Originally posted by ScreamPasteYes, it can but it doesn't need to as the attacks are comparing apples and oranges. Dorf has never survived an attack which causes instant death.
If you're going to be wrong at least be wrong coherently. Your posts doesn't make sense.Voldemort still can't overcome the ToP. What now?
I feel so lame for getting this joke, lol.
Originally posted by ScreamPasteNot instant death. Completely different.
Having your chest impaled tends to kill you. Lol. Being incinerated tends to kill you.Voldemort is weaker than the ToP, he cannot overcome it and therefore cannot kill Ganondorf. Prove otherwise.
You are just making baseless claims. Dorf died in his own movie and he dies here, instantly.
Lol. There's no noteworthy difference. You're making a no limit fallacy claim on a spell that's never killed anything more durable than a man and that has failed to kill a baby with less protection than Ganondorf has innately.
Ganondorf explicitly cannot die until the ToP is overcome, it doesn't matter if it's 'instant', it cannot be done without the ToP being overrode. Voldemort cannot do this. Prove he can.
Originally posted by ScreamPasteNo, I am saying it doesn't have anything to do with durability which is what killed Dorf. You are saying or simply deciding it can't work despite not being able to back it up with any examples. You do this all the time.
Lol. There's no noteworthy difference. You're making a no limit fallacy claim on a spell that's never killed anything more durable than a man and that has failed to kill a baby with less protection than Ganondorf has innately.Ganondorf explicitly cannot die until the ToP is overcome, it doesn't matter if it's 'instant', it cannot be done without the ToP being overrode. Voldemort cannot do this. Prove he can.
Yes, it does matter. The avada kedavra would overcome it anyway but the top is only seen resisting durability attacks which are not instantaneous in any way.
Originally posted by ScreamPasteThis is exactly what fanboys do. Highlight greatest feat and ignore the rest or how it's consistently portrayed. That's why I knew you'd never accept.
Gameplay mechanics and irrelevant. The sword is magical, and it is more powerful than the ToP, Voldemort is not.Prove Voldemort can overcome the ToP.
Instant death. The burden is on you.
Originally posted by ScreamPaste1. So when a sword is plunged into him and his eyes shuts that is supposed to signify a nap. You are lucky you didn't accept with this terrible argument.
1. It's never said he died.
2. Master Sword.Voldemort doesn't have The Master Sword.
2. Which can be parried by any opponent sword. This isn't something truly awesome like the soul reaver.
He doesn't need a weak sword which can't oneshot his enemies. Why would he want a downgrade ?
Originally posted by ScreamPasteSo wait a minute the top fading out doesn't mean it stopped working ? You are arguing without it dorf can't be killed. LOL.
You backed down, not me, Quan. Also, Ganondorf stood back up after Link impaled him, his eyes didn't close at all, they were open the entire time.Gameplay mechanics.
You're ignoring that without something to overcome the ToP Voldemort cannot kill Ganondorf.
Which is canon to the game. You can't ignore it.
You backed down. Someone else accepted. Aurangel told you and you should have listened.
This will be my fifth one. You have done 0 and will continue to be a 0.