Originally posted by Zack M
Why would I compare WW to Batman or Superman? Cap is considered an icon and his movie doesn't compare to WW.
Because it's more comparable to Batman, Superman and Spider-Man than to Cap and Hulk (Marvel's most famous first phase characters).
Now I'm not trying to take away from Wonder Woman's success. Obviously if it sucked it wouldn't have made anywhere close to as much as it did.
But I do think audiences were crying out and waiting for a female lead superhero film (just like they were crying out for a Spider-Man movie 15 years ago), and Wonder Woman is bar none the most famous and most iconic female superhero name.
Originally posted by Zack M
Its not WB fault that their a list characters make bank. WB has,been pushing most of these characters out way before Marvel, so they deserve the success.Besides, most of the current hits aren't A list, but obscure, smaller characters.
It's not their fault, but you need to notice the obvious before harping on about their first 4 films trashing the first 4 MCU films at the box office.
Like if Marvel had the rights to Spider-Man and the X-Men, and made those films in their first phase, you know they obviously would have grossed in the $700mill to $900mill range without even trying.
Flash and Aquaman are not in the A-List range, but they are using Justice League to promote them first.
We all remember what happened in their first attempt to launch a shared cinematic universe with a B-Lister with Green Lantern. They just assumed it would be easy after what Marvel did, but after GL they realized it's not as easy as it looks Lol.