The other arguments were pretty valid, but the PI (nor spelling that again) undid the last spell he did. Those "images" are souls. No getting around that.
ARE
ares834Senior Member
Ok, but that doesn't mean anything. The fact that they are souls doesn't mean his wand ripped their souls out. It's merely bring them back, albeit temporarily, in what is presumably the only way it can.
NOT
NotAllThatEvilperpetual new guy.
It undoes the last spell. If PI brings souls back, then AvK takes souls away. Deductive reasoning and all that.
ARE
ares834Senior Member
No. That's not what it does. It reveals the last spell not undoes it. Anyway, the AK certainly does not take away souls after all Voldemort's soul was not taken away.
NOT
NotAllThatEvilperpetual new guy.
What do you mean his soul wasn't taken away, that's kinda what happens when you die.
ARE
ares834Senior Member
I mean His soul was still wandering the Earth.
NOT
NotAllThatEvilperpetual new guy.
Yeah, because he just made the horcruxes for kicks and giggles. Wasn't that kinda the point
ARE
ares834Senior Member
Sure, it was to make immortal. Regardless you claimed AK takes away souls. I showed you that's not what it does.
SCR
ScreamPasteCarpe Noctem
Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil What do you mean his soul wasn't taken away, that's kinda what happens when you die.
This doesn't necessarily make it a soul attack.
shrug
NOT
NotAllThatEvilperpetual new guy.
Originally posted by ares834 Sure, it was to make immortal. Regardless you claimed AK takes away souls. I showed you that's not what it does.
In every other case of AK, the victim is left with a perfectly healthy corpse (minus the whole being dead bit), but in the love sheild instance his body was destroyed. Obviously something went askew.
ARE
ares834Senior Member
Perhaps. But you still haven't proven that AK takes souls.
NOT
NotAllThatEvilperpetual new guy.
I feel like I gave enough evidence for it to be a strong possibility. You haven't necessarily proved that it doesn't.
QUA
quanchi112Disney
Zelda fans don't think they have to prove anything. They just say magical resistance and thinks that cuts it for Dorf.
ARE
ares834Senior Member
Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil I feel like I gave enough evidence for it to be a strong possibility. You haven't necessarily proved that it doesn't.
One does not need to prove a negative.
Nor have I claimed it does not attack the soul.
NOT
NotAllThatEvilperpetual new guy.
No, ganondorf has enough resistance to probably tank one or two if he braced himself. I'm saying since the effect is usually instant, that a lucky shot he wasn't prepared for could take him down.
NOT
NotAllThatEvilperpetual new guy.
You could at least give another option. From what I've seen, the only explanation is that it attacks the soul.
ARE
ares834Senior Member
It's magic. It could quit simply just kill. Or,if you want an explanation, it could destroy some ones life force or stop all brain activity.
NOT
NotAllThatEvilperpetual new guy.
But the brain was completely healthy. And if it stopped working, your heart would beating and your lungs would keep breathing.
ARE
ares834Senior Member
Stopping all breain activy with agic wouldn't require any damage to the brain. After all, MAGIC!
And the lungs would stop if there was absolutely no brain activity not merely the higher functions.