Russell Edgington vs. Link (TP)

Started by quanchi11271 pages

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
I told you to prove Russell can hurt Link but you keep gettign distracted by trying to invent new ways to lowball.

Link wins, want a hug?

Russell has feats of ripping people apart. Link does not.

Russell wins, easily.

You can't even prove Link can break a person's nose without his crutch sword.

Ripping humans apart is not enough. 114.

115.

Russell's best feats can't scratch Link.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Ripping humans apart is not enough. 114.

115.

Russell's best feats can't scratch Link.

Link can't rip humans or anyone apart. You cannot even prove he can break a nose.

Bulbins men. Canon. Undeniable.

120. Blatant lie.

121. Defeated point.

Russell can't hurt Link.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
120. Blatant lie.

121. Defeated point.

Russell can't hurt Link.

Prove it then. You need to prove something.

All you are doing his typing words without anything of merit to your debate.

Russell rips him up. Link can't hurt anyone without his sword.

126.

127.

128.

Russell can't harm Link without a better strength feat than he has, and Russell is dead so he isn't getting new strength feats. Russell therefore cannot win.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
126.

127.

128.

Russell can't harm Link without a better strength feat than he has, and Russell is dead so he isn't getting new strength feats. Russell therefore cannot win.

Russell has greater strength feats than Link has. Your opinion is baseless. You can't prove one thing you claim. Not one.

130. Blatant lie.

Prove Russell can hurt Link.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
130. Blatant lie.

Prove Russell can hurt Link.

Russell rips out spines. What has Link ever done to a human body without a weapon ?

Bulbins men. Point proven.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Russell rips out spines. What has Link ever done to a human body without a weapon ?

Bulbins men. Point proven.


132. Fallacy.

133. Defeated point.

Prove Russell is strong enough to hurt Link.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
132. Fallacy.

133. Defeated point.

Prove [b]Russell is strong enough to hurt Link. [/B]

Bulbins men ko'd him. Russell is far stronger than them. Point proven. I support my arguments you don't.

138. Defeated point.

Russell needs a better strength feat to harm Link.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
138. Defeated point.

Russell needs a better strength feat to harm Link.

Saying defeated point is not a counter. It's amazing how you think it is.

No, he does not. Backed my example with a canon beatdown of Link.

142. Defeated point.

So you have no strength feat for Russell that lets him hurt Link, good.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
142. Defeated point.

So you have no strength feat for Russell that lets him hurt Link, good.

Bulbins men. Canon. You can't change a fact. You can deny it all you want as it is still canon.

160. Defeated point.

Russell's best strength feat is not enough to harm Link.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
160. Defeated point.

Russell's best strength feat is not enough to harm Link.

Bulbins men.

164. Defeated point.

Prove Russell is strong enough.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
164. Defeated point.

Prove Russell is strong enough.

Russell can rips spines out. Your turn. Can Link break a nose ?

That's not good enough. Sorry. So Russell's best feat is not enough, he can't win then.