a mean punch with lots of speed, but I'd have to teach you some more physics for you to get that. And I don't have all the time I used to. No offense, you're not worth my time.

I spent weeks trying to teach about portrayals and not feat masturbation. I failed you kids but Thanos knows I tried.

You're a nerd like urkel not like you lived his life you ninny.

Less than Russell has hurt of been shown able to damage Link. Physics shows Link needs an anchor to resist goat like weight/speed so against Russell he's completely screwed.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I spent weeks trying to teach about portrayals and not feat masturbation. I failed you kids but Thanos knows I tried.

You're a nerd like urkel not like you lived his life you ninny.

Less than Russell has hurt of been shown able to damage Link. Physics shows Link needs an anchor to resist goat like weight/speed so against Russell he's completely screwed.

Your portrayal argument was complete shit. Just like everything else you claim.

Exactly. I'm incredibly intelligent, just like Urkel.

Prove it. Prove to me beyond a shadow of a doubt that Link can be hurt by less than Russel's strength.

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
Your portrayal argument was complete shit. Just like everything else you claim.

Exactly. I'm incredibly intelligent, just like Urkel.

Prove it. Prove to me beyond a shadow of a doubt that Link can be hurt by less than Russel's strength.

No, the portrayal argument is intelligent the feat nonsense is well; nonsense. You're just a nerd sidekick. You follow other people and don't think for yourself.

Your argument has always been asinine. It's like showing a video of someone punching me and my adrenaline shrugging it off. Then I'd claim I'm immune to any and all punches. That's silly. That's the gist of your Link took an axe shot in a video. The funniest part is here's a whole group of you who swears by it.

You admitted Russell is far faster so at worst case he wins since Link can't touch him.

Ah, and the monk returns to his Dumb Fu style. True to your form, not a shred of evidence even after you attacked me for not posting any two pages ago.

Unsurprisingly, you still fail to fully understand any argument in opposition. He was struck by an axe wielded by King Bulbin, who by the way is stronger than Russell. What does that say, that a Zelda mini boss is physically stronger than Russell?

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
Ah, and the monk returns to his Dumb Fu style. True to your form, not a shred of evidence even after you attacked me for not posting any two pages ago.

Unsurprisingly, you still fail to fully understand any argument in opposition. He was struck by an axe wielded by King Bulbin, who by the way is stronger than Russell. What does that say, that a Zelda mini boss is physically stronger than Russell?

Based on what is he stronger than Russell ? You have to be one of the least harmless debaters I've ever come across in my days.
4:15 in. His speed and you've already seen his strength.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=related&v=7MqdHEtcMhU

Now back up this bulbins strength claim.

Again link can't touch him. Ever. You agreed. Game over.

Your link won't work.

From what I remember, the only strength feat you ever showed for this guy was that car stopping nonsense, and that ended up being absolutely pathetic. So pathetic that it might have been more impressive that he was able to rip out someone's spine or heart or whatever the hell it was.

Both are much less impressive than knocking around a boar larger than any horse on earth with an axe larger than half of the same horses. I don't really feel like doing any math to see how heavy the axe and the boar would be, but I'd wager that's an easy one-ton feat if you compound the weights.

I didn't agree to that shit at all, lol. Don't know where you got that from.

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
Your link won't work.

From what I remember, the only strength feat you ever showed for this guy was that car stopping nonsense, and that ended up being absolutely pathetic. So pathetic that it might have been more impressive that he was able to rip out someone's spine or heart or whatever the hell it was.

Both are much less impressive than knocking around a boar larger than any horse on earth with an axe larger than half of the same horses. I don't really feel like doing any math to see how heavy the axe and the boar would be, but I'd wager that's an easy one-ton feat if you compound the weights.

I didn't agree to that shit at all, lol. Don't know where you got that from.

Russell did so easily while Link needs to brace. That's the difference along with the speed which makes Link look like a statue. You concede to me. You don't bring anything to the table.

Link draws sword, insta wins.

Originally posted by Blight
Russel is too fast.

i agree to this!

You can finish the game without tormenting chickens until they kill you.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Link draws sword, insta wins.
Rusell kills him faster than he can draw his sword. Your ignorance shames you.

