Thor vs Hancock

Started by ares8343 pages
Originally posted by Newjak
He blocked it with one arm then he held it in place with two, and Hulk couldn't get his arm back from Thor then hit Thor with the other.

Lol

Anyway, Hancock wins. He is far faster and far stronger.

Originally posted by Newjak
He blocked it with one arm then he held it in place with two, and Hulk couldn't get his arm back from Thor then hit Thor with the other.

The only time Hulk had the upper hand was in that scene you mentioned right before the F-22 shows up, but no one as fasr as I know is saying Thor is as strong as Hulk but he's comparable.

It was a downward slam style fist if I remember this correctly and while Thor did block the initial hit with his, the fist was still moving down and then he used his other hand even then it was still going down just struggling more.

Hulk had the upper hand pretty much the entire fight the one good shot Thor got in was when he first got his hammer.

I was just saying that a lot of people are giving Thor feats with his strength via scaling it from Hulk when the two aren't even at the same level.

Originally posted by McNasty996
It was a downward slam style fist if I remember this correctly and while Thor did block the initial hit with his, the fist was still moving down and then he used his other hand even then it was still going down just struggling more.

Hulk had the upper hand pretty much the entire fight the one good shot Thor got in was when he first got his hammer for the most part.

I was just saying that a lot of people are giving Thor feats with his strength via scaling it from Hulk when the two aren't even at the same level.

No the fist was shaking and you can see the look of surprise on Hulk's face as he couldn't straight over power Thor. Thor grabbed both arms because he was trying to reason with Hulk.

What are you talking about Thor was dominating the match.

He hit Hulk with his hammer, then he dodged Hulk's attacks easily and gave him some painful hits in return.

Hulk only managed to get the upper hand when Thor jumped on his back and Hulk jumped through the ceiling to knock him off.

Originally posted by Newjak
No the fist was shaking and you can see the look of surprise on Hulk's face as he couldn't straight over power Thor. Thor grabbed both arms because he was trying to reason with Hulk.

Thor used both arms because Hulk's arm was still moving forward after the initial black... And we don't see Hulk's face until Thor braces with his second arm. Quit lying.

Originally posted by Newjak
What are you talking about Thor was dominating the match.

facepalm

Originally posted by McNasty996
Hulk had the upper hand pretty much the entire fight the one good shot Thor got in was when he first got his hammer.

Lolbullshit. Hulk only had the upper hand at the end.

Thor at first was bobbing and weaving, avoiding Hulk's blows, before stopping his fist and trying to reason with him, opening up a cheapshot on Thor. Then, when Thor acquired Mjolnir, he began to dominate Hulk, slamming him backwards and choking him out with his hammer (Which he couldn't do if he didn't have strength in Hulk's weight class, Hulk grabbed Thor's forearms to try and break the hold, but couldn't). It was only at the end did Hulk start getting the upper hand.

Oh, and look carefully. Thor used the one hand to block the slam, he used his other hand to hold Hulk's fist there as he tried to reason with him.

Hancock has exactly zero durability feats to suggest he would be invulnerable to Thor's attacks.

Also, Thor's first punch on Hulk spun him to a full 360 degrees. Yeah but Hulk easily no-sold that right?

It amazes me, how much people downplay Thor in order to wank Hulk.

Originally posted by NemeBro

Hancock has exactly zero durability feats to suggest he would be invulnerable to Thor's attacks.

Hancock is invulnerable all full power, you greasy fat ****.

But if you're going to cry that being invulnerable isn't enough, even weakened he took being slammed by a semi truck by someone stronger than him without a scratch.

Hancock does to Hulk what Hulk did to Loki.

Originally posted by Robtard
Hancock is invulnerable, you greasy fat ****.

But if you're going to cry that being invulnerable isn't enough, even weakened he took being slammed by a semi truck by someone stronger than him without a scratch.

No-limits fallacy.

That means nothing to me. Thor has much more firepower.

Originally posted by NemeBro
No-limits fallacy.

That means nothing to me. Thor has much more firepower.

Invulnerability is a power, so cry more. Hancock was never harmed until weakened and he took hits from someone far stronger than Thor.

Like what, some lighting and a shock-wave, or did you mean his tornado trick? LoL, that's going to harm a guy who can survive orbital entry.

