Originally posted by quanchi112
3 or 4 haters. Popularity doesn't mean you're right anyways. That's absurd and quite foolish for you to even suggest.
3-4 unbiased posters. That means a lot actually
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
I'm very suprised he isn't used to losing by now.
He probably was the kid that always reset the video game right as he lost to pretend he always won. He just can't accept the truth
Originally posted by juggermanYou can lie to yourself all you want but you've yet to respond to my argument just me the poster. I've won. Appeal to the majority is one of the weakest things while ignoring the argument I've ever seen.
3-4 unbiased posters. That means a lot actuallyHe probably was the kid that always reset the video game right as he lost to pretend he always won. He just can't accept the truth
😂
Originally posted by juggerman
3-4 unbiased posters. That means a lot actuallyHe probably was the kid that always reset the video game right as he lost to pretend he always won. He just can't accept the truth
lol yea. But anyway feat by feat the ones that actaully count that means Voldmoert can't get his elder wand feats since he doesn't have the wand, at least I would assume that's how it would work.
Dumbleodre showed greater control of fire with his Fire laso then Voldemrt with Fiendfyre which Dumbleodre easily countered.
In their deul Vo,domestic couldn't get passed his defenses until he unleashed all that dark energy at once while for Dumbleodre a concentrated wave of water is all it took and he would have drowned if Harry hadn't gotten to close.
Dumbleodre has way more experience
Voldmeort actaully feared Dumbleodre as an individual while Dumbloedre didn't, only as a danger to his students and the wizarding world.
He abandon his deul with Dumbleodre even before the aurors showed up and Dumbledore hadn't even unleashed full power.
Since you have all of that while the opposition has nothing you win. His only proof is most likely against the rules since it's not specifically in the film and it's special features and the mod had a ruling once where it's just the movies not commentary or anything like that. Even if it were admissible there prof comes from the books which is defintly illegal here thus it's inadmissible either way.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
lol yea. But anyway feat by feat the ones that actaully count that means Voldmoert can't get his elder wand feats since he doesn't have the wand, at least I would assume that's how it would work.Dumbleodre showed greater control of fire with his Fire laso then Voldemrt with Fiendfyre which Dumbleodre easily countered.
In their deul Vo,domestic couldn't get passed his defenses until he unleashed all that dark energy at once while for Dumbleodre a concentrated wave of water is all it took and he would have drowned if Harry hadn't gotten to close.
Dumbleodre has way more experience
Voldmeort actaully feared Dumbleodre as an individual while Dumbloedre didn't, only as a danger to his students and the wizarding world.
He abandon his deul with Dumbleodre even before the aurors showed up and Dumbledore hadn't even unleashed full power.
Since you have all of that while the opposition has nothing you win. His only proof is most likely against the rules since it's not specifically in the film and it's special features and the mod had a ruling once where it's just the movies not commentary or anything like that. Even if it were admissible there prof comes from the books which is defintly illegal here thus it's inadmissible either way.
Also remember that Voldemort casted his attack first. Dumbledore reacted afterwards and simultaneously force pushed Harry out of the way. Even when reacting second and with split attention, their beams still met in the middle. That tells us that Albus is undoubtedly the faster of the two
And keep in mind Tom was going all out trying under no uncertain terms to kill Albus. Albus OTOH was only trying to protect himself and Harry. Imagine if he were going all out man. He would have stutter stomped Tommy
If we break down the fight moment by moment it's clear as day that Voldemort lost. Every attack of his was either outright blocked or countered while Dumbledore scored the clean hit of the match and likely would have kept Voldemort in the bubble had Harry not broken his focus. Quan just hates things like facts bro
Originally posted by quanchi112
I already explained myself but I responded to your argument whereas you haven't. Sign of a bad debater is to just engage the debater and completely bypass the argument.
You explained that when a poster leaves a thread for an elongated period of time(maybe a few days) that they have conceded. You left for months. You have not only conceded but you have presented your bottom for penetration. Luckily for you I don't swing your way.
Originally posted by juggermanNo, you misrepresented my argument. If you leave and don't respond to the argument. I responded to the argument. You didn't hence you've conceded until you do especially since you're responding here but avoiding the argument.
You explained that when a poster leaves a thread for an elongated period of time(maybe a few days) that they have conceded. You left for months. You have not only conceded but you have presented your bottom for penetration. Luckily for you I don't swing your way.
Originally posted by quanchi112
No, you misrepresented my argument. If you leave and don't respond to the argument. I responded to the argument. You didn't hence you've conceded until you do especially since you're responding here but avoiding the argument.
If you leave how can you respond? You left and didn't respond. As per your own stance you conceded. Don't try to change the wording now 😂