Indestructible Hulk vs Destroyer

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Then why bring up the word 'metal', rather than' imagine if it can melt adamantium, what it would do to flash and bone'.

Or

'This is the same as Ultron's QM, which etc etc'.

And I love you like a bro too. Like Cain loved Abel.

He did bring up the gun melting Adamantium...he doesn't have to keep pounding us in the face with something so obvious. Bringing it up one time should've been good enough. Again, Adamantium is metal and Adamantium has been called metal on 100's of occasions. Hell, Spiderman just said Wolverine would be ok from a fall because of his METAL bones.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
I compare myself to the entire cast of the Expendables.

If you wrote that in a fiction book, I would believe you.

Even if those weapons were proven adamantium melters, it wouldn't mean much in the end. Don't get me wrong, it'd be a hell of a feat, but it's not like Hulk's going to get consistently portrayed as being > adamantium. He's going to get cut,burned,broken, etc by things that wouldn't put a dent in adamantium. It's comics. /shrug

carver level lowballing ironically used against carver himself

what a pile of burning shit this thread turned out to be

Originally posted by Damborgson
Even if those weapons were proven adamantium melters, it wouldn't mean much in the end. Don't get me wrong, it'd be a hell of a feat, but it's not like Hulk's going to get consistently portrayed as being > adamantium. He's going to get cut,burned,broken, etc by things that wouldn't put a dent in adamantium. It's comics. /shrug

I agree...I just think this version of Hulk is just different and the writer is trying to give us an idea of his power level (along with bringing up his incalculable strength). I have no argument against what you've just stated because no character is consistent. I still think its a good showing for Hulk but it will be something that will vanish.

Regardless of what the gun could destroy its not like Hulk reg ability wouldn't help , 1 could argue hulk was just regeration faster then the gun could destory

Originally posted by carver9
I agree...I just think this version of Hulk is just different and the writer is trying to give us an idea of his power level (along with bringing up his incalculable strength). I have no argument against what you've just stated because no character is consistent. I still think its a good showing for Hulk but it will be something that will vanish.

👆

Originally posted by DarkOdin
Regardless of what the gun could destroy its not like Hulk reg ability wouldn't help , 1 could argue hulk was just regeration faster then the gun could destory

Then they would have to prove it since we see Hulk clearly shrugging it off.

Originally posted by psycho gundam
carver level lowballing ironically used against carver himself

Originally posted by carver9
I agree but he compared his gun to the one that melted Adamantium.

He did, but secondary adamantium's been referred to as just "adamantium" countless times. Like I said, we have no idea which Ultron model inspired MT.

Originally posted by carver9
Then they would have to prove it since we see Hulk clearly shrugging it off.

It is indeed speculation, and ambiguous.

Indestructible Hulk will clearly see some amazing feats. The Mad Thinker's feat just isn't that good, tbh.

Originally posted by DarkOdin
Regardless of what the gun could destroy its not like Hulk reg ability wouldn't help , 1 could argue hulk was just regeration faster then the gun could destory

True. I think his transmutation resistance played a bigger factor, though.

I understood what the writer said along with others. Of course there will always be others to dispute a ft. That ft will be presented in his respect thread though, no matter what other people opinions on the matter is.

Originally posted by carver9
I understood what the writer said along with others. Of course there will always be others to dispute a ft. That ft will be presented in his respect thread though, no matter what other people opinions on the matter is.

Btw, carver, I was lying earlier.

I love you like Abel loved Cain.

hulk

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Btw, carver, I was lying earlier.

I love you like Abel loved Cain.

👆

Honestly though, guys, please get on topic.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW

😂

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
why?

Feats, obviously.

Indestructible Hulk really displayed nothing beyond the likes of Savage Hulk. Even being cited as having "incalculable" strength, while a nice feat, is something that Hulk's been stated as having time and time again. It means little in terms of a forum match as he's not walking around with infinite strength or anything. Pitting a specific incarnation of a character with literally two issues under his belt against the Destroyer and asking who wins is pretty ridiculous, imo.

Via feats, the Destroyer's energy output >>> Mad Thinker's gimmick. It's also far more durable than what Hulk has shown able to damage.