Russell lacks the strength to adequately harm Link. Congratulations.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Russell lacks the strength to adequately harm Link. Congratulations.
But a goat can knock Link over. Any enemy in Zelda can kill Link. You have proven you cannot think for yourself time and time again.

I'm sorry, was that you repeating a defeated argument? Link survives forces greater than Russell is capable of exerting. Ergo, Russell cannot kill Link before Link draws his sword. Ergo, Link wins without even having to fight. That is how bad of a stomp this is.

Insult me more, it's cute how you **** it up everytime you try.

You've called Moo the "least harmless" (Think about it, it might take you a while to get it, but it's not what you intended) and now, when I disagree with your trite, you try and tell me I cannot think for myself.

Tell me then, if I can't think for myself why is it I'm using my own conclusions drawn from evidence rather than blindingly accepting your nonsense? O,rite. Because you're wrong. Herp.

Dude...you've got...crabs...

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
I'm sorry, was that you repeating a defeated argument? Link survives forces greater than Russell is capable of exerting. Ergo, Russell cannot kill Link before Link draws his sword. Ergo, Link wins without even having to fight. That is how bad of a stomp this is.

Insult me more, it's cute how you **** it up everytime you try.

You've called Moo the "least harmless" (Think about it, it might take you a while to get it, but it's not what you intended) and now, when I disagree with your trite, you try and tell me I cannot think for myself.

Tell me then, if I can't think for myself why is it I'm using my own conclusions drawn from evidence rather than blindingly accepting your nonsense? O,rite. Because you're wrong. Herp.

Link isn't immune to Russell strength. We go by portrayal not videos only. Link has been harmed by far less and he isn't even close to being as fast as Russell.
Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
Dude...you've got...crabs...
Wrong along unless you gather the courage to debate the source topic.

Link isn't immune to Russell strength.

Link's been: Hit with an axe by an opponent with super strength, fired into the sky out of a cannon, fired at the ground by a cannon, resisted being crushed by the force of giant rolling Gorons, (lol@acar...) charging super boars, and even thick stone doors, because **** it, why not.

Your argument hinges on gameplay mechanics. Guess what, in videogames enemies can damage you. SURPRISE.

Your argument allows for Link to shrug off damage from this:

Protip: It hits a lot ****ing harder than Russel does.

We go by portrayal not videos only.

1. Link is portrayed as superdurable.
2. You are not the arbitrator of Zelda canon.
3. You are not the arbitrator of how debates are run.

In short:

You and your wish to ignore evidence are irrelevant, and I'm only even responding to you because it's a slow night and I'm bored. It took me longer to find images for my replies than to shoot your half-baked post down. Once again, congratulations; you've amused me. Good boy.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Wrong along unless you gather the courage to debate the source topic.

I wasn't talking to you. It isn't always about you, Quan. Conceited. >_>

Link wins though. Smarter, better, faster, stronger.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste

Link's been: Hit with an axe by an opponent with super strength, fired into the sky out of a cannon, fired [b]at the ground by a cannon, resisted being crushed by the force of giant rolling Gorons, (lol@acar...) charging super boars, and even thick stone doors, because **** it, why not.

Your argument hinges on gameplay mechanics. Guess what, in videogames enemies can damage you. SURPRISE.

Your argument allows for Link to shrug off damage from this:

Protip: It hits a lot ****ing harder than Russel does.

1. Link is portrayed as superdurable.
2. You are not the arbitrator of Zelda canon.
3. You are not the arbitrator of how debates are run.

In short:

You and your wish to ignore evidence are irrelevant, and I'm only even responding to you because it's a slow night and I'm bored. It took me longer to find images for my replies than to shoot your half-baked post down. Once again, congratulations; you've amused me. Good boy.

[/B]

Yes, I can survive a car crash and survive an axe shot but that doesn't mean I am immune to damage. It's like saying shrugging off a punch or two in a fight and then claiming no punches will hurt you. You're a kid who has no grasp of anything because you're just a gamer. You don't live in the real world, dork.

Link survives. Link isn't super durable or super strong. Nor is he portrayed as such against his enemies. He is as strong as it takes to get the job done with gear, training, and the proper gear.

Russell has displayed superior strength when up against characters with true super strength. Russell shrugs his shoulders and tosses a super strong vampire thirty feet in the air while Link needs to brace up and close his faerie eyes to stop a goat.

Superior speed means dead Link.