Movie Superman and movie Avengers switch places

Started by FrothByte2 pages
Originally posted by Placidity
That is merely an assertion, which by itself cannot be proven by the scientific method. It is circular reasoning.

So just because something isn't provable by science right now you're saying that it can never be scientifically proven in the future?

OP has ulterior motives.

Reeves Superman > All of the Avengers.

what's the point of this thread?

Originally posted by Placidity
Art doesn't make any claims...

There are things that are beyond what science cannot prove, that is why there is philosophy.

No but in a world that claims that everything must be able to be broken down into neat quantifiable packages, (Science) creativity, consciousness and expressions of it are a bit of a pain in the arse.

Philosophy is one tool.

Originally posted by FrothByte
So just because something isn't provable by science right now you're saying that it can never be scientifically proven in the future?
Exactly..

Originally posted by FrothByte
So just because something isn't provable by science right now you're saying that it can never be scientifically proven in the future?

No. I was denying Sadako's assertion that it will be scientifically proven in the future. An obvious and important difference.

Can you show me a quote where i said that?

The "Yet" could be perpetual..

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Can you show me a quote where i said that?

The "Yet" could be perpetual..

"Yet" does imply inevitability in its basic meaning and in context of your/Thor's claim, otherwise it adds no meaning or value to the sentence whatsoever, yet the whole assertion hinges on that very word. If you meant it in a "perpetual" sense that may never eventuate then basically you've based your claim on nothing. There is no premise for the assertion at all.

Also, there is no perpetual time frame. When the universe reaches maximum entropy, and undergoes the heat death, it will not sustain life.

Thor has no foundation to make such a claim unless he is omniscient.

Depends how slowly time moves in whatever localised region of space. 😛

Less assertion and more speculation.

Originally posted by omgchos
I think hed be able to take LowKey on speed and strength. Not to mention his heat vision and ice breath.

Epic reference, it is ****ing gross that no one commented on it.

American Gods >

Originally posted by Placidity
Art doesn't make any claims...

There are things that are beyond what science cannot prove, that is why there is philosophy.

Anyway, even though Thor said that line once, I feel it was clearly not what the movie wanted to depict. Otherwise you'd have to believe Odin is really just a scientist who gave himself superpowers, but purposely made sure it looked like there was no tech involved. He also made sure that his super advanced society didn't have some of the "lower" tech stuff like, I dunno, transport vehicles, computers, Earth-grade military weapons etc.

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SufficientlyAdvancedAlien

Originally posted by NemeBro
[B]Epic reference, it is ****ing gross that no one commented on it.

American Gods >

Good Omens > American Gods.

Still, it's a damn good book.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Epic reference, it is ****ing gross that no one commented on it.

Thanks Bro.