Russell Edgington vs. Link (TP)

Started by ScreamPaste71 pages

Originally posted by quanchi112
To disarm an opponent while slowing down in under a second is more impressive than anything Epona has done. I mean saying something is not impressive without offering any proof as to her speed isn't debating its pouting.

Link has never destroyed a body like Russell has. Fact. Link needs a sword and still can't outperform the stronger Russell.

21 m/s is not impressive, Epona moves faster when she jumps canyons.

26, I think, losing count. Russell's best feats are all under 1 ton.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Eric can be caught off guard like any fictional being but his reactions and perceptions are far greater than humans to the point of it being ridiculous.
Good. Then nothing stops the vast majority of vamps, ones which are far slower than 1,000y/o's, from being took down.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
21 m/s is not impressive, Epona moves faster when she jumps canyons.

26, I think, losing count. Russell's best feats are all under 1 ton.

She also tires and you have not proven anything. Russell instantly reaches this speed and he stopped to disarm.

Russell destroys bodies whereas Link needs a sword to do so. M

For a hundred tonner you'd think he wouldn't rely own that sword as his crutch.

Originally posted by BloodRain
Good. Then nothing stops the vast majority of vamps, ones which are far slower than 1,000y/o's, from being took down.
They are all still faster than the Zelda characters. They move like blurs unlike any Zelda characters.

Originally posted by The Scenario
Aren't all portrayals abc logic? We know it didn't hurt Link at all, we know he pu enough force to send Link flying, and we saw it hit Link's entire anterior region.

Do the boots make Link more durable?

When has Link been punched in the face? We know he tanked an axe to the face.

You're ignoring context. Why is Link using a sword important?

It hurt him but did not kill him.

The boots stop the Gorons. Links strength cannot. The game makes it clear he needs the heavy boots to stop them. He can lift them just not stop them on his own.

We see Bulbins men drum him out.

Link used a sword the entire game. He needs it due to his inferior strength.

Originally posted by quanchi112
She also tires and you have not proven anything. Russell instantly reaches this speed and he stopped to disarm.

Russell destroys bodies whereas Link needs a sword to do so. M

For a hundred tonner you'd think he wouldn't rely own that sword as his crutch.


Good for Russell, he can 'instantly' be slower than a horse.

42. Link's strength is greater than Russell's.

43.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Good for Russell, he can 'instantly' be slower than a horse.

42. Link's strength is greater than Russell's.

43.

Russell has greater acceleteration, doesn't tire, and greater speed feats. What does Epona have again ?

False as he needs a sword to cut a body up unlike Russell.

Hooves.

46. You're bad at this.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Hooves.

46. You're bad at this.

So Russell is faster than Link's horse despite having two extra legs.

Link needs a sword the entire game and a proper technique to stop goats Bo can stop himself.

49. 21 m/s ftw.

50.

Where's the strengthfeat you promised on page 1 that would let Russell harm Link?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
49. 21 m/s ftw.

50.

Where's the strengthfeat you promised on page 1 that would let Russell harm Link?

Russell stopped and disarmed in that time.

Watch him rip apart bodies which Link can't even replicate with a sword you claim is capable of destroying continents further demeaning Link's strength.

😂

Originally posted by quanchi112
Russell stopped and disarmed in that time.

Watch him rip apart bodies which Link can't even replicate with a sword you claim is capable of destroying continents further demeaning Link's strength.

😂

Good for him. He stopped and grabbed something, how complicated!

55. No feats then?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Good for him. He stopped and grabbed something, how complicated!

55. No feats then?

To run over fifty feet in a blurry motion and disarm someone in one simple movement shows speed beyond anything Link has ever reacted to.

This feat alone proves Link dies.

Prove it was over fifty feet. Also, 58 for the blatant lie.

Even if it were fast enough (lol) it's not a strength feat and doesn't let Russell hurt Link. Ergo, 59. Try again.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Prove it was over fifty feet. Also, 58 for the blatant lie.

Even if it were fast enough (lol) it's not a strength feat and doesn't let Russell hurt Link. Ergo, 59. Try again.

It was obviously over fifty feet but a greater speed feat than anything Link or his horse has ever done is undeniable.

Russell ripping out spines is a strength feat. Link can't match that with a continental destroying sword iyo. 😂

You obviously have no evidence of that. 64.

Ripping out spines is easier than 99% of what Link does. 65.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
You obviously have no evidence of that. 64.

Ripping out spines is easier than 99% of what Link does. 65.

Probably over 50 feet but who cares he is far faster than Link or his horse who tires quickly.

Link can't rip out spines. 😆

Prove that.

70. You're almost at 100 lies, fallacies, and beaten points.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Prove that.

70. You're almost at 100 lies, fallacies, and beaten points.

No need as he is faster than Link. You conceded that.

Your point of a continent al destroying sword hurts Link more than anything.

73. Blatant lie.

74.

Your inability to prove Russell can harm his opponent loses him this thread.