Originally posted by focus4chumps
oh dear my mistake. didnt read what chest said. phew that kid was angry. my bad indeed, that was just intended to show what a deplorable douche-clown santorum is. i sure hope the chest comment didn't rustle any jimmies here.
I think it is.
Cut away the second paragraph (which is basically a long insult) and his post isn't that unreasonable.
Originally posted by Omega Vision
You sound like a less vitriolic/foul-mouthed Zeal right now.
I have plenty of criticism for the GOP: they are definitely not angels. I just don't get the chance around these parts because everyone is so rabidly opposed to the GOP.
Originally posted by focus4chumps
oh dear my mistake. didnt read what chest said. phew that kid was angry. my bad indeed, that was just intended to show what a deplorable douche-clown santorum is. i sure hope the chest comment didn't rustle any jimmies here.
I thought Santorum was being an ass, actually. But I thought you posted that for Chest's commentary. My bad.
Originally posted by Ascendancy
Angry, not mad. 😎
Well, he did come off a bit psychotic...as though he were about to punch a Republican baby.
About the treaty (gasp! a directly on topic post!):
Undue burden...
What do you peeps think should be the line for requiring accommodations from a business? I think the line should be a business with 1000 or more employees and/or an annual revenue of $500,000,000 or more. At that point, I think a business should be required to have things like ramps into buildings, bigger elevators with accessible buttons, braille on some of the signs, handrails meant for accommodating the disabled, and alternative methods of delivering company information (training in audio form, video form, instead of just writing, for example).
Is that reasonable? Did I set the bar too high? Do I need to reconsider and say...make smaller businesses get down on some of this?