Justice League (2018)

Originally posted by Firefly218
Both fall within the umbrella of misogyny. The difference is Brett Ratner had no creative influence on the DCEU whereas Perlmutter DID have creative influence over the MCU

Originally posted by quanchi112
One was a business decision so when it comes to making money you have no point. They make decisions based off what they believe makes the most money. No major actor seems to have a huge issue with it as Gal has with that guy. I guess you don't see any clear difference between a business decision and a sexual predatory type decision.

Originally posted by Firefly218
Except Ratner's sexually predatory crimes have nothing to do with the DCEU. Gal Gadot not wanting him to profit off Wonder Woman 2 is a business decision too, she can't associate her brand with a creep like Ratner.

Originally posted by quanchi112
One had to do with what would make their company the most money not with his own personal fetishes. So now you're undermining her position as a person and claiming it's only business related. If this was so bad why hasn't the director made the same stance. Yours a DC fanboy making up excuses and trying to compare sexual predator behavior to a business decision. 😂

If you claim Perlmutter was making a business decision, than I can claim Gal Gadot was making a business decision with equal validity. If you claim Gal Gadot was making a moral decision against misogyny, I can claim Perlmutter was making a immoral decision fueled by misogyny with equal validity.

Ultimately neither you nor I knows much, so the point is don’t talk too much trash.

And I’m not a DCEU fanboy, the MCU is clearly superior.

Originally posted by Firefly218
Who are you to say whether it was a business decision or misogyny?

If you claim Perlmutter was making a business decision, than I can claim Gal Gadot was making a business decision with equal validity. If you claim Gal Gadot was making a moral decision against misogyny, I can claim Perlmutter was making a immoral decision fueled by misogyny with equal validity.

Ultimately neither you nor I knows much, so the point is don’t talk too much trash.

And I’m not a DCEU fanboy, the MCU is clearly superior.

I do not believe she was but I'll try to look into this to prove the difference. If you the general public is aware of his affiliation with this film you're being disingenuous. Just stop.

https://screenrant.com/wonder-woman-2-release-date/

WW cucks to Star Wars. Betas.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Your perpestovr isn't taking in the comparison between marvel and DC. Your idea of boring doesn't matter as you like Kang. No one likes that boring and bland pile of shit. Point is marvel villains are superior to DC ones. DC at this point is trying to ape marvel as well.

😂

So my opinion on Marvel villains sucks because I like Marvel villains?

Kang is fun and has a lot of personality, sadly the MCU is lacking in that charismatic kind of enemy that can overshadow the actual héroes in their own movies (besides maybe Loki?). My fingers are crossed so Thanos is at least a thin shadow of his comicbook counterpart.

I also found the Game Master to be a nice change of pace precisely for the above reasons.

Originally posted by Bentley
So my opinion on Marvel villains sucks because I like Marvel villains?

Kang is fun and has a lot of personality, sadly the MCU is lacking in that charismatic kind of enemy that can overshadow the actual héroes in their own movies (besides maybe Loki?). My fingers are crossed so Thanos is at least a thin shadow of his comicbook counterpart.

I also found the Game Master to be a nice change of pace precisely for the above reasons.

You're ignoring Ultron, Ego, Zemo, WS and Loki if you like the deeper villains.

Russos are handling Thanos. Do you have faith in them ?

I think Ultron and Zemo were underdevelopped for the roles they were supposed to play to be honest. Bucky did not ooze personality either. The humans were effective foils because of the plot they carried, but forgettable as characters.

The fact that Ultron (who was serviceable at best) ranks high as a Marvel villain shows how they are nothing to write home about.

I think the Russos will get most of the movie right. Hopefully they won't sacrifice Thanos to make it happen.

It took zero guts for Gal to say WB must choose between her and Ratner. Absolutely Zero.

Smart move however as she comes across looking like... well a Wonder Woman.

Warner said that story isn't true.

https://www.cinemablend.com/news/1724799/warner-bros-says-the-gal-gadot-and-brett-ratner-story-is-not-true

Originally posted by Bentley
I think Ultron and Zemo were underdevelopped for the roles they were supposed to play to be honest. Bucky did not ooze personality either. The humans were effective foils because of the plot they carried, but forgettable as characters.

The fact that Ultron (who was serviceable at best) ranks high as a Marvel villain shows how they are nothing to write home about.

I think the Russos will get most of the movie right. Hopefully they won't sacrifice Thanos to make it happen.

Box office matters your pitiful feelings don't.

Isn't Affleck in the same boat as BW?

I don't follow hollywood socialite, but i read a small story that Affleck knew f Weistein's sexual conquest.

If that's true about Affleck, why isn't she asking to have Affleck fired too?

Warner denied that story through cinemablend. I do not recall the specifics about his exploits off hand.

I feel good. woke up and took a shiit in my back yard. barked at the neighbor's dogs. feels real good

Did they fear you?

Four days to go, and still the review embargo hasn't been lifted by Warner Bros. All the early advanced word said was that the film was a somewhat entertaining mixed bag.

Mixed on Rotten Tomatoes means a score between 40-70%.

We'll see if that is good enough.

Rotten Tomatoes is doing the embargo lift on Wednesday to promote their Facebook show See it/ Skip it.

Originally posted by playa1258
Rotten Tomatoes is doing the embargo lift on Wednesday to promote their Facebook show See it/ Skip it.

They are doing it Wednesday because Warners can't delay any longer than that. All the talk that they would lift it earlier if there was great reaction to the film - as they did with Wonder Woman - that proved to be bunk and a stall tactic.

Originally posted by roughrider
Four days to go, and still the review embargo hasn't been lifted by Warner Bros. All the early advanced word said was that the film was a somewhat entertaining mixed bag.

Mixed on Rotten Tomatoes means a score between 40-70%.

We'll see if that is good enough.

It's probably going to be ROTTEN.