Thor could have duplicated almost every feat Hancock pulled off in the movies, except for the the speeding bank robber nabbing part, in some form or fashion.

Originally posted by Newjak
Thor could have duplicated almost every feat Hancock pulled off in the movies, except for the the speeding bank robber nabbing part, in some form or fashion.

So Thor in under a day showed he could have flown to the moon and craved a super-massive shape into it? Cos that's Hancock's most impressive; shows ridiculously greater speed and strength than Thor has shown.

Originally posted by Robtard
So Thor in under a day showed he could have flown to the moon and craved a super-massive massive shape into it? Cos that's Hancock's most impressive; shows greater speed and strength than Thor has shown.

Duh, he's Thor. He was just always holding back in the movies all the time.

Originally posted by Robtard
So Thor in under a day showed he could have flown to the moon and craved a super-massive massive shape into it? Cos that's Hancock's most impressive; shows ridiculously greater speed and strength than Thor has shown.
Possibly yes Jotteheim Buster was quick enough to use. I'm sure he could have caused those over the surface of the moon. Maybe he wouldn't get it done in the same amount of time but he could have done it.

Originally posted by Newjak
Possibly yes Jotteheim Buster was quick enough to use. I'm sure he could have caused those over the surface of the moon. Maybe he wouldn't get it done in the same amount of time but he could have done it.

LoL. Stop wanking Thor.

Originally posted by Robtard
LoL. Stop wanking Thor.
How am I wanking Thor he was an extremely powerful individual whose greatest feat was likened to a thermo-nuclear explosion by one of the main people working on the set.

As for the moon feat no one knows how Hancock did it or if he even altered the surface of the moon other than changing the color. Thor could possibly replicate based on the powers he was shown to have.

Originally posted by Robtard
Invulnerability is a power, so cry more. Hancock was never harmed until weakened and he took hits from someone far stronger than Thor.

Prove either can hit as hard as Thor.

Because the jotunheim smash, the Leviathan buster, physically combatting Hulk, those are above every single feat Hancock performed.

Point out where it was stated by anyone who isn't a fallible character (I don't even know if Mary said this) that Hancock is completely invulnerable.

Like what, some lighting and a shock-wave, or did you mean his tornado trick? LoL, that's going to harm a guy who can survive orbital entry.

The Jotunheim smash for one.

And lol, ignorant tool. Atmospheric re-entry would give Hancock a great degree of heat resistance, it is only barely equivelant to possessing classic durability, aka from say, blunt force trauma. Do you think space shuttles can take hits from Thor too?

Hancock could be resistant to the heat of Thor's lightning, that is all that feat proves (And probably not really, lightning is IIRC hotter than the heat one would face with atmospheric re-entry).

Also, lol?

YouTube video

We can clearly see that the structure of the moon under the red paint is intact you tool. "Carved", lol. Lying cretin.

Still can't fly there.

How does fighting the Hulk prove he could fight Hancock? Hancock would make mincemeat out of the Hulk. Besides he didn't really fight him like an equal, for most of the fight he got schooled. He got a few good hits in but for most of the fight he was getting tossed around like a rag doll. Then the jet fighter showed up and he had to duck and hide from simple machine gun fire.

He couldn't even break Iron Man with Mjolnir.

Originally posted by The Silent Hero
How does fighting the Hulk prove he could fight Hancock? Hancock would make mincemeat out of the Hulk. Besides he didn't really fight him like an equal, for most of the fight he got schooled. He got a few good hits in but then he was getting tossed around like a rag doll. Then the jet fighter showed up and he had to duck and hide from simple machine gun fire.

He couldn't even break Iron Man with Mjolnir.

Most of the fight he was hurting and landing more blows against the Hulk than Hulk was getting on Thor.

And you're right he didn't break Ironman with Mjolnir, Thor was doing it with his bare hands 😛

Originally posted by Newjak
Most of the fight he was hurting and landing more blows against the Hulk than Hulk was getting on Thor.

Only one of them had a bloody nose...

Yes, Thor may have landed more hits. Bur when Hulk hit Thor it was far more damaging. Still, saying Thor "got schooled" is wrong.

Hancock is way faster and stronger.